Cargando…

THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION

Pattern separation studies suggest age-related declines in discriminating between a newly and a previously encountered overlapping mental representations. However, when similar experiences occur contemporaneously, shared features may serve as intrinsic factors that interfere with the ability to enco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chien, Jessie, Eich, Teal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766426/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2063
_version_ 1784853726955044864
author Chien, Jessie
Eich, Teal
author_facet Chien, Jessie
Eich, Teal
author_sort Chien, Jessie
collection PubMed
description Pattern separation studies suggest age-related declines in discriminating between a newly and a previously encountered overlapping mental representations. However, when similar experiences occur contemporaneously, shared features may serve as intrinsic factors that interfere with the ability to encode and retrieve events as distinct memories. If so, successful inhibition of competitors might also be necessary to maintain memory specificity. Here, we investigated the interplay between memory specificity and inhibitory control in younger (20-35;n=34) and older (65+;n=37) adults by testing whether and how presenting a target item with a lure item (varied in its similarity to the target) influenced recognition accuracy, probed using a 3-item (target, lure, and a non-presented control) forced-choice recognition test. Surprisingly, we found no age-related differences, including in target accuracy, which was high in both groups (young=80.25%; older=77.86%). While not age-specific, we did find that the pattern of errors varied as a function of the level of similarity between the items at encoding. When target and lure were highly similar, a greater proportion of control items were falsely-recognized relative to lure items. It is possible that inhibition of the lure spread to the target, leaving both inaccessible at retrieval (e.g., a retrieval-induced forgetting effect). When the target and lure were less similar, participants false alarmed more to lure than control, potentially because the lure provided less competition and thus did not necessitate inhibitory control. These results shed light on how inhibitory processes might be differentially involved, but age-invariant, depending on the similarity of encoded items.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9766426
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97664262022-12-20 THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION Chien, Jessie Eich, Teal Innov Aging Abstracts Pattern separation studies suggest age-related declines in discriminating between a newly and a previously encountered overlapping mental representations. However, when similar experiences occur contemporaneously, shared features may serve as intrinsic factors that interfere with the ability to encode and retrieve events as distinct memories. If so, successful inhibition of competitors might also be necessary to maintain memory specificity. Here, we investigated the interplay between memory specificity and inhibitory control in younger (20-35;n=34) and older (65+;n=37) adults by testing whether and how presenting a target item with a lure item (varied in its similarity to the target) influenced recognition accuracy, probed using a 3-item (target, lure, and a non-presented control) forced-choice recognition test. Surprisingly, we found no age-related differences, including in target accuracy, which was high in both groups (young=80.25%; older=77.86%). While not age-specific, we did find that the pattern of errors varied as a function of the level of similarity between the items at encoding. When target and lure were highly similar, a greater proportion of control items were falsely-recognized relative to lure items. It is possible that inhibition of the lure spread to the target, leaving both inaccessible at retrieval (e.g., a retrieval-induced forgetting effect). When the target and lure were less similar, participants false alarmed more to lure than control, potentially because the lure provided less competition and thus did not necessitate inhibitory control. These results shed light on how inhibitory processes might be differentially involved, but age-invariant, depending on the similarity of encoded items. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766426/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2063 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Chien, Jessie
Eich, Teal
THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title_full THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title_fullStr THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title_full_unstemmed THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title_short THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN MEMORY SPECIFICITY AND COGNITIVE INHIBITION
title_sort interplay between memory specificity and cognitive inhibition
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766426/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2063
work_keys_str_mv AT chienjessie theinterplaybetweenmemoryspecificityandcognitiveinhibition
AT eichteal theinterplaybetweenmemoryspecificityandcognitiveinhibition
AT chienjessie interplaybetweenmemoryspecificityandcognitiveinhibition
AT eichteal interplaybetweenmemoryspecificityandcognitiveinhibition