Cargando…

CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW

The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Jinjiao, Shen, Jenny, Conwell, Yeates, Nathan, Kobi, Yu, Fang, Ramsdale, Erika, Fick, Donna, Simmons, Sandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766729/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028
_version_ 1784853801622044672
author Wang, Jinjiao
Shen, Jenny
Conwell, Yeates
Nathan, Kobi
Yu, Fang
Ramsdale, Erika
Fick, Donna
Simmons, Sandra
author_facet Wang, Jinjiao
Shen, Jenny
Conwell, Yeates
Nathan, Kobi
Yu, Fang
Ramsdale, Erika
Fick, Donna
Simmons, Sandra
author_sort Wang, Jinjiao
collection PubMed
description The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescribing unnecessary medications. This review aimed to assess the degree to which the 4Ms were considered in intervention design, sample selection, and outcome assessment in deprescribing trials by keyword search in six databases and snowballing. Thirty-seven of the 564 trials identified met the review eligibility criteria. Imbalanced consideration of 4Ms in the deprescribing trials was observed. Intervention design: “Medication” was considered in all trials; “Mentation” was considered in 8 trials; “Mobility” (n=2) and “What Matters” (n=6) was less often considered. By targeting providers, most of the trials lacked consideration of patient-centeredness - aligning what matters most to older adults and their families with deprescribing decision making and implementation. Sample selection: “Medication” was considered in 15 trials (e.g., samples including patients taking ≥ 5 medications or specific types of medications), whereas “Mentation” (n=6), “Mobility” (n=6) and “What Matters” (n=0) were less often considered. Outcome assessment: “Medication” was the most commonly assessed outcomes (n=33), followed by “Mobility” (n=13) and “Mentation” (n=10) outcomes, with no study examining “What Matters” outcomes. 4Ms were not purposefully considered in the intervention design, sample selection, and outcome measurement of existing deprescribing trials. Future deprescribing trials need a more balanced and complete consideration of the 4Ms in the trial design and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9766729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97667292022-12-20 CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW Wang, Jinjiao Shen, Jenny Conwell, Yeates Nathan, Kobi Yu, Fang Ramsdale, Erika Fick, Donna Simmons, Sandra Innov Aging Abstracts The 4Ms – Medication, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters - represent the key components in the Age-Friendly Health Systems initiative and provide a conceptual framework for research in the older adult population. Over 40% of older adults experience polypharmacy, which can be addressed by deprescribing unnecessary medications. This review aimed to assess the degree to which the 4Ms were considered in intervention design, sample selection, and outcome assessment in deprescribing trials by keyword search in six databases and snowballing. Thirty-seven of the 564 trials identified met the review eligibility criteria. Imbalanced consideration of 4Ms in the deprescribing trials was observed. Intervention design: “Medication” was considered in all trials; “Mentation” was considered in 8 trials; “Mobility” (n=2) and “What Matters” (n=6) was less often considered. By targeting providers, most of the trials lacked consideration of patient-centeredness - aligning what matters most to older adults and their families with deprescribing decision making and implementation. Sample selection: “Medication” was considered in 15 trials (e.g., samples including patients taking ≥ 5 medications or specific types of medications), whereas “Mentation” (n=6), “Mobility” (n=6) and “What Matters” (n=0) were less often considered. Outcome assessment: “Medication” was the most commonly assessed outcomes (n=33), followed by “Mobility” (n=13) and “Mentation” (n=10) outcomes, with no study examining “What Matters” outcomes. 4Ms were not purposefully considered in the intervention design, sample selection, and outcome measurement of existing deprescribing trials. Future deprescribing trials need a more balanced and complete consideration of the 4Ms in the trial design and implementation. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9766729/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Wang, Jinjiao
Shen, Jenny
Conwell, Yeates
Nathan, Kobi
Yu, Fang
Ramsdale, Erika
Fick, Donna
Simmons, Sandra
CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title_full CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title_fullStr CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title_short CONSIDERATIONS OF AGE-FRIENDLY 4M PRINCIPLES IN DEPRESCRIBING INTERVENTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW
title_sort considerations of age-friendly 4m principles in deprescribing interventions: a scoping review
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9766729/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2028
work_keys_str_mv AT wangjinjiao considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT shenjenny considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT conwellyeates considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT nathankobi considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT yufang considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT ramsdaleerika considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT fickdonna considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview
AT simmonssandra considerationsofagefriendly4mprinciplesindeprescribinginterventionsascopingreview