Cargando…
MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Often viewed as institutions primarily servings 18-to-24-year-old student populations, U.S. colleges and universities are age-diverse. In our recent national study of AFU institutions, 21 campuses maintaining age data reported that 12,718 faculty (39.24% of faculty) and 20,361 staff (42.31% of staff...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766162/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1062 |
_version_ | 1784853661933895680 |
---|---|
author | Bowen, Lauren Montepare, Joann Silverstein, Nina Whitbourne, Susan Beaulieu, Celeste |
author_facet | Bowen, Lauren Montepare, Joann Silverstein, Nina Whitbourne, Susan Beaulieu, Celeste |
author_sort | Bowen, Lauren |
collection | PubMed |
description | Often viewed as institutions primarily servings 18-to-24-year-old student populations, U.S. colleges and universities are age-diverse. In our recent national study of AFU institutions, 21 campuses maintaining age data reported that 12,718 faculty (39.24% of faculty) and 20,361 staff (42.31% of staff) were ages 50+. Additionally, 22 campuses reported 7,080 students (1.58%) ages 50+. Despite higher education’s attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), age is often overlooked; therefore, universities may need strategies for improving age inclusivity. Across 2,447 open-ended survey responses from our study, faculty, staff, and students describe experiences with age inclusivity (e.g., feeling valued) and exclusion (e.g., feeling unwelcome), and many call for greater sensitivity to aging in existing DEI efforts, such as more age-inclusive language in classrooms and attention to age bias in hiring and promotions. In addition, this presentation will examine responses that raise important considerations for integrating age inclusivity with other higher education DEI efforts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9766162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97661622022-12-20 MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION Bowen, Lauren Montepare, Joann Silverstein, Nina Whitbourne, Susan Beaulieu, Celeste Innov Aging Abstracts Often viewed as institutions primarily servings 18-to-24-year-old student populations, U.S. colleges and universities are age-diverse. In our recent national study of AFU institutions, 21 campuses maintaining age data reported that 12,718 faculty (39.24% of faculty) and 20,361 staff (42.31% of staff) were ages 50+. Additionally, 22 campuses reported 7,080 students (1.58%) ages 50+. Despite higher education’s attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), age is often overlooked; therefore, universities may need strategies for improving age inclusivity. Across 2,447 open-ended survey responses from our study, faculty, staff, and students describe experiences with age inclusivity (e.g., feeling valued) and exclusion (e.g., feeling unwelcome), and many call for greater sensitivity to aging in existing DEI efforts, such as more age-inclusive language in classrooms and attention to age bias in hiring and promotions. In addition, this presentation will examine responses that raise important considerations for integrating age inclusivity with other higher education DEI efforts. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766162/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1062 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Bowen, Lauren Montepare, Joann Silverstein, Nina Whitbourne, Susan Beaulieu, Celeste MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title | MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title_full | MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title_fullStr | MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title_full_unstemmed | MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title_short | MAKING THE CASE FOR AGE INCLUSIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION |
title_sort | making the case for age inclusivity in higher education |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766162/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowenlauren makingthecaseforageinclusivityinhighereducation AT monteparejoann makingthecaseforageinclusivityinhighereducation AT silversteinnina makingthecaseforageinclusivityinhighereducation AT whitbournesusan makingthecaseforageinclusivityinhighereducation AT beaulieuceleste makingthecaseforageinclusivityinhighereducation |