Cargando…

National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019

OBJECTIVE: To provide an insight into trends in corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice in the UK, including criteria for progression of corneal ectasia, identification of patients for CXL, the CXL procedure itself and post-operative management. METHODS: All ophthalmologist members of the UK Cross-link...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayes, Sally, Jaycock, Philip, Rees, Nicholas, Figueiredo, Francisco C., O’Brart, David P. S., Meek, Keith M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02365-z
_version_ 1784853957437292544
author Hayes, Sally
Jaycock, Philip
Rees, Nicholas
Figueiredo, Francisco C.
O’Brart, David P. S.
Meek, Keith M.
author_facet Hayes, Sally
Jaycock, Philip
Rees, Nicholas
Figueiredo, Francisco C.
O’Brart, David P. S.
Meek, Keith M.
author_sort Hayes, Sally
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To provide an insight into trends in corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice in the UK, including criteria for progression of corneal ectasia, identification of patients for CXL, the CXL procedure itself and post-operative management. METHODS: All ophthalmologist members of the UK Cross-linking (UK-CXL) Consortium were invited to complete an online survey about CXL practice for the year 2019. The data collected was anonymised by site and analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Responses were received from 16 individual CXL centres (16/38; 42% response rate) and the data represented ~2,000 CXL procedures performed in the UK in 2019. The commonest indication for CXL was progressive keratoconus. Between centres, there were variations in diagnostic evaluation, patient selection for CXL, the CXL procedure and the pre- and post-operative monitoring of patients. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the wide number of CXL treatment techniques described in the published literature world-wide, variations in the monitoring of corneal ectasia, indications for CXL, CXL practice and post-CXL follow-up were found to exist between UK-based CXL centres.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97673932022-12-21 National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019 Hayes, Sally Jaycock, Philip Rees, Nicholas Figueiredo, Francisco C. O’Brart, David P. S. Meek, Keith M. Eye (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: To provide an insight into trends in corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice in the UK, including criteria for progression of corneal ectasia, identification of patients for CXL, the CXL procedure itself and post-operative management. METHODS: All ophthalmologist members of the UK Cross-linking (UK-CXL) Consortium were invited to complete an online survey about CXL practice for the year 2019. The data collected was anonymised by site and analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Responses were received from 16 individual CXL centres (16/38; 42% response rate) and the data represented ~2,000 CXL procedures performed in the UK in 2019. The commonest indication for CXL was progressive keratoconus. Between centres, there were variations in diagnostic evaluation, patient selection for CXL, the CXL procedure and the pre- and post-operative monitoring of patients. CONCLUSION: Consistent with the wide number of CXL treatment techniques described in the published literature world-wide, variations in the monitoring of corneal ectasia, indications for CXL, CXL practice and post-CXL follow-up were found to exist between UK-based CXL centres. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-20 2023-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9767393/ /pubmed/36539601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02365-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hayes, Sally
Jaycock, Philip
Rees, Nicholas
Figueiredo, Francisco C.
O’Brart, David P. S.
Meek, Keith M.
National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title_full National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title_fullStr National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title_full_unstemmed National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title_short National survey of corneal cross-linking (CXL) practice patterns in the United Kingdom during 2019
title_sort national survey of corneal cross-linking (cxl) practice patterns in the united kingdom during 2019
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02365-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hayessally nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019
AT jaycockphilip nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019
AT reesnicholas nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019
AT figueiredofranciscoc nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019
AT obrartdavidps nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019
AT meekkeithm nationalsurveyofcornealcrosslinkingcxlpracticepatternsintheunitedkingdomduring2019