Cargando…

Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound

The use of speech as a digital biomarker to detect stress levels is increasingly gaining attention. Yet, heterogeneous effects of stress on specific acoustic speech features have been observed, possibly due to previous studies’ use of different stress labels/categories and the lack of solid stress i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kappen, Mitchel, van der Donckt, Jonas, Vanhollebeke, Gert, Allaert, Jens, Degraeve, Vic, Madhu, Nilesh, Van Hoecke, Sofie, Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26375-9
_version_ 1784854058362732544
author Kappen, Mitchel
van der Donckt, Jonas
Vanhollebeke, Gert
Allaert, Jens
Degraeve, Vic
Madhu, Nilesh
Van Hoecke, Sofie
Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
author_facet Kappen, Mitchel
van der Donckt, Jonas
Vanhollebeke, Gert
Allaert, Jens
Degraeve, Vic
Madhu, Nilesh
Van Hoecke, Sofie
Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
author_sort Kappen, Mitchel
collection PubMed
description The use of speech as a digital biomarker to detect stress levels is increasingly gaining attention. Yet, heterogeneous effects of stress on specific acoustic speech features have been observed, possibly due to previous studies’ use of different stress labels/categories and the lack of solid stress induction paradigms or validation of experienced stress. Here, we deployed a controlled, within-subject psychosocial stress induction experiment in which participants received both neutral (control condition) and negative (negative condition) comparative feedback after solving a challenging cognitive task. This study is the first to use a (non-actor) within-participant design that verifies a successful stress induction using both self-report (i.e., decreased reported valence) and physiological measures (i.e., increased heart rate acceleration using event-related cardiac responses during feedback exposure). Analyses of acoustic speech features showed a significant increase in Fundamental Frequency (F0) and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio (HNR), and a significant decrease in shimmer during the negative feedback condition. Our results using read-out-loud speech comply with earlier research, yet we are the first to validate these results in a well-controlled but ecologically-valid setting to guarantee the generalization of our findings to real-life settings. Further research should aim to replicate these results in a free speech setting to test the robustness of our findings for real-world settings and should include semantics to also take into account what you say and not only how you say it.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97679142022-12-22 Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound Kappen, Mitchel van der Donckt, Jonas Vanhollebeke, Gert Allaert, Jens Degraeve, Vic Madhu, Nilesh Van Hoecke, Sofie Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne Sci Rep Article The use of speech as a digital biomarker to detect stress levels is increasingly gaining attention. Yet, heterogeneous effects of stress on specific acoustic speech features have been observed, possibly due to previous studies’ use of different stress labels/categories and the lack of solid stress induction paradigms or validation of experienced stress. Here, we deployed a controlled, within-subject psychosocial stress induction experiment in which participants received both neutral (control condition) and negative (negative condition) comparative feedback after solving a challenging cognitive task. This study is the first to use a (non-actor) within-participant design that verifies a successful stress induction using both self-report (i.e., decreased reported valence) and physiological measures (i.e., increased heart rate acceleration using event-related cardiac responses during feedback exposure). Analyses of acoustic speech features showed a significant increase in Fundamental Frequency (F0) and Harmonics-to-Noise Ratio (HNR), and a significant decrease in shimmer during the negative feedback condition. Our results using read-out-loud speech comply with earlier research, yet we are the first to validate these results in a well-controlled but ecologically-valid setting to guarantee the generalization of our findings to real-life settings. Further research should aim to replicate these results in a free speech setting to test the robustness of our findings for real-world settings and should include semantics to also take into account what you say and not only how you say it. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9767914/ /pubmed/36539505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26375-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kappen, Mitchel
van der Donckt, Jonas
Vanhollebeke, Gert
Allaert, Jens
Degraeve, Vic
Madhu, Nilesh
Van Hoecke, Sofie
Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title_full Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title_fullStr Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title_short Acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
title_sort acoustic speech features in social comparison: how stress impacts the way you sound
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26375-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kappenmitchel acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT vanderdoncktjonas acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT vanhollebekegert acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT allaertjens acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT degraevevic acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT madhunilesh acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT vanhoeckesofie acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound
AT vanderhasseltmarieanne acousticspeechfeaturesinsocialcomparisonhowstressimpactsthewayyousound