Cargando…

Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strum, Ryan P, Mondoux, Shawn, Mowbray, Fabrice, Worster, Andrew, Griffith, Lauren E, Tavares, Walter, Miller, Paul, Hanel, Erich, Aryal, Komal, Sivakumaran, Ravi, Costa, Andrew P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488
_version_ 1784853308522889216
author Strum, Ryan P
Mondoux, Shawn
Mowbray, Fabrice
Worster, Andrew
Griffith, Lauren E
Tavares, Walter
Miller, Paul
Hanel, Erich
Aryal, Komal
Sivakumaran, Ravi
Costa, Andrew P
author_facet Strum, Ryan P
Mondoux, Shawn
Mowbray, Fabrice
Worster, Andrew
Griffith, Lauren E
Tavares, Walter
Miller, Paul
Hanel, Erich
Aryal, Komal
Sivakumaran, Ravi
Costa, Andrew P
author_sort Strum, Ryan P
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that may have been suitable for safe management in a subacute or virtual clinical setting. The EDAC has established face and content validity but has not been tested against a reference standard as a criterion. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective is to examine the agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements in retrospectively identifying ED visits suitable for subacute care management. Our secondary objective is to assess the validity of ED physicians’ judgement as a criterion standard. Our tertiary objective is to examine how the ED physician’s perception of a virtual ED care alternative correlates with the EDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised single-centre, single-blinded agreement study. We will randomly select ED charts between 1 January and 31 December 2019 from an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED charts will be randomly assigned to participating ED physicians who will evaluate if this ED visit could have been managed appropriately and safely in a subacute and/or virtual model of care. Each chart will be reviewed by two physicians independently. We compute our needed sample size to be 79 charts. We will use kappa statistics to measure inter-rater agreement. A repeated measures regression model of physician ratings will provide variance estimates that we will use to assess the intraclass correlation of ED physician ratings and the EDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (2022-14625). If validated, the EDAC may provide an ED-based classification to identify potentially avoidable ED visits, monitor ED visit trends, and proactively delineate those best suited for subacute or virtual care models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9764606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97646062022-12-21 Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol Strum, Ryan P Mondoux, Shawn Mowbray, Fabrice Worster, Andrew Griffith, Lauren E Tavares, Walter Miller, Paul Hanel, Erich Aryal, Komal Sivakumaran, Ravi Costa, Andrew P BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that may have been suitable for safe management in a subacute or virtual clinical setting. The EDAC has established face and content validity but has not been tested against a reference standard as a criterion. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective is to examine the agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements in retrospectively identifying ED visits suitable for subacute care management. Our secondary objective is to assess the validity of ED physicians’ judgement as a criterion standard. Our tertiary objective is to examine how the ED physician’s perception of a virtual ED care alternative correlates with the EDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised single-centre, single-blinded agreement study. We will randomly select ED charts between 1 January and 31 December 2019 from an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED charts will be randomly assigned to participating ED physicians who will evaluate if this ED visit could have been managed appropriately and safely in a subacute and/or virtual model of care. Each chart will be reviewed by two physicians independently. We compute our needed sample size to be 79 charts. We will use kappa statistics to measure inter-rater agreement. A repeated measures regression model of physician ratings will provide variance estimates that we will use to assess the intraclass correlation of ED physician ratings and the EDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (2022-14625). If validated, the EDAC may provide an ED-based classification to identify potentially avoidable ED visits, monitor ED visit trends, and proactively delineate those best suited for subacute or virtual care models. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9764606/ /pubmed/36526315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Strum, Ryan P
Mondoux, Shawn
Mowbray, Fabrice
Worster, Andrew
Griffith, Lauren E
Tavares, Walter
Miller, Paul
Hanel, Erich
Aryal, Komal
Sivakumaran, Ravi
Costa, Andrew P
Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title_full Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title_fullStr Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title_short Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
title_sort validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488
work_keys_str_mv AT strumryanp validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT mondouxshawn validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT mowbrayfabrice validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT worsterandrew validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT griffithlaurene validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT tavareswalter validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT millerpaul validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT hanelerich validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT aryalkomal validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT sivakumaranravi validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol
AT costaandrewp validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol