Cargando…

High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a critical condition that results in significant neurologic deterioration. An accurate diagnosis is essential for determining its outcome and prognosis. The pathology is strongly associated with dynamic factors; therefore, dynamic magnetic resonan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Wook-Tae, Min, Woo-Kie, Shin, Ji-Hoon, Ko, Sang-Bong, Son, Eun-Seok, Kim, Jiyoun, Jang, Jihoon, Lee, Gun Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06097-9
_version_ 1784853296516694016
author Park, Wook-Tae
Min, Woo-Kie
Shin, Ji-Hoon
Ko, Sang-Bong
Son, Eun-Seok
Kim, Jiyoun
Jang, Jihoon
Lee, Gun Woo
author_facet Park, Wook-Tae
Min, Woo-Kie
Shin, Ji-Hoon
Ko, Sang-Bong
Son, Eun-Seok
Kim, Jiyoun
Jang, Jihoon
Lee, Gun Woo
author_sort Park, Wook-Tae
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a critical condition that results in significant neurologic deterioration. An accurate diagnosis is essential for determining its outcome and prognosis. The pathology is strongly associated with dynamic factors; therefore, dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) image could be crucial to accurately detect CSM. However, very few studies have evaluated the reliability and accuracy of dynamic MR in CSM. In this study, we aimed to compare intra- and interobserver reliabilities and accuracy of dynamic MR in detecting CSM using sagittal MR scans of the neck in the flexed, neutral, and extended position. METHODS: Out of 131 patients who underwent surgical treatments for CSM, 107 were enrolled in this study. The patient underwent three-types of sagittal MR scans that were obtained separately in different neck positions (neutral, flexion, and extension postures). The MR scans of the cervical spine were evaluated independently by three spine professionals, on the basis of tabled questionnaires. For accuracy, we performed a receiver operator characteristic analysis, and the overall discriminating ability of each method was measured by calculating the area under the ROC curve. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient and the Fleiss-generalized kappa coefficient was used to the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. RESULTS: The intraobserver reliability (using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient) and interobserver reliability (using the Fless kappa coefficient) were respectively 0.64 and 0.52 for the neutral sagittal MR. The accuracy of neutral sagittal MR in detecting CSM was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.720 to 0.741) while that of extension sagittal MRI was 0.932 (96% CI, 0.921 to 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic MR significantly showed better diagnostic reliability and accuracy in detecting CSM compared to conventional MR. In particular, extension MR scans could provide a more accurate diagnosis than other images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9764552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97645522022-12-21 High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study Park, Wook-Tae Min, Woo-Kie Shin, Ji-Hoon Ko, Sang-Bong Son, Eun-Seok Kim, Jiyoun Jang, Jihoon Lee, Gun Woo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a critical condition that results in significant neurologic deterioration. An accurate diagnosis is essential for determining its outcome and prognosis. The pathology is strongly associated with dynamic factors; therefore, dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) image could be crucial to accurately detect CSM. However, very few studies have evaluated the reliability and accuracy of dynamic MR in CSM. In this study, we aimed to compare intra- and interobserver reliabilities and accuracy of dynamic MR in detecting CSM using sagittal MR scans of the neck in the flexed, neutral, and extended position. METHODS: Out of 131 patients who underwent surgical treatments for CSM, 107 were enrolled in this study. The patient underwent three-types of sagittal MR scans that were obtained separately in different neck positions (neutral, flexion, and extension postures). The MR scans of the cervical spine were evaluated independently by three spine professionals, on the basis of tabled questionnaires. For accuracy, we performed a receiver operator characteristic analysis, and the overall discriminating ability of each method was measured by calculating the area under the ROC curve. The Cohen’s kappa coefficient and the Fleiss-generalized kappa coefficient was used to the inter- and intra-observer reliabilities. RESULTS: The intraobserver reliability (using the Cohen’s kappa coefficient) and interobserver reliability (using the Fless kappa coefficient) were respectively 0.64 and 0.52 for the neutral sagittal MR. The accuracy of neutral sagittal MR in detecting CSM was 0.735 (95% CI, 0.720 to 0.741) while that of extension sagittal MRI was 0.932 (96% CI, 0.921 to 0.948). CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic MR significantly showed better diagnostic reliability and accuracy in detecting CSM compared to conventional MR. In particular, extension MR scans could provide a more accurate diagnosis than other images. BioMed Central 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9764552/ /pubmed/36536358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06097-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Park, Wook-Tae
Min, Woo-Kie
Shin, Ji-Hoon
Ko, Sang-Bong
Son, Eun-Seok
Kim, Jiyoun
Jang, Jihoon
Lee, Gun Woo
High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title_full High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title_fullStr High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title_short High reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
title_sort high reliability and accuracy of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a multicenter study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36536358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06097-9
work_keys_str_mv AT parkwooktae highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT minwookie highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT shinjihoon highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT kosangbong highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT soneunseok highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT kimjiyoun highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT jangjihoon highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy
AT leegunwoo highreliabilityandaccuracyofdynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofcervicalspondyloticmyelopathyamulticenterstudy