Cargando…

Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs

INTRODUCTION: Urethral thickness measurements can be indicative of the pathological state of a patient; however to the best of our knowledge, no measurement reference range has been established in small-breed dogs. This study aimed to establish reference ranges for total urethral thickness and ureth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Geunha, Ji, Yewon, Choo, Donghyeok, Kim, Sung-Soo, Lee, Kichang, Yoon, Hakyoung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1051898
_version_ 1784854141252665344
author Kim, Geunha
Ji, Yewon
Choo, Donghyeok
Kim, Sung-Soo
Lee, Kichang
Yoon, Hakyoung
author_facet Kim, Geunha
Ji, Yewon
Choo, Donghyeok
Kim, Sung-Soo
Lee, Kichang
Yoon, Hakyoung
author_sort Kim, Geunha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Urethral thickness measurements can be indicative of the pathological state of a patient; however to the best of our knowledge, no measurement reference range has been established in small-breed dogs. This study aimed to establish reference ranges for total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in healthy small-breed dogs; “urethral wall thickness” was assumed to be 1/2 of the “total urethral thickness.” METHODS: Total urethral thickness was measured by ultrasonography in 240 healthy small-breed dogs. In both female and male dogs, the thickness was measured in the mid-sagittal plane. In female dogs, it was measured immediately before the pelvic bone. In male dogs, it was measured caudal to the prostate and cranial to the pelvic bone. The total urethral thickness we measured is the total thickness of the collapsed urethra, which is the sum of the thicknesses of the dorsal and ventral urethral wall. RESULTS: The mean value of total urethral thickness was 3.15 ± 0.83 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.58 ± 0.41 mm) in 240 small-breed dogs. The total urethral thickness was significantly greater in male dogs than in female dogs (p < 0.001), even when compared among the same breeds (p < 0.05). The mean value of the total urethral thickness in females was 2.78 ± 0.60 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.39 ± 0.30 mm), and 3.53 ± 0.86 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.76 ± 0.43 mm) in males. There was very weak positive correlation between body weight (BW) and total urethral thickness (R2 = 0.109; β = 0.330; p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.986 (p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability measured by ICC was 0.966 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study described the differences in total urethral thickness between breeds, sexes, and sterilization status, and the correlation between BW and total urethral thickness. Furthermore, this is the first study to provide reference ranges of total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in small-breed dogs using ultrasonography, and is expected to be useful for urethral evaluation in veterinary diagnostic imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97683292022-12-22 Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs Kim, Geunha Ji, Yewon Choo, Donghyeok Kim, Sung-Soo Lee, Kichang Yoon, Hakyoung Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science INTRODUCTION: Urethral thickness measurements can be indicative of the pathological state of a patient; however to the best of our knowledge, no measurement reference range has been established in small-breed dogs. This study aimed to establish reference ranges for total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in healthy small-breed dogs; “urethral wall thickness” was assumed to be 1/2 of the “total urethral thickness.” METHODS: Total urethral thickness was measured by ultrasonography in 240 healthy small-breed dogs. In both female and male dogs, the thickness was measured in the mid-sagittal plane. In female dogs, it was measured immediately before the pelvic bone. In male dogs, it was measured caudal to the prostate and cranial to the pelvic bone. The total urethral thickness we measured is the total thickness of the collapsed urethra, which is the sum of the thicknesses of the dorsal and ventral urethral wall. RESULTS: The mean value of total urethral thickness was 3.15 ± 0.83 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.58 ± 0.41 mm) in 240 small-breed dogs. The total urethral thickness was significantly greater in male dogs than in female dogs (p < 0.001), even when compared among the same breeds (p < 0.05). The mean value of the total urethral thickness in females was 2.78 ± 0.60 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.39 ± 0.30 mm), and 3.53 ± 0.86 mm (urethral wall thickness, 1.76 ± 0.43 mm) in males. There was very weak positive correlation between body weight (BW) and total urethral thickness (R2 = 0.109; β = 0.330; p < 0.001). Intraobserver reliability measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.986 (p < 0.001) and interobserver reliability measured by ICC was 0.966 (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study described the differences in total urethral thickness between breeds, sexes, and sterilization status, and the correlation between BW and total urethral thickness. Furthermore, this is the first study to provide reference ranges of total urethral thickness and urethral wall thickness in small-breed dogs using ultrasonography, and is expected to be useful for urethral evaluation in veterinary diagnostic imaging. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9768329/ /pubmed/36570510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1051898 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kim, Ji, Choo, Kim, Lee and Yoon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Kim, Geunha
Ji, Yewon
Choo, Donghyeok
Kim, Sung-Soo
Lee, Kichang
Yoon, Hakyoung
Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title_full Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title_fullStr Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title_short Evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
title_sort evaluation of urethral thickness using ultrasonography in healthy small-breed dogs
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1051898
work_keys_str_mv AT kimgeunha evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs
AT jiyewon evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs
AT choodonghyeok evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs
AT kimsungsoo evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs
AT leekichang evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs
AT yoonhakyoung evaluationofurethralthicknessusingultrasonographyinhealthysmallbreeddogs