Cargando…

Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule

This study aimed at implementing practice to build a standardized protocol to test the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms for pulmonary nodules. A test dataset was established according to a standardized procedure, including data collection, curation and annotation. Six types o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hao, Tang, Na, Zhang, Chao, Hao, Ye, Meng, Xiangfeng, Li, Jiage
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1071673
_version_ 1784854149977866240
author Wang, Hao
Tang, Na
Zhang, Chao
Hao, Ye
Meng, Xiangfeng
Li, Jiage
author_facet Wang, Hao
Tang, Na
Zhang, Chao
Hao, Ye
Meng, Xiangfeng
Li, Jiage
author_sort Wang, Hao
collection PubMed
description This study aimed at implementing practice to build a standardized protocol to test the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms for pulmonary nodules. A test dataset was established according to a standardized procedure, including data collection, curation and annotation. Six types of pulmonary nodules were manually annotated as reference standard. Three specific rules to match algorithm output with reference standard were applied and compared. These rules included: (1) “center hit” [whether the center of algorithm highlighted region of interest (ROI) hit the ROI of reference standard]; (2) “center distance” (whether the distance between algorithm highlighted ROI center and reference standard center was below a certain threshold); (3) “area overlap” (whether the overlap between algorithm highlighted ROI and reference standard was above a certain threshold). Performance metrics were calculated and the results were compared among ten algorithms under test (AUTs). The test set currently consisted of CT sequences from 593 patients. Under “center hit” rule, the average recall rate, average precision, and average F(1) score of ten algorithms under test were 54.68, 38.19, and 42.39%, respectively. Correspondingly, the results under “center distance” rule were 55.43, 38.69, and 42.96%, and the results under “area overlap” rule were 40.35, 27.75, and 31.13%. Among the six types of pulmonary nodules, the AUTs showed the highest miss rate for pure ground-glass nodules, with an average of 59.32%, followed by pleural nodules and solid nodules, with an average of 49.80 and 42.21%, respectively. The algorithm testing results changed along with specific matching methods adopted in the testing process. The AUTs showed uneven performance on different types of pulmonary nodules. This centralized testing protocol supports the comparison between algorithms with similar intended use, and helps evaluate algorithm performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97683652022-12-22 Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule Wang, Hao Tang, Na Zhang, Chao Hao, Ye Meng, Xiangfeng Li, Jiage Front Public Health Public Health This study aimed at implementing practice to build a standardized protocol to test the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms for pulmonary nodules. A test dataset was established according to a standardized procedure, including data collection, curation and annotation. Six types of pulmonary nodules were manually annotated as reference standard. Three specific rules to match algorithm output with reference standard were applied and compared. These rules included: (1) “center hit” [whether the center of algorithm highlighted region of interest (ROI) hit the ROI of reference standard]; (2) “center distance” (whether the distance between algorithm highlighted ROI center and reference standard center was below a certain threshold); (3) “area overlap” (whether the overlap between algorithm highlighted ROI and reference standard was above a certain threshold). Performance metrics were calculated and the results were compared among ten algorithms under test (AUTs). The test set currently consisted of CT sequences from 593 patients. Under “center hit” rule, the average recall rate, average precision, and average F(1) score of ten algorithms under test were 54.68, 38.19, and 42.39%, respectively. Correspondingly, the results under “center distance” rule were 55.43, 38.69, and 42.96%, and the results under “area overlap” rule were 40.35, 27.75, and 31.13%. Among the six types of pulmonary nodules, the AUTs showed the highest miss rate for pure ground-glass nodules, with an average of 59.32%, followed by pleural nodules and solid nodules, with an average of 49.80 and 42.21%, respectively. The algorithm testing results changed along with specific matching methods adopted in the testing process. The AUTs showed uneven performance on different types of pulmonary nodules. This centralized testing protocol supports the comparison between algorithms with similar intended use, and helps evaluate algorithm performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9768365/ /pubmed/36568775 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1071673 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Tang, Zhang, Hao, Meng and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Wang, Hao
Tang, Na
Zhang, Chao
Hao, Ye
Meng, Xiangfeng
Li, Jiage
Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title_full Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title_fullStr Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title_full_unstemmed Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title_short Practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
title_sort practice toward standardized performance testing of computer-aided detection algorithms for pulmonary nodule
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568775
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1071673
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghao practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule
AT tangna practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule
AT zhangchao practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule
AT haoye practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule
AT mengxiangfeng practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule
AT lijiage practicetowardstandardizedperformancetestingofcomputeraideddetectionalgorithmsforpulmonarynodule