Cargando…

COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN

BACKGROUND: Type of ostomy closure has connection with some complications and also cosmetic effects. AIMS: This study aimed to compare result of colostomy closure using purse-string method versus linear method in terms of surgical site infection, surgical time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Askarpour, Shahnam, Peyvasteh, Mehran, Farhadi, Farbod, Javaherizadeh, Hazhir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36542007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020220002e1709
_version_ 1784853962916102144
author Askarpour, Shahnam
Peyvasteh, Mehran
Farhadi, Farbod
Javaherizadeh, Hazhir
author_facet Askarpour, Shahnam
Peyvasteh, Mehran
Farhadi, Farbod
Javaherizadeh, Hazhir
author_sort Askarpour, Shahnam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type of ostomy closure has connection with some complications and also cosmetic effects. AIMS: This study aimed to compare result of colostomy closure using purse-string method versus linear method in terms of surgical site infection, surgical time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this study, 50 patients who underwent purse-string ostomy closure and 50 patients who underwent linear closure were included. Two groups were compared for surgical time, wound infection, patient satisfaction, scar length. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Wound infection was not reported among purse-string group compared to 10% in linear group (p=0.022). Scar length was 24.09±0.1 mm in purse string and 52.15±1.0 mm in linear group (p=0.033). Duration of hospital admission was significantly shorter in purse-string group (6.4±1.1 days) compared to linear (15.5±4.6 days, p=0.0001). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scale for observer (p=0.038) and parents (p=0.045) was more favorable among purse-string group compared to linear. CONCLUSION: Purse-string technique has the less frequent surgical site infection, shorter duration of hospital admission, less scar length, and more favorable cosmetic outcome, compared to linear technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97674202022-12-21 COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN Askarpour, Shahnam Peyvasteh, Mehran Farhadi, Farbod Javaherizadeh, Hazhir Arq Bras Cir Dig Original Article-Technique BACKGROUND: Type of ostomy closure has connection with some complications and also cosmetic effects. AIMS: This study aimed to compare result of colostomy closure using purse-string method versus linear method in terms of surgical site infection, surgical time, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: In this study, 50 patients who underwent purse-string ostomy closure and 50 patients who underwent linear closure were included. Two groups were compared for surgical time, wound infection, patient satisfaction, scar length. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Wound infection was not reported among purse-string group compared to 10% in linear group (p=0.022). Scar length was 24.09±0.1 mm in purse string and 52.15±1.0 mm in linear group (p=0.033). Duration of hospital admission was significantly shorter in purse-string group (6.4±1.1 days) compared to linear (15.5±4.6 days, p=0.0001). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scale for observer (p=0.038) and parents (p=0.045) was more favorable among purse-string group compared to linear. CONCLUSION: Purse-string technique has the less frequent surgical site infection, shorter duration of hospital admission, less scar length, and more favorable cosmetic outcome, compared to linear technique. Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9767420/ /pubmed/36542007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020220002e1709 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article-Technique
Askarpour, Shahnam
Peyvasteh, Mehran
Farhadi, Farbod
Javaherizadeh, Hazhir
COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title_full COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title_fullStr COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title_short COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
title_sort comparison between ostomy closure using purse-string versus linear in children
topic Original Article-Technique
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36542007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020220002e1709
work_keys_str_mv AT askarpourshahnam comparisonbetweenostomyclosureusingpursestringversuslinearinchildren
AT peyvastehmehran comparisonbetweenostomyclosureusingpursestringversuslinearinchildren
AT farhadifarbod comparisonbetweenostomyclosureusingpursestringversuslinearinchildren
AT javaherizadehhazhir comparisonbetweenostomyclosureusingpursestringversuslinearinchildren