Cargando…
Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging
OBJECTIVE: To characterize normative adult ranges for cochlear promontory thickness relevant to the development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes to rehabilitate various neurotologic disorders. PATIENTS: Adults (≥18 years). INTERVENTION: In vivo radiologic assessment using a 192‐slice C...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.965 |
_version_ | 1784853335002578944 |
---|---|
author | Marinelli, John P. Patel, Neil S. Lohse, Christine M. Lane, John I. Carlson, Matthew L. |
author_facet | Marinelli, John P. Patel, Neil S. Lohse, Christine M. Lane, John I. Carlson, Matthew L. |
author_sort | Marinelli, John P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To characterize normative adult ranges for cochlear promontory thickness relevant to the development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes to rehabilitate various neurotologic disorders. PATIENTS: Adults (≥18 years). INTERVENTION: In vivo radiologic assessment using a 192‐slice CT scanner (Force‐192; Siemens Healthcare) with ultrahigh‐resolution scan mode combined and iterative reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cochlear promontory thickness. RESULTS: Among 48 included patients (96 ears), the mean (SD) age was 56 (18) years (range 25–94) and included 25 (52%) women. Of that 12 patients (25%) had osteopenia (n = 6) or osteoporosis (n = 6). The mean (SD) body mass index was 28 (5) kg/m(2). The mean (SD) promontory thickness for the 96 temporal bones under study was 1.22 (0.24) mm (range 0.55–1.85). There was not a statistically significant association between age and promontory thickness (correlation coefficient .08; p = .44). Promontory thickness was significantly greater for men than women (mean 1.28 vs. 1.17 mm; p = .03) and increased with increasing body mass index (correlation coefficient .30; p = .004). Last, promontory thickness was significantly less for patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis compared with those without these conditions (mean 1.09 vs. 1.27 mm; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear promontory thickness can vary by almost 1.5 mm across patients and is significantly associated with patient sex, body mass index, and comorbid osteopenia/osteoporosis. Subendosteal and transpromontory electrode placement techniques must account for this degree of variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9764738 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97647382022-12-20 Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging Marinelli, John P. Patel, Neil S. Lohse, Christine M. Lane, John I. Carlson, Matthew L. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: To characterize normative adult ranges for cochlear promontory thickness relevant to the development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes to rehabilitate various neurotologic disorders. PATIENTS: Adults (≥18 years). INTERVENTION: In vivo radiologic assessment using a 192‐slice CT scanner (Force‐192; Siemens Healthcare) with ultrahigh‐resolution scan mode combined and iterative reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Cochlear promontory thickness. RESULTS: Among 48 included patients (96 ears), the mean (SD) age was 56 (18) years (range 25–94) and included 25 (52%) women. Of that 12 patients (25%) had osteopenia (n = 6) or osteoporosis (n = 6). The mean (SD) body mass index was 28 (5) kg/m(2). The mean (SD) promontory thickness for the 96 temporal bones under study was 1.22 (0.24) mm (range 0.55–1.85). There was not a statistically significant association between age and promontory thickness (correlation coefficient .08; p = .44). Promontory thickness was significantly greater for men than women (mean 1.28 vs. 1.17 mm; p = .03) and increased with increasing body mass index (correlation coefficient .30; p = .004). Last, promontory thickness was significantly less for patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis compared with those without these conditions (mean 1.09 vs. 1.27 mm; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear promontory thickness can vary by almost 1.5 mm across patients and is significantly associated with patient sex, body mass index, and comorbid osteopenia/osteoporosis. Subendosteal and transpromontory electrode placement techniques must account for this degree of variability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9764738/ /pubmed/36544948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.965 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience Marinelli, John P. Patel, Neil S. Lohse, Christine M. Lane, John I. Carlson, Matthew L. Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title | Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title_full | Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title_fullStr | Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title_short | Cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone CT imaging |
title_sort | cochlear promontory anatomy relevant to development of subendosteal and transpromontory electrodes using 192‐section ultra‐high resolution temporal bone ct imaging |
topic | Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764738/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinellijohnp cochlearpromontoryanatomyrelevanttodevelopmentofsubendostealandtranspromontoryelectrodesusing192sectionultrahighresolutiontemporalbonectimaging AT patelneils cochlearpromontoryanatomyrelevanttodevelopmentofsubendostealandtranspromontoryelectrodesusing192sectionultrahighresolutiontemporalbonectimaging AT lohsechristinem cochlearpromontoryanatomyrelevanttodevelopmentofsubendostealandtranspromontoryelectrodesusing192sectionultrahighresolutiontemporalbonectimaging AT lanejohni cochlearpromontoryanatomyrelevanttodevelopmentofsubendostealandtranspromontoryelectrodesusing192sectionultrahighresolutiontemporalbonectimaging AT carlsonmatthewl cochlearpromontoryanatomyrelevanttodevelopmentofsubendostealandtranspromontoryelectrodesusing192sectionultrahighresolutiontemporalbonectimaging |