Cargando…

The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders

BACKGROUND: Family involvement during severe mental illness is still poorly implemented, contrary to evidence-based recommendations. Confidentiality issues are among the most prominent barriers, with mental health professionals facing complex ethical, legal, and practical challenges. However, resear...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansson, Kristiane Myckland, Romøren, Maria, Weimand, Bente, Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik, Hestmark, Lars, Landeweer, Elleke G. M., Pedersen, Reidar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6
_version_ 1784853283400056832
author Hansson, Kristiane Myckland
Romøren, Maria
Weimand, Bente
Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
Hestmark, Lars
Landeweer, Elleke G. M.
Pedersen, Reidar
author_facet Hansson, Kristiane Myckland
Romøren, Maria
Weimand, Bente
Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
Hestmark, Lars
Landeweer, Elleke G. M.
Pedersen, Reidar
author_sort Hansson, Kristiane Myckland
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Family involvement during severe mental illness is still poorly implemented, contrary to evidence-based recommendations. Confidentiality issues are among the most prominent barriers, with mental health professionals facing complex ethical, legal, and practical challenges. However, research focusing on this barrier is very sparse. Nested within a cluster-randomised trial to implement guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres, the aim of this sub-study was to explore ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality as experienced by mental health professionals, and to explore key measures that might contribute to improving the handling of such challenges. METHODS: In total 75 participants participated in 21 semi-structured focus groups, including implementation team members at the initial and late phase of the intervention period and clinicians who were not on the implementation teams, at late phase of implementation. We used purposive sampling and manifest content analysis to explore participants’ experiences and change processes. RESULTS: Ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality included 1) Uncertainty in how to apply the legislation, 2) Patient autonomy versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 3) Patient alliance and beneficence versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 4) How to deal with uncertainty regarding what relatives know about the patients’ illness, and 5) Relatives’ interests versus the duty of confidentiality. Measures to facilitate better handling of the duty of confidentiality included 1) Training and practice in family involvement, and 2) Standardisation of family involvement practices. CONCLUSION: When health professionals gained competence in and positive experiences with family involvement, this led to vital changes in how they interpreted and practiced the duty of confidentiality in their ethical reasoning and in clinical practice. Especially, the need to provide sufficient information to the patients about family involvement became evident during the study. To improve the handling of confidentiality issues, professionals should receive training in family involvement and confidentiality statutes followed by practice. Furthermore, family involvement should be standardised, and confidentiality guidelines should be implemented in the mental health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177. Registered 11.03.19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9764492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97644922022-12-21 The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders Hansson, Kristiane Myckland Romøren, Maria Weimand, Bente Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik Hestmark, Lars Landeweer, Elleke G. M. Pedersen, Reidar BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Family involvement during severe mental illness is still poorly implemented, contrary to evidence-based recommendations. Confidentiality issues are among the most prominent barriers, with mental health professionals facing complex ethical, legal, and practical challenges. However, research focusing on this barrier is very sparse. Nested within a cluster-randomised trial to implement guidelines on family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres, the aim of this sub-study was to explore ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality as experienced by mental health professionals, and to explore key measures that might contribute to improving the handling of such challenges. METHODS: In total 75 participants participated in 21 semi-structured focus groups, including implementation team members at the initial and late phase of the intervention period and clinicians who were not on the implementation teams, at late phase of implementation. We used purposive sampling and manifest content analysis to explore participants’ experiences and change processes. RESULTS: Ethical challenges related to the duty of confidentiality included 1) Uncertainty in how to apply the legislation, 2) Patient autonomy versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 3) Patient alliance and beneficence versus a less strict interpretation of the duty of confidentiality, 4) How to deal with uncertainty regarding what relatives know about the patients’ illness, and 5) Relatives’ interests versus the duty of confidentiality. Measures to facilitate better handling of the duty of confidentiality included 1) Training and practice in family involvement, and 2) Standardisation of family involvement practices. CONCLUSION: When health professionals gained competence in and positive experiences with family involvement, this led to vital changes in how they interpreted and practiced the duty of confidentiality in their ethical reasoning and in clinical practice. Especially, the need to provide sufficient information to the patients about family involvement became evident during the study. To improve the handling of confidentiality issues, professionals should receive training in family involvement and confidentiality statutes followed by practice. Furthermore, family involvement should be standardised, and confidentiality guidelines should be implemented in the mental health services. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177. Registered 11.03.19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6. BioMed Central 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9764492/ /pubmed/36539741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hansson, Kristiane Myckland
Romøren, Maria
Weimand, Bente
Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
Hestmark, Lars
Landeweer, Elleke G. M.
Pedersen, Reidar
The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title_full The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title_fullStr The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title_full_unstemmed The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title_short The duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
title_sort duty of confidentiality during family involvement: ethical challenges and possible solutions in the treatment of persons with psychotic disorders
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539741
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04461-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssonkristianemyckland thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT romørenmaria thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT weimandbente thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT heiervangkristinsverdvik thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT hestmarklars thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT landeweerellekegm thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT pedersenreidar thedutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT hanssonkristianemyckland dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT romørenmaria dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT weimandbente dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT heiervangkristinsverdvik dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT hestmarklars dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT landeweerellekegm dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders
AT pedersenreidar dutyofconfidentialityduringfamilyinvolvementethicalchallengesandpossiblesolutionsinthetreatmentofpersonswithpsychoticdisorders