Cargando…

Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy

OBJECTIVES: Examine accuracy and factors impacting accuracy for mandibular reconstruction with virtual surgical planning, 3D printed osteotomy guides and preoperatively bent mandibular reconstruction plate (VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate). METHOD: Retrospective review of osseous‐free‐flap mandibular reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Annino, Donald J., Sethi, Rosh K., Hansen, Elisabeth E., Horne, Sylvia, Dey, Tanujit, Rettig, Eleni M., Uppaluri, Ravindra, Kass, Jason I., Goguen, Laura A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.830
_version_ 1784853353469050880
author Annino, Donald J.
Sethi, Rosh K.
Hansen, Elisabeth E.
Horne, Sylvia
Dey, Tanujit
Rettig, Eleni M.
Uppaluri, Ravindra
Kass, Jason I.
Goguen, Laura A.
author_facet Annino, Donald J.
Sethi, Rosh K.
Hansen, Elisabeth E.
Horne, Sylvia
Dey, Tanujit
Rettig, Eleni M.
Uppaluri, Ravindra
Kass, Jason I.
Goguen, Laura A.
author_sort Annino, Donald J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Examine accuracy and factors impacting accuracy for mandibular reconstruction with virtual surgical planning, 3D printed osteotomy guides and preoperatively bent mandibular reconstruction plate (VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate). METHOD: Retrospective review of osseous‐free‐flap mandibular reconstructions with VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate between January 2015 and July 2020 at a single academic medical center. Patient demographics, disease, and treatment variables were extracted. Accuracy was assessed by 3D‐model‐overlay with cephalometric and donor‐bone segment length measurements. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors impacting cephalometric accuracy. RESULTS: 60 cases met criteria: 41 (68%) cancer, 14 (23%) osteoradionecrosis (ORN), 5 (8%) secondary mandibular reconstruction. Thirteen cases (22%) were Brown class III or IV. Thirty‐nine cases (65%) had ≥2 flap bone segments. Average donor‐bone length was 82 mm (SD: 28). 3D‐model‐overlay accuracy demonstrated minimal deviation between planned and actual reconstruction: intercondylar distance = 2.10 mm (SD: 2.2); intergonial distance = 2.23 mm (SD: 1.9); anterior–posterior distance (APD) = 1.76 mm (SD: 1.5); gonial angle (GA) = 3.11 degrees (SD: 2.4). Mean change in donor‐bone segment length inferiorly was 2.67 mm (SD: 2.6) and superiorly 3.27 mm (SD: 3.2). Higher number of donor‐bone segments was associated with decreased accuracy in GA (p = .023) and longer donor‐bone length was associated with decreased accuracy in APD (p = .031). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the largest series assessing surgical accuracy of VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate for osseous‐free‐flap mandibular reconstruction. We demonstrate highly accurate results, with increased number of donor‐bone segments and donor‐bone length associated with decreased accuracy. Our findings further support VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate as a reliable and accurate tool for mandibular reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9764818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97648182022-12-20 Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy Annino, Donald J. Sethi, Rosh K. Hansen, Elisabeth E. Horne, Sylvia Dey, Tanujit Rettig, Eleni M. Uppaluri, Ravindra Kass, Jason I. Goguen, Laura A. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology OBJECTIVES: Examine accuracy and factors impacting accuracy for mandibular reconstruction with virtual surgical planning, 3D printed osteotomy guides and preoperatively bent mandibular reconstruction plate (VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate). METHOD: Retrospective review of osseous‐free‐flap mandibular reconstructions with VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate between January 2015 and July 2020 at a single academic medical center. Patient demographics, disease, and treatment variables were extracted. Accuracy was assessed by 3D‐model‐overlay with cephalometric and donor‐bone segment length measurements. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors impacting cephalometric accuracy. RESULTS: 60 cases met criteria: 41 (68%) cancer, 14 (23%) osteoradionecrosis (ORN), 5 (8%) secondary mandibular reconstruction. Thirteen cases (22%) were Brown class III or IV. Thirty‐nine cases (65%) had ≥2 flap bone segments. Average donor‐bone length was 82 mm (SD: 28). 3D‐model‐overlay accuracy demonstrated minimal deviation between planned and actual reconstruction: intercondylar distance = 2.10 mm (SD: 2.2); intergonial distance = 2.23 mm (SD: 1.9); anterior–posterior distance (APD) = 1.76 mm (SD: 1.5); gonial angle (GA) = 3.11 degrees (SD: 2.4). Mean change in donor‐bone segment length inferiorly was 2.67 mm (SD: 2.6) and superiorly 3.27 mm (SD: 3.2). Higher number of donor‐bone segments was associated with decreased accuracy in GA (p = .023) and longer donor‐bone length was associated with decreased accuracy in APD (p = .031). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge this is the largest series assessing surgical accuracy of VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate for osseous‐free‐flap mandibular reconstruction. We demonstrate highly accurate results, with increased number of donor‐bone segments and donor‐bone length associated with decreased accuracy. Our findings further support VSP/3Dprinted‐guide/plate as a reliable and accurate tool for mandibular reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9764818/ /pubmed/36544971 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.830 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
Annino, Donald J.
Sethi, Rosh K.
Hansen, Elisabeth E.
Horne, Sylvia
Dey, Tanujit
Rettig, Eleni M.
Uppaluri, Ravindra
Kass, Jason I.
Goguen, Laura A.
Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title_full Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title_fullStr Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title_short Virtual planning and 3D‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: Factors impacting accuracy
title_sort virtual planning and 3d‐printed guides for mandibular reconstruction: factors impacting accuracy
topic Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9764818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544971
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.830
work_keys_str_mv AT anninodonaldj virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT sethiroshk virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT hansenelisabethe virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT hornesylvia virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT deytanujit virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT rettigelenim virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT uppaluriravindra virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT kassjasoni virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy
AT goguenlauraa virtualplanningand3dprintedguidesformandibularreconstructionfactorsimpactingaccuracy