Cargando…

Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to calculate the predictive value of admission laboratory values in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort analytical, observational study was performed, including patients with surgically confirmed perforated peptic ulcers over a 5-year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulder, Wikus W., Arko-Cobbah, Emmanuel, Joubert, Gina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.003
_version_ 1784854151218331648
author Mulder, Wikus W.
Arko-Cobbah, Emmanuel
Joubert, Gina
author_facet Mulder, Wikus W.
Arko-Cobbah, Emmanuel
Joubert, Gina
author_sort Mulder, Wikus W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The study aimed to calculate the predictive value of admission laboratory values in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort analytical, observational study was performed, including patients with surgically confirmed perforated peptic ulcers over a 5-year period. Demographic data and admission laboratory values were collected from hospital electronic databases. Outcomes measured were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay. The significance of categorical variables was calculated by chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine univariately statistically significant variables. RESULTS: In total, 188 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 46 (range 15–87) years with a male predominance of 71.3 % (n = 134). The median length of hospital stay was 7 (range 1–94) days and 31.4 % (n = 59) of patients were admitted to the ICU. Post-operative in-hospital mortality was 25.0 % (n = 47). Predicting the categorical outcome of in-hospital mortality, abnormal haemoglobin, platelet count, urea, creatinine and potassium levels were all found to be statistically significant in the univariate analysis. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03), haemoglobin (OR 4.36) and creatinine (OR 7.76) levels were significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate among patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease is still substantial. Admission laboratory values showed statistical significance as outcome indicators and were valuable to assist in predicting the prognosis. An abnormally high serum creatinine level was the strongest single predictor of both mortality and ICU admission. KEY MESSAGE: Initial laboratory findings of patients admitted for perforated peptic ulcer showed that an abnormally high serum creatinine level was the strongest single predictor of both mortality and ICU admission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97683702022-12-22 Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers? Mulder, Wikus W. Arko-Cobbah, Emmanuel Joubert, Gina Surg Open Sci Research Paper BACKGROUND: The study aimed to calculate the predictive value of admission laboratory values in patients with perforated peptic ulcers. METHODS: A retrospective, cohort analytical, observational study was performed, including patients with surgically confirmed perforated peptic ulcers over a 5-year period. Demographic data and admission laboratory values were collected from hospital electronic databases. Outcomes measured were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay. The significance of categorical variables was calculated by chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine univariately statistically significant variables. RESULTS: In total, 188 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 46 (range 15–87) years with a male predominance of 71.3 % (n = 134). The median length of hospital stay was 7 (range 1–94) days and 31.4 % (n = 59) of patients were admitted to the ICU. Post-operative in-hospital mortality was 25.0 % (n = 47). Predicting the categorical outcome of in-hospital mortality, abnormal haemoglobin, platelet count, urea, creatinine and potassium levels were all found to be statistically significant in the univariate analysis. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.03), haemoglobin (OR 4.36) and creatinine (OR 7.76) levels were significant in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate among patients with perforated peptic ulcer disease is still substantial. Admission laboratory values showed statistical significance as outcome indicators and were valuable to assist in predicting the prognosis. An abnormally high serum creatinine level was the strongest single predictor of both mortality and ICU admission. KEY MESSAGE: Initial laboratory findings of patients admitted for perforated peptic ulcer showed that an abnormally high serum creatinine level was the strongest single predictor of both mortality and ICU admission. Elsevier 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9768370/ /pubmed/36570627 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mulder, Wikus W.
Arko-Cobbah, Emmanuel
Joubert, Gina
Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title_full Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title_fullStr Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title_full_unstemmed Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title_short Are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
title_sort are admission laboratory values in isolation meaningful for predicting surgical outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcers?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36570627
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2022.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT mulderwikusw areadmissionlaboratoryvaluesinisolationmeaningfulforpredictingsurgicaloutcomeinpatientswithperforatedpepticulcers
AT arkocobbahemmanuel areadmissionlaboratoryvaluesinisolationmeaningfulforpredictingsurgicaloutcomeinpatientswithperforatedpepticulcers
AT joubertgina areadmissionlaboratoryvaluesinisolationmeaningfulforpredictingsurgicaloutcomeinpatientswithperforatedpepticulcers