Cargando…
The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for patients with a variety of knee conditions. The main cause of aseptic TKA failure is implant loosening, which has been linked to poor cement mantle quality. Cementless components were introduced to offer better longer-term biolo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06974-7 |
_version_ | 1784853332950515712 |
---|---|
author | Tay, Mei Lin Zeng, Nina Holland, Sherina Bayan, Ali Farrington, Bill J. van Rooyen, Rupert Sharp, Rob Elliott, Robert S. J. Walker, Matthew L. Young, Simon W. |
author_facet | Tay, Mei Lin Zeng, Nina Holland, Sherina Bayan, Ali Farrington, Bill J. van Rooyen, Rupert Sharp, Rob Elliott, Robert S. J. Walker, Matthew L. Young, Simon W. |
author_sort | Tay, Mei Lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for patients with a variety of knee conditions. The main cause of aseptic TKA failure is implant loosening, which has been linked to poor cement mantle quality. Cementless components were introduced to offer better longer-term biological fixation through osseointegration; however, early designs led to increased rate of revision due to a lack of initial press-fit and bony ingrowth. Newer highly porous metal designs may alleviate this issue but randomised data of fully uncemented TKA (tibial, femoral, patella) is lacking. The aim of the Knee-Fix study is to investigate the long-term implant survival and patient outcomes of fully uncemented compared with cemented fixation in TKA. Our study hypothesis was that uncemented TKA would be as clinically reliable and durable as the gold-standard cemented TKA. METHODS: The Knee-Fix study is a two-arm, single-blinded, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial with 160 patients in each arm and follow-up at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years and 10 years. The primary outcome of interest is implant fixation, which will be measured by assessment of postoperative progressive radiolucencies with the Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Secondary outcome measures are patient-reported outcomes, measured using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), International Knee Society System (IKSS), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L), VAS Pain, Patient Satisfaction Score and Net Promoter Score. DISCUSSION: While cemented fixation remains the gold standard, a growing proportion of TKA are now implanted cementless. Highly porous metal cementless components for TKA can offer several benefits including potentially improved biological fixation; however, long-term outcomes need further investigation. This prospective study will help discern long-term differences between the two techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001624471. Registered trial name: Knee-Fix study (Cemented vs Uncemented Total Knee Replacement). Registered on 24 November 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9764727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97647272022-12-21 The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty Tay, Mei Lin Zeng, Nina Holland, Sherina Bayan, Ali Farrington, Bill J. van Rooyen, Rupert Sharp, Rob Elliott, Robert S. J. Walker, Matthew L. Young, Simon W. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure for patients with a variety of knee conditions. The main cause of aseptic TKA failure is implant loosening, which has been linked to poor cement mantle quality. Cementless components were introduced to offer better longer-term biological fixation through osseointegration; however, early designs led to increased rate of revision due to a lack of initial press-fit and bony ingrowth. Newer highly porous metal designs may alleviate this issue but randomised data of fully uncemented TKA (tibial, femoral, patella) is lacking. The aim of the Knee-Fix study is to investigate the long-term implant survival and patient outcomes of fully uncemented compared with cemented fixation in TKA. Our study hypothesis was that uncemented TKA would be as clinically reliable and durable as the gold-standard cemented TKA. METHODS: The Knee-Fix study is a two-arm, single-blinded, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial with 160 patients in each arm and follow-up at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years and 10 years. The primary outcome of interest is implant fixation, which will be measured by assessment of postoperative progressive radiolucencies with the Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System. Secondary outcome measures are patient-reported outcomes, measured using Oxford Knee Score (OKS), International Knee Society System (IKSS), Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L), VAS Pain, Patient Satisfaction Score and Net Promoter Score. DISCUSSION: While cemented fixation remains the gold standard, a growing proportion of TKA are now implanted cementless. Highly porous metal cementless components for TKA can offer several benefits including potentially improved biological fixation; however, long-term outcomes need further investigation. This prospective study will help discern long-term differences between the two techniques. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001624471. Registered trial name: Knee-Fix study (Cemented vs Uncemented Total Knee Replacement). Registered on 24 November 2016. BioMed Central 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9764727/ /pubmed/36539805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06974-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tay, Mei Lin Zeng, Nina Holland, Sherina Bayan, Ali Farrington, Bill J. van Rooyen, Rupert Sharp, Rob Elliott, Robert S. J. Walker, Matthew L. Young, Simon W. The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title | The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title_full | The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title_short | The Knee-Fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
title_sort | knee-fix study: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating cemented and cementless components in total knee arthroplasty |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06974-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taymeilin thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT zengnina thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT hollandsherina thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT bayanali thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT farringtonbillj thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT vanrooyenrupert thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT sharprob thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT elliottrobertsj thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT walkermatthewl thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT youngsimonw thekneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT taymeilin kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT zengnina kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT hollandsherina kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT bayanali kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT farringtonbillj kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT vanrooyenrupert kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT sharprob kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT elliottrobertsj kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT walkermatthewl kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty AT youngsimonw kneefixstudystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrialevaluatingcementedandcementlesscomponentsintotalkneearthroplasty |