Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers

PURPOSE: Trials comparing minimally invasive rectal surgery have uniformly excluded T4 tumors. The present study aimed to determine the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for locally-advanced rectal cancers requiring pelvic exenterations based on benchmarked outcomes from the international P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazi, Mufaddal, Desouza, Ashwin, Nashikkar, Chaitali, Saklani, Avanish
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601490
http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.131
_version_ 1784853071215460352
author Kazi, Mufaddal
Desouza, Ashwin
Nashikkar, Chaitali
Saklani, Avanish
author_facet Kazi, Mufaddal
Desouza, Ashwin
Nashikkar, Chaitali
Saklani, Avanish
author_sort Kazi, Mufaddal
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Trials comparing minimally invasive rectal surgery have uniformly excluded T4 tumors. The present study aimed to determine the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for locally-advanced rectal cancers requiring pelvic exenterations based on benchmarked outcomes from the international PelvEx database. METHODS: Consecutive patients of T4 rectal cancers with urogenital organ invasion that underwent MIS exenterations between November 2015 and June 2022 were analyzed from a single center. A safety threshold was set at 20% for R1 resections and 40% for major complications (≥grade IIIA) for the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The study included 124 MIS exenterations. A majority had a total pelvic exenteration (74 patients, 59.7%). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 95 (76.6%) and 29 (23.4%) had the robotic operation. Major complications were observed in 35 patients (28.2%; 95% CI, 20.5%–37.0%). R1 resections were found pathologically in nine patients (7.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%–13.4%). The set safety thresholds were not crossed. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 44 patients (35.5%) recurred with 8.1% local recurrence rate. The 2-year overall and disease-free survivals were 85.2% and 53.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MIS exenterations for locally-advanced rectal cancers demonstrated acceptable morbidity and safety in term of R0 resections at experienced centers. Longer follow-up is required to demonstrate cancer survival outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97634852023-01-03 Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers Kazi, Mufaddal Desouza, Ashwin Nashikkar, Chaitali Saklani, Avanish J Minim Invasive Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Trials comparing minimally invasive rectal surgery have uniformly excluded T4 tumors. The present study aimed to determine the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for locally-advanced rectal cancers requiring pelvic exenterations based on benchmarked outcomes from the international PelvEx database. METHODS: Consecutive patients of T4 rectal cancers with urogenital organ invasion that underwent MIS exenterations between November 2015 and June 2022 were analyzed from a single center. A safety threshold was set at 20% for R1 resections and 40% for major complications (≥grade IIIA) for the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: The study included 124 MIS exenterations. A majority had a total pelvic exenteration (74 patients, 59.7%). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 95 (76.6%) and 29 (23.4%) had the robotic operation. Major complications were observed in 35 patients (28.2%; 95% CI, 20.5%–37.0%). R1 resections were found pathologically in nine patients (7.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%–13.4%). The set safety thresholds were not crossed. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 44 patients (35.5%) recurred with 8.1% local recurrence rate. The 2-year overall and disease-free survivals were 85.2% and 53.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MIS exenterations for locally-advanced rectal cancers demonstrated acceptable morbidity and safety in term of R0 resections at experienced centers. Longer follow-up is required to demonstrate cancer survival outcomes. The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery 2022-12-15 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9763485/ /pubmed/36601490 http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.131 Text en Copyright © The Korean Society of Endo-Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgery. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kazi, Mufaddal
Desouza, Ashwin
Nashikkar, Chaitali
Saklani, Avanish
Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title_full Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title_short Minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
title_sort minimally invasive surgery for maximally invasive tumors: pelvic exenterations for rectal cancers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601490
http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2022.25.4.131
work_keys_str_mv AT kazimufaddal minimallyinvasivesurgeryformaximallyinvasivetumorspelvicexenterationsforrectalcancers
AT desouzaashwin minimallyinvasivesurgeryformaximallyinvasivetumorspelvicexenterationsforrectalcancers
AT nashikkarchaitali minimallyinvasivesurgeryformaximallyinvasivetumorspelvicexenterationsforrectalcancers
AT saklaniavanish minimallyinvasivesurgeryformaximallyinvasivetumorspelvicexenterationsforrectalcancers