Cargando…

AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS

Hands-on experience is essential to gerontological education and associated with numerous student benefits. Much less is known about the community agency perspective, including why they do/don’t host gerontology interns. In this national study (n=281), non-profit, for-profit, and government aging-se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karasik, Rona, Greenberg, Phyllis, Kroeber, Maria, VanderWerf, Jessica, Zuniga, Claudia Burgos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766388/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1971
_version_ 1784853718135472128
author Karasik, Rona
Greenberg, Phyllis
Kroeber, Maria
VanderWerf, Jessica
Zuniga, Claudia Burgos
author_facet Karasik, Rona
Greenberg, Phyllis
Kroeber, Maria
VanderWerf, Jessica
Zuniga, Claudia Burgos
author_sort Karasik, Rona
collection PubMed
description Hands-on experience is essential to gerontological education and associated with numerous student benefits. Much less is known about the community agency perspective, including why they do/don’t host gerontology interns. In this national study (n=281), non-profit, for-profit, and government aging-service providers (e.g., Social Services, Health Care, Housing) were surveyed regarding their perceptions of internship benefits, challenges, and areas to improve. Unique to this study is the inclusion of both hosting (n=129) and non-hosting (n=142) agencies. Hosts’ reasons for accepting interns included: share experience/knowledge (n=81, 87%); future university relationships (n=71, 76%); intergenerational interaction for students (n=69, 74%) and clients (n=60, 65%); attract future employees (n=68, 73%); and fills unmet need at agency (n=47, 50%). Non-host reasons for abstaining included: lack of applicants (n=58, 41%); never considered it (n=40, 28%); insufficient staffing (n= 37, 26%); unsure where to start (n=34, 24%) or find/attract interns (n=34, 24%), and too time-consuming (n=25,18%). Additional reasons for nonparticipation included: lack of space; insufficient intern-suitable work; risk/liability; and agency policy. Both hosting and non-hosting agencies anticipated/realized student-related challenges (e.g., limited motivation, inconsistent availability, inadequate preparation) and agency-based factors (e.g., insufficient time, staffing). Given the ongoing need for suitable gerontology internship sites and the finding that almost half of the non-hosting agencies indicated possible future interest in accepting gerontology interns (n=80, 49%), attention to agency recommendations (e.g., increased faculty communication/feedback, stronger student commitment/preparation, recognition of agency contributions) is warranted. Strategies for addressing identified challenges and implementing requested changes to enhance the community agency experience with gerontology interns are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9766388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97663882022-12-20 AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS Karasik, Rona Greenberg, Phyllis Kroeber, Maria VanderWerf, Jessica Zuniga, Claudia Burgos Innov Aging Abstracts Hands-on experience is essential to gerontological education and associated with numerous student benefits. Much less is known about the community agency perspective, including why they do/don’t host gerontology interns. In this national study (n=281), non-profit, for-profit, and government aging-service providers (e.g., Social Services, Health Care, Housing) were surveyed regarding their perceptions of internship benefits, challenges, and areas to improve. Unique to this study is the inclusion of both hosting (n=129) and non-hosting (n=142) agencies. Hosts’ reasons for accepting interns included: share experience/knowledge (n=81, 87%); future university relationships (n=71, 76%); intergenerational interaction for students (n=69, 74%) and clients (n=60, 65%); attract future employees (n=68, 73%); and fills unmet need at agency (n=47, 50%). Non-host reasons for abstaining included: lack of applicants (n=58, 41%); never considered it (n=40, 28%); insufficient staffing (n= 37, 26%); unsure where to start (n=34, 24%) or find/attract interns (n=34, 24%), and too time-consuming (n=25,18%). Additional reasons for nonparticipation included: lack of space; insufficient intern-suitable work; risk/liability; and agency policy. Both hosting and non-hosting agencies anticipated/realized student-related challenges (e.g., limited motivation, inconsistent availability, inadequate preparation) and agency-based factors (e.g., insufficient time, staffing). Given the ongoing need for suitable gerontology internship sites and the finding that almost half of the non-hosting agencies indicated possible future interest in accepting gerontology interns (n=80, 49%), attention to agency recommendations (e.g., increased faculty communication/feedback, stronger student commitment/preparation, recognition of agency contributions) is warranted. Strategies for addressing identified challenges and implementing requested changes to enhance the community agency experience with gerontology interns are discussed. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766388/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1971 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Karasik, Rona
Greenberg, Phyllis
Kroeber, Maria
VanderWerf, Jessica
Zuniga, Claudia Burgos
AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title_full AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title_fullStr AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title_full_unstemmed AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title_short AGING AGENCIES’ AND PROVIDERS’ REASONS FOR HOSTING OR NOT HOSTING GERONTOLOGY INTERNS
title_sort aging agencies’ and providers’ reasons for hosting or not hosting gerontology interns
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766388/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.1971
work_keys_str_mv AT karasikrona agingagenciesandprovidersreasonsforhostingornothostinggerontologyinterns
AT greenbergphyllis agingagenciesandprovidersreasonsforhostingornothostinggerontologyinterns
AT kroebermaria agingagenciesandprovidersreasonsforhostingornothostinggerontologyinterns
AT vanderwerfjessica agingagenciesandprovidersreasonsforhostingornothostinggerontologyinterns
AT zunigaclaudiaburgos agingagenciesandprovidersreasonsforhostingornothostinggerontologyinterns