Cargando…
CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028 |
_version_ | 1784853801622044672 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Jinjiao Shen, Jenny Conwell, Yeates Nathan, Kobi Yu, Fang Ramsdale, Erika Fick, Donna Simmons, Sandra |
author_facet | Wang, Jinjiao Shen, Jenny Conwell, Yeates Nathan, Kobi Yu, Fang Ramsdale, Erika Fick, Donna Simmons, Sandra |
author_sort | Wang, Jinjiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescribing unnecessary medications. This review aimed to assess the degree to which the 4Ms were considered in intervention design, sample selection, and outcome assessment in deprescribing trials by keyword search in six databases and snowballing. Thirty-seven of the 564 trials identified met the review eligibility criteria. Imbalanced consideration of 4Ms in the deprescribing trials was observed. Intervention design: “Medication” was considered in all trials; “Mentation” was considered in 8 trials; “Mobility” (n=2) and “What Matters” (n=6) was less often considered. By targeting providers, most of the trials lacked consideration of patient-centeredness - aligning what matters most to older adults and their families with deprescribing decision making and implementation. Sample selection: “Medication” was considered in 15 trials (e.g., samples including patients taking ≥ 5 medications or specific types of medications), whereas “Mentation” (n=6), “Mobility” (n=6) and “What Matters” (n=0) were less often considered. Outcome assessment: “Medication” was the most commonly assessed outcomes (n=33), followed by “Mobility” (n=13) and “Mentation” (n=10) outcomes, with no study examining “What Matters” outcomes. 4Ms were not purposefully considered in the intervention design, sample selection, and outcome measurement of existing deprescribing trials. Future deprescribing trials need a more balanced and complete consideration of the 4Ms in the trial design and implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9766729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97667292022-12-20 CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW Wang, Jinjiao Shen, Jenny Conwell, Yeates Nathan, Kobi Yu, Fang Ramsdale, Erika Fick, Donna Simmons, Sandra Innov Aging Abstracts The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescribing unnecessary medications. This review aimed to assess the degree to which the 4Ms were considered in intervention design, sample selection, and outcome assessment in deprescribing trials by keyword search in six databases and snowballing. Thirty-seven of the 564 trials identified met the review eligibility criteria. Imbalanced consideration of 4Ms in the deprescribing trials was observed. Intervention design: “Medication” was considered in all trials; “Mentation” was considered in 8 trials; “Mobility” (n=2) and “What Matters” (n=6) was less often considered. By targeting providers, most of the trials lacked consideration of patient-centeredness - aligning what matters most to older adults and their families with deprescribing decision making and implementation. Sample selection: “Medication” was considered in 15 trials (e.g., samples including patients taking ≥ 5 medications or specific types of medications), whereas “Mentation” (n=6), “Mobility” (n=6) and “What Matters” (n=0) were less often considered. Outcome assessment: “Medication” was the most commonly assessed outcomes (n=33), followed by “Mobility” (n=13) and “Mentation” (n=10) outcomes, with no study examining “What Matters” outcomes. 4Ms were not purposefully considered in the intervention design, sample selection, and outcome measurement of existing deprescribing trials. Future deprescribing trials need a more balanced and complete consideration of the 4Ms in the trial design and implementation. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Wang, Jinjiao Shen, Jenny Conwell, Yeates Nathan, Kobi Yu, Fang Ramsdale, Erika Fick, Donna Simmons, Sandra CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title | CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title_full | CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title_fullStr | CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title_full_unstemmed | CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title_short | CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW |
title_sort | considerations of age-friendly 4m principles in deprescribing interventions: a scoping review |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjinjiao considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT shenjenny considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT conwellyeates considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT nathankobi considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT yufang considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT ramsdaleerika considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT fickdonna considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview AT simmonssandra considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview |