Cargando…

Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Vasoactive drugs are one of the most common patient-related barriers to early mobilization. Little is known about the hemodynamic effects of early mobilization on patients receiving vasoactive drugs. This study aims to observe and describe the impact of mobilization on the vital signs of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borges, Larissa Faria, Fraga Righetti, Renato, de Souza Francisco, Davi, Pereira Yamaguti, Wellington, Barros, Cassia Fabiane De
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279269
_version_ 1784853949393666048
author Borges, Larissa Faria
Fraga Righetti, Renato
de Souza Francisco, Davi
Pereira Yamaguti, Wellington
Barros, Cassia Fabiane De
author_facet Borges, Larissa Faria
Fraga Righetti, Renato
de Souza Francisco, Davi
Pereira Yamaguti, Wellington
Barros, Cassia Fabiane De
author_sort Borges, Larissa Faria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vasoactive drugs are one of the most common patient-related barriers to early mobilization. Little is known about the hemodynamic effects of early mobilization on patients receiving vasoactive drugs. This study aims to observe and describe the impact of mobilization on the vital signs of critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs as well as the occurrence of adverse events. METHODS: This is a cohort study performed in an Intensive Care Unit with patients receiving vasoactive drugs. All patients, either mobilized or non-mobilized, had their clinical data such as vital signs [heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation], type and dosage of the vasoactive drug, and respiratory support collected at rest. For mobilized patients, the vital signs were also collected after mobilization, and so was the highest level of mobility achieved and the occurrence of adverse events. The criteria involved in the decision of mobilizing the patients were registered. RESULTS: 53 patients were included in this study and 222 physiotherapy sessions were monitored. In most of the sessions (n = 150, 67.6%), patients were mobilized despite the use of vasoactive drugs. There was a statistically significant increase in heart rate and respiratory rate after mobilization when compared to rest (p<0.05). Only two (1.3%) out of 150 mobilizations presented an adverse event. Most of the time, non-mobilizations were justified by the existence of a clinical contraindication (n = 61, 84.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The alterations observed in the vital signs of mobilized patients may have reflected physiological adjustments of patients’ cardiovascular and respiratory systems to the increase in physical demand imposed by the early mobilization. The adverse events were rare, not serious, and reversed through actions such as a minimal increase of the vasoactive drug dosage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97673582022-12-21 Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study Borges, Larissa Faria Fraga Righetti, Renato de Souza Francisco, Davi Pereira Yamaguti, Wellington Barros, Cassia Fabiane De PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Vasoactive drugs are one of the most common patient-related barriers to early mobilization. Little is known about the hemodynamic effects of early mobilization on patients receiving vasoactive drugs. This study aims to observe and describe the impact of mobilization on the vital signs of critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs as well as the occurrence of adverse events. METHODS: This is a cohort study performed in an Intensive Care Unit with patients receiving vasoactive drugs. All patients, either mobilized or non-mobilized, had their clinical data such as vital signs [heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and oxygen saturation], type and dosage of the vasoactive drug, and respiratory support collected at rest. For mobilized patients, the vital signs were also collected after mobilization, and so was the highest level of mobility achieved and the occurrence of adverse events. The criteria involved in the decision of mobilizing the patients were registered. RESULTS: 53 patients were included in this study and 222 physiotherapy sessions were monitored. In most of the sessions (n = 150, 67.6%), patients were mobilized despite the use of vasoactive drugs. There was a statistically significant increase in heart rate and respiratory rate after mobilization when compared to rest (p<0.05). Only two (1.3%) out of 150 mobilizations presented an adverse event. Most of the time, non-mobilizations were justified by the existence of a clinical contraindication (n = 61, 84.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The alterations observed in the vital signs of mobilized patients may have reflected physiological adjustments of patients’ cardiovascular and respiratory systems to the increase in physical demand imposed by the early mobilization. The adverse events were rare, not serious, and reversed through actions such as a minimal increase of the vasoactive drug dosage. Public Library of Science 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9767358/ /pubmed/36538515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279269 Text en © 2022 Borges et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Borges, Larissa Faria
Fraga Righetti, Renato
de Souza Francisco, Davi
Pereira Yamaguti, Wellington
Barros, Cassia Fabiane De
Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title_full Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title_short Hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: A prospective cohort study
title_sort hemodynamic impact of early mobilization in critical patients receiving vasoactive drugs: a prospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36538515
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279269
work_keys_str_mv AT borgeslarissafaria hemodynamicimpactofearlymobilizationincriticalpatientsreceivingvasoactivedrugsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT fragarighettirenato hemodynamicimpactofearlymobilizationincriticalpatientsreceivingvasoactivedrugsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT desouzafranciscodavi hemodynamicimpactofearlymobilizationincriticalpatientsreceivingvasoactivedrugsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT pereirayamagutiwellington hemodynamicimpactofearlymobilizationincriticalpatientsreceivingvasoactivedrugsaprospectivecohortstudy
AT barroscassiafabianede hemodynamicimpactofearlymobilizationincriticalpatientsreceivingvasoactivedrugsaprospectivecohortstudy