Cargando…

Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors

BACKGROUND: To minimize the risk of disease transmission in cornea transplantation, donor screening for blood-derived viral infections is mandatory. Ideally, pre-mortem blood samples are used, but based on availability, cadaveric blood samples of cornea donors may also be used. However, serological...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohmer, Niko, Kortenbusch, Marhild, Berger, Annemarie, Rühl, Cornelia, Ciesek, Sandra, Salla, Sabine, Rabenau, Holger F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524250
_version_ 1784854132921729024
author Kohmer, Niko
Kortenbusch, Marhild
Berger, Annemarie
Rühl, Cornelia
Ciesek, Sandra
Salla, Sabine
Rabenau, Holger F.
author_facet Kohmer, Niko
Kortenbusch, Marhild
Berger, Annemarie
Rühl, Cornelia
Ciesek, Sandra
Salla, Sabine
Rabenau, Holger F.
author_sort Kohmer, Niko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To minimize the risk of disease transmission in cornea transplantation, donor screening for blood-derived viral infections is mandatory. Ideally, pre-mortem blood samples are used, but based on availability, cadaveric blood samples of cornea donors may also be used. However, serological and nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) need to be validated for the use of cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) 1/2, and Treponema pallidum (syphilis)-specific serological and/or NAT assays were validated on different platforms (Abbott Alinity i, Alinity m, Roche Cobas 6800, and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM)) using (un)spiked paired pre- and post-mortem cornea donor blood samples from the same individual (up to 23.83 h after death) of 28 individuals in accordance with the specifications of the German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut [PEI]). In addition, routinely HBV-, HCV- and HIV-PCR-negative tested post-mortem blood samples of 24 individuals were used to assess NAT specificity. RESULTS: For the majority of serological parameters on the Abbott Alinity i (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, anti-HIV, anti-HTLV 1/2, and anti-Treponema pallidum), ratios of generated test results of (un)spiked paired pre- and post-mortem blood samples differed ≤25%, with an agreement of qualitative pre- and post-mortem test results ranging from 91.2 to 100%. For NAT parameters (HBV, HCV, and HIV) on the Cobas 6800, Alinity m, and CAP/CTM, no significant deviation in virus concentrations (factor >5) of spiked pre- and post-mortem blood samples could be observed. Ct-values of corresponding internal controls did also not differ significantly (>1.5 Ct-values). In addition, no false-positive test results were generated when specificity was assessed. CONCLUSION: Overall, fluctuations of test results for serological and NAT parameters in pre- and post-mortem blood samples examined in this study, were only limited and within the range of what is also observed when routinely testing fresh patient specimens. We conclude that all examined assays are eligible for the screening of blood samples taken up to about 24 h after the occurrence of death.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97682922023-01-17 Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors Kohmer, Niko Kortenbusch, Marhild Berger, Annemarie Rühl, Cornelia Ciesek, Sandra Salla, Sabine Rabenau, Holger F. Transfus Med Hemother Research Article BACKGROUND: To minimize the risk of disease transmission in cornea transplantation, donor screening for blood-derived viral infections is mandatory. Ideally, pre-mortem blood samples are used, but based on availability, cadaveric blood samples of cornea donors may also be used. However, serological and nucleic acid amplification tests (NATs) need to be validated for the use of cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV) 1/2, and Treponema pallidum (syphilis)-specific serological and/or NAT assays were validated on different platforms (Abbott Alinity i, Alinity m, Roche Cobas 6800, and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM)) using (un)spiked paired pre- and post-mortem cornea donor blood samples from the same individual (up to 23.83 h after death) of 28 individuals in accordance with the specifications of the German Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines (Paul-Ehrlich-Institut [PEI]). In addition, routinely HBV-, HCV- and HIV-PCR-negative tested post-mortem blood samples of 24 individuals were used to assess NAT specificity. RESULTS: For the majority of serological parameters on the Abbott Alinity i (HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, anti-HCV, anti-HIV, anti-HTLV 1/2, and anti-Treponema pallidum), ratios of generated test results of (un)spiked paired pre- and post-mortem blood samples differed ≤25%, with an agreement of qualitative pre- and post-mortem test results ranging from 91.2 to 100%. For NAT parameters (HBV, HCV, and HIV) on the Cobas 6800, Alinity m, and CAP/CTM, no significant deviation in virus concentrations (factor >5) of spiked pre- and post-mortem blood samples could be observed. Ct-values of corresponding internal controls did also not differ significantly (>1.5 Ct-values). In addition, no false-positive test results were generated when specificity was assessed. CONCLUSION: Overall, fluctuations of test results for serological and NAT parameters in pre- and post-mortem blood samples examined in this study, were only limited and within the range of what is also observed when routinely testing fresh patient specimens. We conclude that all examined assays are eligible for the screening of blood samples taken up to about 24 h after the occurrence of death. S. Karger AG 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9768292/ /pubmed/36654977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524250 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Usage, derivative works and distribution are permitted provided that proper credit is given to the author and the original publisher.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kohmer, Niko
Kortenbusch, Marhild
Berger, Annemarie
Rühl, Cornelia
Ciesek, Sandra
Salla, Sabine
Rabenau, Holger F.
Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title_full Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title_fullStr Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title_short Suitability of Different Diagnostic Platforms for Virological Testing of Blood Samples from Cornea Donors
title_sort suitability of different diagnostic platforms for virological testing of blood samples from cornea donors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36654977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000524250
work_keys_str_mv AT kohmerniko suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT kortenbuschmarhild suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT bergerannemarie suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT ruhlcornelia suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT cieseksandra suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT sallasabine suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors
AT rabenauholgerf suitabilityofdifferentdiagnosticplatformsforvirologicaltestingofbloodsamplesfromcorneadonors