Cargando…

Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention

Cholelithiasis (gallstones) is a very common medical problem worldwide, with 5-30% of patients demonstrating a combined condition of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones (CBDS)). CBDS are usually classified as primary or secondary stones. Primary CBDS are defined as stones...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mansour, Subhi, Kluger, Yoram, Khuri, Safi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578366
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4826
_version_ 1784853458561531904
author Mansour, Subhi
Kluger, Yoram
Khuri, Safi
author_facet Mansour, Subhi
Kluger, Yoram
Khuri, Safi
author_sort Mansour, Subhi
collection PubMed
description Cholelithiasis (gallstones) is a very common medical problem worldwide, with 5-30% of patients demonstrating a combined condition of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones (CBDS)). CBDS are usually classified as primary or secondary stones. Primary CBDS are defined as stones detected 2 years or more following cholecystectomy, while secondary stones, the most common type, usually migrate from the gallbladder to the bile ducts. Recurrent CBDS are defined as stones detected 6 months or more following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with complete duct clearance. Although ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy has emerged as the main therapeutic option for CBDS, with up to 95% bile duct clearance rate, up to 25% of said patients develop recurrent bile duct stones. Thus far, several issues related to recurrent CBDS are still unclear and questions regarding this specific pathology have no precise answers: how many trials of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy should be attempted before referring the patient for surgical management? Is there an association between risk factors and early surgical intervention? Thus, currently, there is no worldwide scientific-based consensus regarding the best management of this specific group of patients. The main issue for this article is to review the relevant English literature and find out the main high risk factors for recurrent CBDS, and form a diagnostic and treatment plan, hence, identifying the subgroup of patients that will benefit from early surgical management, preventing further ERCP-associated complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9765319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97653192022-12-27 Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention Mansour, Subhi Kluger, Yoram Khuri, Safi J Clin Med Res Review Cholelithiasis (gallstones) is a very common medical problem worldwide, with 5-30% of patients demonstrating a combined condition of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones (CBDS)). CBDS are usually classified as primary or secondary stones. Primary CBDS are defined as stones detected 2 years or more following cholecystectomy, while secondary stones, the most common type, usually migrate from the gallbladder to the bile ducts. Recurrent CBDS are defined as stones detected 6 months or more following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with complete duct clearance. Although ERCP with endoscopic sphincterotomy has emerged as the main therapeutic option for CBDS, with up to 95% bile duct clearance rate, up to 25% of said patients develop recurrent bile duct stones. Thus far, several issues related to recurrent CBDS are still unclear and questions regarding this specific pathology have no precise answers: how many trials of ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy should be attempted before referring the patient for surgical management? Is there an association between risk factors and early surgical intervention? Thus, currently, there is no worldwide scientific-based consensus regarding the best management of this specific group of patients. The main issue for this article is to review the relevant English literature and find out the main high risk factors for recurrent CBDS, and form a diagnostic and treatment plan, hence, identifying the subgroup of patients that will benefit from early surgical management, preventing further ERCP-associated complications. Elmer Press 2022-11 2022-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9765319/ /pubmed/36578366 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4826 Text en Copyright 2022, Mansour et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Mansour, Subhi
Kluger, Yoram
Khuri, Safi
Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title_full Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title_fullStr Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title_short Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
title_sort primary recurrent common bile duct stones: timing of surgical intervention
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9765319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36578366
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr4826
work_keys_str_mv AT mansoursubhi primaryrecurrentcommonbileductstonestimingofsurgicalintervention
AT klugeryoram primaryrecurrentcommonbileductstonestimingofsurgicalintervention
AT khurisafi primaryrecurrentcommonbileductstonestimingofsurgicalintervention