Cargando…

An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study

Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Reshma, Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561385
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015
_version_ 1784853108412645376
author Mohan, Reshma
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
author_facet Mohan, Reshma
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
author_sort Mohan, Reshma
collection PubMed
description Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Ormco), Damon (Ormco), Heat-activated NiTi (HANT) (G&H Orthodontics), Stainless Steel wire (SS) (Ormco), and conventional NiTi (G&H Orthodontics) were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The processing of 3D images was carried out using Gwyddion software, from which the root mean square (rms), the roughness average (Ra), and the maximum height (mh) of the scanned surface profile were documented. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests for intergroup comparisons. Results. The mean SR of SS wires was the least (Ra=8.70±0.17), followed by NiTi wires (10.29±2.00) with a significant difference between them (P<0.05). Among the three shape-memory wires, the HANT wires had the least SR (Ra=22.97±16.56) compared to SmartArch wires (Ra=25.55±3.78) and Damon wires (Ra=25.67±4.54), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. The SS wires by Ormco had the least SR followed by G&H orthodontics NiTi wires. The three different shape-memory wires tested had no significant difference in SR values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9763664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97636642022-12-21 An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study Mohan, Reshma Jain, Ravindra Kumar J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The present study evaluated and compared the surface roughness (SR) of five different types of orthodontic archwires made by two different manufacturers. Methods. In this in vitro study, 10 samples of five different archwires comprising of three types of shape memory wires, SmartArch (Ormco), Damon (Ormco), Heat-activated NiTi (HANT) (G&H Orthodontics), Stainless Steel wire (SS) (Ormco), and conventional NiTi (G&H Orthodontics) were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The processing of 3D images was carried out using Gwyddion software, from which the root mean square (rms), the roughness average (Ra), and the maximum height (mh) of the scanned surface profile were documented. The data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests for intergroup comparisons. Results. The mean SR of SS wires was the least (Ra=8.70±0.17), followed by NiTi wires (10.29±2.00) with a significant difference between them (P<0.05). Among the three shape-memory wires, the HANT wires had the least SR (Ra=22.97±16.56) compared to SmartArch wires (Ra=25.55±3.78) and Damon wires (Ra=25.67±4.54), but the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusion. The SS wires by Ormco had the least SR followed by G&H orthodontics NiTi wires. The three different shape-memory wires tested had no significant difference in SR values. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2022 2022-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9763664/ /pubmed/36561385 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015 Text en ©2022 The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohan, Reshma
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title_full An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title_fullStr An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title_short An in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: An atomic force microscopy study
title_sort in vitro comparative evaluation of surface roughness characteristics of different orthodontic archwires: an atomic force microscopy study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9763664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36561385
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.015
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanreshma aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT jainravindrakumar aninvitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT mohanreshma invitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy
AT jainravindrakumar invitrocomparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnesscharacteristicsofdifferentorthodonticarchwiresanatomicforcemicroscopystudy