Cargando…
An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Or...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561385 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015 |
_version_ | 1784853108412645376 |
---|---|
author | Mohan, Reshma Jain, Ravindra Kumar |
author_facet | Mohan, Reshma Jain, Ravindra Kumar |
author_sort | Mohan, Reshma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Ormco), Damon (Ormco), Heat-activated NiTi (HANT) (G&H Orthodontics), Stainless Steel wire (SS) (Ormco), and conventional NiTi (G&H Orthodontics) were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The processing of 3D images was carried out using Gwyddion software, from which the root mean square (rms), the roughness average (Ra), and the maximum height (mh) of the scanned surface profile were documented. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests for intergroup comparisons. Results. The mean SR of SS wires was the least (Ra=8.70±0.17), followed by NiTi wires (10.29±2.00) with a significant difference between them (P<0.05). Among the three shape-memory wires, the HANT wires had the least SR (Ra=22.97±16.56) compared to SmartArch wires (Ra=25.55±3.78) and Damon wires (Ra=25.67±4.54), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. The SS wires by Ormco had the least SR followed by G&H orthodontics NiTi wires. The three different shape-memory wires tested had no significant difference in SR values. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9763664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97636642022-12-21 An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study Mohan, Reshma Jain, Ravindra Kumar J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Ormco), Damon (Ormco), Heat-activated NiTi (HANT) (G&H Orthodontics), Stainless Steel wire (SS) (Ormco), and conventional NiTi (G&H Orthodontics) were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The processing of 3D images was carried out using Gwyddion software, from which the root mean square (rms), the roughness average (Ra), and the maximum height (mh) of the scanned surface profile were documented. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests for intergroup comparisons. Results. The mean SR of SS wires was the least (Ra=8.70±0.17), followed by NiTi wires (10.29±2.00) with a significant difference between them (P<0.05). Among the three shape-memory wires, the HANT wires had the least SR (Ra=22.97±16.56) compared to SmartArch wires (Ra=25.55±3.78) and Damon wires (Ra=25.67±4.54), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. The SS wires by Ormco had the least SR followed by G&H orthodontics NiTi wires. The three different shape-memory wires tested had no significant difference in SR values. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9763664/ /pubmed/36561385 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015 Text en ©2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mohan, Reshma Jain, Ravindra Kumar An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title | An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_full | An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_fullStr | An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_full_unstemmed | An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_short | An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study |
title_sort | in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: an atomic force microscopy study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561385 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohanreshma aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT jainravindrakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT mohanreshma invitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy AT jainravindrakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy |