Cargando…

Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region

Lockdowns due to COVID-19 in early 2020 had health, economic, and social consequences globally. Using survey data collected as part of a rapid assessment among non-governmental organization- (NGO) supported communities in six Asia Pacific countries (n = 13,522), this study examined if the early impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kang, Yunhee, Baidya, Anurima, Aaron, Alec, Wang, Jun, Chan, Christabel, Wetzler, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100580
_version_ 1784853392440426496
author Kang, Yunhee
Baidya, Anurima
Aaron, Alec
Wang, Jun
Chan, Christabel
Wetzler, Erica
author_facet Kang, Yunhee
Baidya, Anurima
Aaron, Alec
Wang, Jun
Chan, Christabel
Wetzler, Erica
author_sort Kang, Yunhee
collection PubMed
description Lockdowns due to COVID-19 in early 2020 had health, economic, and social consequences globally. Using survey data collected as part of a rapid assessment among non-governmental organization- (NGO) supported communities in six Asia Pacific countries (n = 13,522), this study examined if the early impacts of COVID-19 on job loss or reduced income, food expenditure, food availability at households and markets, and affordability of essential items, differed between rural and urban areas. Job loss or reduced income was higher in urban areas than in rural areas in India (91.2% vs. 82.5%), Myanmar (72.0% vs. 48.6%), and Vietnam (76.5% vs. 44.9%). While there was a significant decline in food expenditure in all six countries, there were significantly larger reductions in food expenditures in urban areas versus rural areas in India (35.2% vs. 24.0%), Myanmar (30.8% vs. 8.5%), and Vietnam (31.0% vs. 2.3%). Food stocks were less available in urban areas than in rural areas in Bangladesh (18.8% vs. 37.8%), India (91.5% vs.76.0%), and Myanmar (72.0% vs. 59.0%). Foods and essential items were largely available at markets, without significant differences between rural and urban areas, except in Vietnam. Full affordability was only 20%–30% for most items, with a trend of higher affordability of some items in urban areas than in rural areas. Recommendations to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 include promoting urban agriculture with efficient food distribution and cash support and supporting small-holder farmers for procurement and adequate functioning of the supply chain system in the region.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9765004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97650042022-12-21 Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region Kang, Yunhee Baidya, Anurima Aaron, Alec Wang, Jun Chan, Christabel Wetzler, Erica Glob Food Sec Article Lockdowns due to COVID-19 in early 2020 had health, economic, and social consequences globally. Using survey data collected as part of a rapid assessment among non-governmental organization- (NGO) supported communities in six Asia Pacific countries (n = 13,522), this study examined if the early impacts of COVID-19 on job loss or reduced income, food expenditure, food availability at households and markets, and affordability of essential items, differed between rural and urban areas. Job loss or reduced income was higher in urban areas than in rural areas in India (91.2% vs. 82.5%), Myanmar (72.0% vs. 48.6%), and Vietnam (76.5% vs. 44.9%). While there was a significant decline in food expenditure in all six countries, there were significantly larger reductions in food expenditures in urban areas versus rural areas in India (35.2% vs. 24.0%), Myanmar (30.8% vs. 8.5%), and Vietnam (31.0% vs. 2.3%). Food stocks were less available in urban areas than in rural areas in Bangladesh (18.8% vs. 37.8%), India (91.5% vs.76.0%), and Myanmar (72.0% vs. 59.0%). Foods and essential items were largely available at markets, without significant differences between rural and urban areas, except in Vietnam. Full affordability was only 20%–30% for most items, with a trend of higher affordability of some items in urban areas than in rural areas. Recommendations to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 include promoting urban agriculture with efficient food distribution and cash support and supporting small-holder farmers for procurement and adequate functioning of the supply chain system in the region. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-12 2021-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9765004/ /pubmed/36570721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100580 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Kang, Yunhee
Baidya, Anurima
Aaron, Alec
Wang, Jun
Chan, Christabel
Wetzler, Erica
Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title_full Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title_fullStr Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title_short Differences in the early impact of COVID-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the Asia Pacific Region
title_sort differences in the early impact of covid-19 on food security and livelihoods in rural and urban areas in the asia pacific region
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100580
work_keys_str_mv AT kangyunhee differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion
AT baidyaanurima differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion
AT aaronalec differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion
AT wangjun differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion
AT chanchristabel differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion
AT wetzlererica differencesintheearlyimpactofcovid19onfoodsecurityandlivelihoodsinruralandurbanareasintheasiapacificregion