Cargando…

Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on trends in nationwide cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures in the United States before and during the global COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand contemporary EP procedural trends and how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them. METHODS: Trends w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Monte, Baykaner, Tina, Bunch, T. Jared, Piccini, Jonathan P., Russo, Andrea M., Tzou, Wendy S., Zeitler, Emily P., Steinberg, Benjamin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.12.005
_version_ 1784854050699739136
author Scott, Monte
Baykaner, Tina
Bunch, T. Jared
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Russo, Andrea M.
Tzou, Wendy S.
Zeitler, Emily P.
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
author_facet Scott, Monte
Baykaner, Tina
Bunch, T. Jared
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Russo, Andrea M.
Tzou, Wendy S.
Zeitler, Emily P.
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
author_sort Scott, Monte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited data on trends in nationwide cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures in the United States before and during the global COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand contemporary EP procedural trends and how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them. METHODS: Trends were obtained from publicly reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2013 to 2020 (latest available). Rates of catheter-based EP procedures (EP studies and ablations) and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures were analyzed. All procedural rates were calculated per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries (year specific). Procedure physician subspecialty was also reported. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2019, annual rate of all cardiac EP procedures increased from 817.91 to 1089.68 per 100,000 beneficiaries. Catheter-based EP procedures increased from 323.73 to 675.01, while CIED rates decreased from 494.18 to 414.67. While all ablation procedures increased over time, relative proportion of ablation procedures being pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) increased (9.9% of ablations in 2013, to 18.2% in 2019). In 2020, rates of both catheter-based EP procedures and CIED procedures decreased; however, PVI share of ablation continued to increase in 2020 comprising 25.2% of ablation procedures. CONCLUSION: Rates of EP procedures have increased among Medicare beneficiaries, with catheter-based procedures now eclipsing CIEDs. Additionally, a greater proportion of catheter-based EP procedures are PVI, but they still represent a minority of all ablations. In 2020, rates of EP procedures were attenuated, yet the proportion of PVI ablations increased to over one-fourth of ablation procedures. These data have important implications for the EP workforce.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97678782022-12-21 Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic Scott, Monte Baykaner, Tina Bunch, T. Jared Piccini, Jonathan P. Russo, Andrea M. Tzou, Wendy S. Zeitler, Emily P. Steinberg, Benjamin A. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: There are limited data on trends in nationwide cardiac electrophysiology (EP) procedures in the United States before and during the global COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to understand contemporary EP procedural trends and how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them. METHODS: Trends were obtained from publicly reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2013 to 2020 (latest available). Rates of catheter-based EP procedures (EP studies and ablations) and cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures were analyzed. All procedural rates were calculated per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries (year specific). Procedure physician subspecialty was also reported. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2019, annual rate of all cardiac EP procedures increased from 817.91 to 1089.68 per 100,000 beneficiaries. Catheter-based EP procedures increased from 323.73 to 675.01, while CIED rates decreased from 494.18 to 414.67. While all ablation procedures increased over time, relative proportion of ablation procedures being pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) increased (9.9% of ablations in 2013, to 18.2% in 2019). In 2020, rates of both catheter-based EP procedures and CIED procedures decreased; however, PVI share of ablation continued to increase in 2020 comprising 25.2% of ablation procedures. CONCLUSION: Rates of EP procedures have increased among Medicare beneficiaries, with catheter-based procedures now eclipsing CIEDs. Additionally, a greater proportion of catheter-based EP procedures are PVI, but they still represent a minority of all ablations. In 2020, rates of EP procedures were attenuated, yet the proportion of PVI ablations increased to over one-fourth of ablation procedures. These data have important implications for the EP workforce. Elsevier 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9767878/ /pubmed/36569386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.12.005 Text en © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical
Scott, Monte
Baykaner, Tina
Bunch, T. Jared
Piccini, Jonathan P.
Russo, Andrea M.
Tzou, Wendy S.
Zeitler, Emily P.
Steinberg, Benjamin A.
Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title_full Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title_fullStr Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title_short Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemic
title_sort contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the united states, and impact of a global pandemic
topic Clinical
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT scottmonte contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT baykanertina contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT bunchtjared contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT piccinijonathanp contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT russoandream contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT tzouwendys contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT zeitleremilyp contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic
AT steinbergbenjamina contemporarytrendsincardiacelectrophysiologyproceduresintheunitedstatesandimpactofaglobalpandemic