Cargando…

A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer

INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. At the same time, it is also the fourth most deadly cancer. Early detection of cancer exists as a guide for the treatment of gastric cancer. Nowadays, computer technology has advanced rapidly to assist physicians in the diagn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Weiming, Chen, Haoyuan, Liu, Wanli, Li, Xiaoyan, Sun, Hongzan, Huang, Xinyu, Grzegorzek, Marcin, Li, Chen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1072109
_version_ 1784854065287528448
author Hu, Weiming
Chen, Haoyuan
Liu, Wanli
Li, Xiaoyan
Sun, Hongzan
Huang, Xinyu
Grzegorzek, Marcin
Li, Chen
author_facet Hu, Weiming
Chen, Haoyuan
Liu, Wanli
Li, Xiaoyan
Sun, Hongzan
Huang, Xinyu
Grzegorzek, Marcin
Li, Chen
author_sort Hu, Weiming
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. At the same time, it is also the fourth most deadly cancer. Early detection of cancer exists as a guide for the treatment of gastric cancer. Nowadays, computer technology has advanced rapidly to assist physicians in the diagnosis of pathological pictures of gastric cancer. Ensemble learning is a way to improve the accuracy of algorithms, and finding multiple learning models with complementarity types is the basis of ensemble learning. Therefore, this paper compares the performance of multiple algorithms in anticipation of applying ensemble learning to a practical gastric cancer classification problem. METHODS: The complementarity of sub-size pathology image classifiers when machine performance is insufficient is explored in this experimental platform. We choose seven classical machine learning classifiers and four deep learning classifiers for classification experiments on the GasHisSDB database. Among them, classical machine learning algorithms extract five different image virtual features to match multiple classifier algorithms. For deep learning, we choose three convolutional neural network classifiers. In addition, we also choose a novel Transformer-based classifier. RESULTS: The experimental platform, in which a large number of classical machine learning and deep learning methods are performed, demonstrates that there are differences in the performance of different classifiers on GasHisSDB. Classical machine learning models exist for classifiers that classify Abnormal categories very well, while classifiers that excel in classifying Normal categories also exist. Deep learning models also exist with multiple models that can be complementarity. DISCUSSION: Suitable classifiers are selected for ensemble learning, when machine performance is insufficient. This experimental platform demonstrates that multiple classifiers are indeed complementarity and can improve the efficiency of ensemble learning. This can better assist doctors in diagnosis, improve the detection of gastric cancer, and increase the cure rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9767945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97679452022-12-22 A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer Hu, Weiming Chen, Haoyuan Liu, Wanli Li, Xiaoyan Sun, Hongzan Huang, Xinyu Grzegorzek, Marcin Li, Chen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world. At the same time, it is also the fourth most deadly cancer. Early detection of cancer exists as a guide for the treatment of gastric cancer. Nowadays, computer technology has advanced rapidly to assist physicians in the diagnosis of pathological pictures of gastric cancer. Ensemble learning is a way to improve the accuracy of algorithms, and finding multiple learning models with complementarity types is the basis of ensemble learning. Therefore, this paper compares the performance of multiple algorithms in anticipation of applying ensemble learning to a practical gastric cancer classification problem. METHODS: The complementarity of sub-size pathology image classifiers when machine performance is insufficient is explored in this experimental platform. We choose seven classical machine learning classifiers and four deep learning classifiers for classification experiments on the GasHisSDB database. Among them, classical machine learning algorithms extract five different image virtual features to match multiple classifier algorithms. For deep learning, we choose three convolutional neural network classifiers. In addition, we also choose a novel Transformer-based classifier. RESULTS: The experimental platform, in which a large number of classical machine learning and deep learning methods are performed, demonstrates that there are differences in the performance of different classifiers on GasHisSDB. Classical machine learning models exist for classifiers that classify Abnormal categories very well, while classifiers that excel in classifying Normal categories also exist. Deep learning models also exist with multiple models that can be complementarity. DISCUSSION: Suitable classifiers are selected for ensemble learning, when machine performance is insufficient. This experimental platform demonstrates that multiple classifiers are indeed complementarity and can improve the efficiency of ensemble learning. This can better assist doctors in diagnosis, improve the detection of gastric cancer, and increase the cure rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9767945/ /pubmed/36569152 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1072109 Text en Copyright © 2022 Hu, Chen, Liu, Li, Sun, Huang, Grzegorzek and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Hu, Weiming
Chen, Haoyuan
Liu, Wanli
Li, Xiaoyan
Sun, Hongzan
Huang, Xinyu
Grzegorzek, Marcin
Li, Chen
A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title_full A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title_fullStr A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title_short A comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: From linear regression to visual transformer
title_sort comparative study of gastric histopathology sub-size image classification: from linear regression to visual transformer
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9767945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36569152
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1072109
work_keys_str_mv AT huweiming acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT chenhaoyuan acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT liuwanli acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT lixiaoyan acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT sunhongzan acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT huangxinyu acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT grzegorzekmarcin acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT lichen acomparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT huweiming comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT chenhaoyuan comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT liuwanli comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT lixiaoyan comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT sunhongzan comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT huangxinyu comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT grzegorzekmarcin comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer
AT lichen comparativestudyofgastrichistopathologysubsizeimageclassificationfromlinearregressiontovisualtransformer