Cargando…

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) via meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Haonan, Ma, Xiao, Sun, Chenyu, Wu, Meng, Xu, Zhiyuan, Zhou, Shuang, Yao, Nan, Liu, Suya, Qin, Xiaobing, Han, Zhengxiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.997030
_version_ 1784854164381106176
author Liu, Haonan
Ma, Xiao
Sun, Chenyu
Wu, Meng
Xu, Zhiyuan
Zhou, Shuang
Yao, Nan
Liu, Suya
Qin, Xiaobing
Han, Zhengxiang
author_facet Liu, Haonan
Ma, Xiao
Sun, Chenyu
Wu, Meng
Xu, Zhiyuan
Zhou, Shuang
Yao, Nan
Liu, Suya
Qin, Xiaobing
Han, Zhengxiang
author_sort Liu, Haonan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) via meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from January 10, 1966 to May 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the CCRT alone with CCRT plus ACT were included. The literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary endpoints were 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Complete response rate, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risk (RR) were pooled. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 2732 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 1411 patients in the CCRT group and 1321 in the CCRT plus ACT group. The HR for 3-year rates of OS and PFS of the CCRT group compared with the CCRT plus ACT group was 0.72 [95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–1.17] and 0.78 (95%CI = 0.5–1.75), respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the complete response rate (RR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.96–1.16). However, local recurrence and distant metastasis were significantly lower in the CCRT plus ACT group than in the CCRT group (RR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44 –0.91 and RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.47–0.88). Grade 3–4 acute toxicities were more frequent in the CCRT plus ACT group (RR = 1.73, 95%CI =1.19–2.52). CONCLUSION: Although associated with a decreased risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, ACT did not significantly improve the survival rate and the complete response rate with increasing grade 3–4 acute toxicities in patients with LACC. Thus, this ACT regimen cannot be recommended for patients with LACC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0089/, identifier INPLASY202290089.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97684232022-12-22 Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Liu, Haonan Ma, Xiao Sun, Chenyu Wu, Meng Xu, Zhiyuan Zhou, Shuang Yao, Nan Liu, Suya Qin, Xiaobing Han, Zhengxiang Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) via meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from January 10, 1966 to May 20, 2022. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the CCRT alone with CCRT plus ACT were included. The literature search, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. The primary endpoints were 3-year rates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Complete response rate, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. The hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risk (RR) were pooled. RESULTS: Nine studies with a total of 2732 patients were included in this meta-analysis, including 1411 patients in the CCRT group and 1321 in the CCRT plus ACT group. The HR for 3-year rates of OS and PFS of the CCRT group compared with the CCRT plus ACT group was 0.72 [95%confidence interval (CI) = 0.44–1.17] and 0.78 (95%CI = 0.5–1.75), respectively. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the complete response rate (RR = 1.06, 95%CI = 0.96–1.16). However, local recurrence and distant metastasis were significantly lower in the CCRT plus ACT group than in the CCRT group (RR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.44 –0.91 and RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.47–0.88). Grade 3–4 acute toxicities were more frequent in the CCRT plus ACT group (RR = 1.73, 95%CI =1.19–2.52). CONCLUSION: Although associated with a decreased risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis, ACT did not significantly improve the survival rate and the complete response rate with increasing grade 3–4 acute toxicities in patients with LACC. Thus, this ACT regimen cannot be recommended for patients with LACC. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-9-0089/, identifier INPLASY202290089. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9768423/ /pubmed/36568251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.997030 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Ma, Sun, Wu, Xu, Zhou, Yao, Liu, Qin and Han https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Liu, Haonan
Ma, Xiao
Sun, Chenyu
Wu, Meng
Xu, Zhiyuan
Zhou, Shuang
Yao, Nan
Liu, Suya
Qin, Xiaobing
Han, Zhengxiang
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.997030
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhaonan concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maxiao concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunchenyu concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wumeng concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuzhiyuan concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhoushuang concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaonan concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liusuya concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT qinxiaobing concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hanzhengxiang concurrentchemoradiotherapyfollowedbyadjuvantchemotherapyversusconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneinlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis