Cargando…
Functional connectivity of the default mode network subsystems in patients with major depressive episodes with mixed features
BACKGROUND: The neuroimaging mechanism of major depressive episodes with mixed features (MMF) is not clear. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the functional connectivity of the default mode network (DMN) subsystems among patients with MMF and patients with major depressive disorder without mixed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2022-100929 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The neuroimaging mechanism of major depressive episodes with mixed features (MMF) is not clear. AIMS: This study aimed to investigate the functional connectivity of the default mode network (DMN) subsystems among patients with MMF and patients with major depressive disorder without mixed features (MDD(noMF)). METHODS: This study recruited 47 patients with MDD(noMF) and 27 patients with MMF from Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, between April 2021 and June 2022. Forty-five healthy controls (HCs) were recruited. All subjects underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning and clinical assessments. Intranetwork and internetwork functional connectivity were computed in the DMN core subsystem, dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC) subsystem and medial temporal lobe (MTL) subsystem. Analysis of covariance method was performed to compare the intranetwork and internetwork functional connectivity in the DMN subsystems among the MDD(noMF), MMF and HC groups. RESULTS: The functional connectivity within the DMN core (F=6.32, p(FDR)=0.008) and MTL subsystems (F=4.45, p(FDR)=0.021) showed significant differences among the MDD(noMF), MMF and HC groups. Compared with the HC group, the patients with MDD(noMF) and MMF had increased functional connectivity within the DMN MTL subsystem, and the patients with MMF also showed increased functional connectivity within the DMN core subsystem. Meanwhile, compared with the MDD(noMF), the patients with MMF had increased functional connectivity within the DMN core subsystem (mean difference (MDD(noMF)−MMF)=−0.08, SE=0.04, p=0.048). However, no significant differences were found within the DMN dMPFC subsystem and all the internetwork functional connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated abnormal functional connectivity patterns of DMN subsystems in patients with MMF, findings potentially beneficial to deepen our understanding of MMF’s neural basis. |
---|