Cargando…

Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study

BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Divya Parthasarathy, Negiloni, Kalpa, Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel, Velkumar, Selvaraj, Sivaraman, Anand, Baig, Adeeb Ulla, Kumari, B., Murali, Kaushik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5
_version_ 1784853288582119424
author Rao, Divya Parthasarathy
Negiloni, Kalpa
Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel
Velkumar, Selvaraj
Sivaraman, Anand
Baig, Adeeb Ulla
Kumari, B.
Murali, Kaushik
author_facet Rao, Divya Parthasarathy
Negiloni, Kalpa
Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel
Velkumar, Selvaraj
Sivaraman, Anand
Baig, Adeeb Ulla
Kumari, B.
Murali, Kaushik
author_sort Rao, Divya Parthasarathy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was − 0.13D for M, − 0.0002D (J0) and − 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was − 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/− 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/− 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9764520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97645202022-12-21 Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study Rao, Divya Parthasarathy Negiloni, Kalpa Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel Velkumar, Selvaraj Sivaraman, Anand Baig, Adeeb Ulla Kumari, B. Murali, Kaushik BMC Ophthalmol Research BACKGROUND: Refraction is one of the key components of a comprehensive eye examination. Auto refractometers that are reliable and affordable can be beneficial, especially in a low-resource community setting. The study aimed to validate the accuracy of a novel wave-front aberrometry-based auto refractometer, Instaref R20 against the open-field system and subjective refraction in an adult population. METHODS: All the participants underwent a comprehensive eye examination including objective refraction, subjective acceptance, anterior and posterior segment evaluation. Refraction was performed without cycloplegia using WAM5500 open-field auto refractometer (OFAR) and Instaref R20, the study device. Agreement between both methods was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. The repeatability of the device based on three measurements in a subgroup of 40 adults was assessed. RESULTS: The refractive error was measured in 132 participants (mean age,30.53 ± 9.36 years, 58.3% female). The paired mean difference of the refraction values of the study device against OFAR was − 0.13D for M, − 0.0002D (J0) and − 0.13D (J45) and against subjective refraction (SR) was − 0.09D (M), 0.06 (J0) and 0.03D (J45). The device agreed within +/− 0.50D of OFAR in 78% of eyes for M, 79% for J0 and 78% for J45. The device agreed within +/− 0.5D of SR values for M (84%), J0 (86%) and J45 (89%). CONCLUSION: This study found a good agreement between the measurements obtained with the portable autorefractor against open-field refractometer and SR values. It has a potential application in population-based community vision screening programs for refractive error correction without the need for highly trained personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5. BioMed Central 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9764520/ /pubmed/36536321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rao, Divya Parthasarathy
Negiloni, Kalpa
Gurunathan, Sivasundaravadivel
Velkumar, Selvaraj
Sivaraman, Anand
Baig, Adeeb Ulla
Kumari, B.
Murali, Kaushik
Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title_full Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title_fullStr Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title_short Validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: A prospective study
title_sort validation of a simple-to-use, affordable, portable, wavefront aberrometry-based auto refractometer in the adult population: a prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02684-5
work_keys_str_mv AT raodivyaparthasarathy validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT negilonikalpa validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT gurunathansivasundaravadivel validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT velkumarselvaraj validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT sivaramananand validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT baigadeebulla validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT kumarib validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy
AT muralikaushik validationofasimpletouseaffordableportablewavefrontaberrometrybasedautorefractometerintheadultpopulationaprospectivestudy