Cargando…
Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refrac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5 |
_version_ | 1784853288582119424 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Divya Parthasarathy Negiloni, Kalpa Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel Velkumar, Selvaraj Sivaraman, Anand Baig, Adeeb Ulla Kumari, B. Murali, Kaushik |
author_facet | Rao, Divya Parthasarathy Negiloni, Kalpa Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel Velkumar, Selvaraj Sivaraman, Anand Baig, Adeeb Ulla Kumari, B. Murali, Kaushik |
author_sort | Rao, Divya Parthasarathy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was − 0.13D for M, − 0.0002D (J0) and − 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was − 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/− 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/− 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9764520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97645202022-12-21 Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study Rao, Divya Parthasarathy Negiloni, Kalpa Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel Velkumar, Selvaraj Sivaraman, Anand Baig, Adeeb Ulla Kumari, B. Murali, Kaushik BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was − 0.13D for M, − 0.0002D (J0) and − 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was − 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/− 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/− 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9764520/ /pubmed/36536321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rao, Divya Parthasarathy Negiloni, Kalpa Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel Velkumar, Selvaraj Sivaraman, Anand Baig, Adeeb Ulla Kumari, B. Murali, Kaushik Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title | Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title_full | Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title_fullStr | Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title_short | Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study |
title_sort | validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: a prospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raodivyaparthasarathy validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT negilonikalpa validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT gurunathansivasundaravadivel validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT velkumarselvaraj validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT sivaramananand validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT baigadeebulla validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT kumarib validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy AT muralikaushik validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy |