Cargando…
Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol
INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488 |
_version_ | 1784853308522889216 |
---|---|
author | Strum, Ryan P Mondoux, Shawn Mowbray, Fabrice Worster, Andrew Griffith, Lauren E Tavares, Walter Miller, Paul Hanel, Erich Aryal, Komal Sivakumaran, Ravi Costa, Andrew P |
author_facet | Strum, Ryan P Mondoux, Shawn Mowbray, Fabrice Worster, Andrew Griffith, Lauren E Tavares, Walter Miller, Paul Hanel, Erich Aryal, Komal Sivakumaran, Ravi Costa, Andrew P |
author_sort | Strum, Ryan P |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that may have been suitable for safe management in a subacute or virtual clinical setting. The EDAC has established face and content validity but has not been tested against a reference standard as a criterion. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective is to examine the agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements in retrospectively identifying ED visits suitable for subacute care management. Our secondary objective is to assess the validity of ED physicians’ judgement as a criterion standard. Our tertiary objective is to examine how the ED physician’s perception of a virtual ED care alternative correlates with the EDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised single-centre, single-blinded agreement study. We will randomly select ED charts between 1 January and 31 December 2019 from an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED charts will be randomly assigned to participating ED physicians who will evaluate if this ED visit could have been managed appropriately and safely in a subacute and/or virtual model of care. Each chart will be reviewed by two physicians independently. We compute our needed sample size to be 79 charts. We will use kappa statistics to measure inter-rater agreement. A repeated measures regression model of physician ratings will provide variance estimates that we will use to assess the intraclass correlation of ED physician ratings and the EDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (2022-14625). If validated, the EDAC may provide an ED-based classification to identify potentially avoidable ED visits, monitor ED visit trends, and proactively delineate those best suited for subacute or virtual care models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9764606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97646062022-12-21 Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol Strum, Ryan P Mondoux, Shawn Mowbray, Fabrice Worster, Andrew Griffith, Lauren E Tavares, Walter Miller, Paul Hanel, Erich Aryal, Komal Sivakumaran, Ravi Costa, Andrew P BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Redirecting suitable patients from the emergency department (ED) to alternative subacute settings may assist in reducing ED overcrowding while delivering equivalent care. The Emergency Department Avoidance Classification (EDAC) was constructed to retrospectively classify ED visits that may have been suitable for safe management in a subacute or virtual clinical setting. The EDAC has established face and content validity but has not been tested against a reference standard as a criterion. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective is to examine the agreement between the EDAC and ED physician judgements in retrospectively identifying ED visits suitable for subacute care management. Our secondary objective is to assess the validity of ED physicians’ judgement as a criterion standard. Our tertiary objective is to examine how the ED physician’s perception of a virtual ED care alternative correlates with the EDAC. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised single-centre, single-blinded agreement study. We will randomly select ED charts between 1 January and 31 December 2019 from an academic hospital in Hamilton, Canada. ED charts will be randomly assigned to participating ED physicians who will evaluate if this ED visit could have been managed appropriately and safely in a subacute and/or virtual model of care. Each chart will be reviewed by two physicians independently. We compute our needed sample size to be 79 charts. We will use kappa statistics to measure inter-rater agreement. A repeated measures regression model of physician ratings will provide variance estimates that we will use to assess the intraclass correlation of ED physician ratings and the EDAC. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (2022-14625). If validated, the EDAC may provide an ED-based classification to identify potentially avoidable ED visits, monitor ED visit trends, and proactively delineate those best suited for subacute or virtual care models. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9764606/ /pubmed/36526315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Strum, Ryan P Mondoux, Shawn Mowbray, Fabrice Worster, Andrew Griffith, Lauren E Tavares, Walter Miller, Paul Hanel, Erich Aryal, Komal Sivakumaran, Ravi Costa, Andrew P Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title | Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title_full | Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title_fullStr | Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title_short | Validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
title_sort | validation of a classification to identify emergency department visits suitable for subacute and virtual care models: a randomised single-blinded agreement study protocol |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36526315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068488 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT strumryanp validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT mondouxshawn validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT mowbrayfabrice validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT worsterandrew validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT griffithlaurene validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT tavareswalter validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT millerpaul validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT hanelerich validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT aryalkomal validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT sivakumaranravi validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol AT costaandrewp validationofaclassificationtoidentifyemergencydepartmentvisitssuitableforsubacuteandvirtualcaremodelsarandomisedsingleblindedagreementstudyprotocol |