Cargando…

COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES

Essential contacts (ECs), people providing support/engagement to older adults, are vital to their physical and socio-emotional well-being. Research suggests that COVID-19 has significantly affected the connectedness of aging populations and their ECs, limiting interaction and potentially weakening s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karki, Dinesh, Hubner, Sarah, Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766392/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2187
_version_ 1784853719134765056
author Karki, Dinesh
Hubner, Sarah
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
author_facet Karki, Dinesh
Hubner, Sarah
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
author_sort Karki, Dinesh
collection PubMed
description Essential contacts (ECs), people providing support/engagement to older adults, are vital to their physical and socio-emotional well-being. Research suggests that COVID-19 has significantly affected the connectedness of aging populations and their ECs, limiting interaction and potentially weakening support networks. Assistive and interactive technologies (AITs) may be useful for mitigating disruptions by facilitating communication. The goal of this study was to explore AIT preferences and needs of ECs for connecting with adults aged 60+. Participants completed a Qualtrics survey via Amazon Mechanical Turk. An initial sample (N=580,MAge=44.3±14.3,White=81%) was collected (December 2020-February 2021). A minority sub-sample (N=79,MAge=38.9±11.6,Non-White=87.3%) was subsequently accrued (September-December 2021). Participants were initial/minority-ECs for community-dwelling (initial-CDECs=57%,minority-CDECs=89%) and institutionalized adults (initial-IECs=43%,minority-IECs=11%). Minority respondents overwhelmingly identified as CDECs. Results revealed that recent ,“daily/often” phone-based, video-based, and in-person communication were all, more-frequently reported in minority-ECs compared to the initial-EC sample. Phone-based communication was most-frequent in minority-IECs (61%,versus initial-IECs=49%), but was relatively ubiquitous among all (minority-CDECs=49%,initial-CDECs=43%). Initial-CDECs had the least video-based contact (17%); the remaining groups were relatively similar (minority-CDECs=36%,minority-IECs=33%,initial-IECs=32%). CDECs reported the most in-person communication (minority-CDECs=70%,versus initial-CDECs=49%); IECs reported the least (minority-IECs=44%, versus initial-IECs=14%,). Results suggest that this minority sub-set may communicate more, respectively. This may be influenced by population and data-collection-time differences. Still, CDECs may have maintained better access to in-person communication and relied less-heavily on distanced networks through the pandemic. Ultimately, individual characteristics (i.e., ethnicity) and experiences (i.e., COVID-19) may drive communication patterns and end-user needs; this could inform innovation. Future investigation into these topics is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9766392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97663922022-12-20 COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Karki, Dinesh Hubner, Sarah Boron, Julie Blaskewicz Innov Aging Abstracts Essential contacts (ECs), people providing support/engagement to older adults, are vital to their physical and socio-emotional well-being. Research suggests that COVID-19 has significantly affected the connectedness of aging populations and their ECs, limiting interaction and potentially weakening support networks. Assistive and interactive technologies (AITs) may be useful for mitigating disruptions by facilitating communication. The goal of this study was to explore AIT preferences and needs of ECs for connecting with adults aged 60+. Participants completed a Qualtrics survey via Amazon Mechanical Turk. An initial sample (N=580,MAge=44.3±14.3,White=81%) was collected (December 2020-February 2021). A minority sub-sample (N=79,MAge=38.9±11.6,Non-White=87.3%) was subsequently accrued (September-December 2021). Participants were initial/minority-ECs for community-dwelling (initial-CDECs=57%,minority-CDECs=89%) and institutionalized adults (initial-IECs=43%,minority-IECs=11%). Minority respondents overwhelmingly identified as CDECs. Results revealed that recent ,“daily/often” phone-based, video-based, and in-person communication were all, more-frequently reported in minority-ECs compared to the initial-EC sample. Phone-based communication was most-frequent in minority-IECs (61%,versus initial-IECs=49%), but was relatively ubiquitous among all (minority-CDECs=49%,initial-CDECs=43%). Initial-CDECs had the least video-based contact (17%); the remaining groups were relatively similar (minority-CDECs=36%,minority-IECs=33%,initial-IECs=32%). CDECs reported the most in-person communication (minority-CDECs=70%,versus initial-CDECs=49%); IECs reported the least (minority-IECs=44%, versus initial-IECs=14%,). Results suggest that this minority sub-set may communicate more, respectively. This may be influenced by population and data-collection-time differences. Still, CDECs may have maintained better access to in-person communication and relied less-heavily on distanced networks through the pandemic. Ultimately, individual characteristics (i.e., ethnicity) and experiences (i.e., COVID-19) may drive communication patterns and end-user needs; this could inform innovation. Future investigation into these topics is warranted. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766392/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2187 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Karki, Dinesh
Hubner, Sarah
Boron, Julie Blaskewicz
COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title_full COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title_fullStr COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title_full_unstemmed COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title_short COMMUNICATION BETWEEN OLDER ADULTS AND ESSENTIAL CONTACTS: ISOLATION AND ASSISTIVE AND INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
title_sort communication between older adults and essential contacts: isolation and assistive and interactive technologies
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766392/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2187
work_keys_str_mv AT karkidinesh communicationbetweenolderadultsandessentialcontactsisolationandassistiveandinteractivetechnologies
AT hubnersarah communicationbetweenolderadultsandessentialcontactsisolationandassistiveandinteractivetechnologies
AT boronjulieblaskewicz communicationbetweenolderadultsandessentialcontactsisolationandassistiveandinteractivetechnologies