Cargando…

Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK

AIMS AND METHOD: To re-evaluate vitamin D testing and supplementation among in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) and examine any correlates with physical health conditions, including COVID-19. Records of all in-patients between January 2019 and July 2020 (n = 78) were exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudley, Bethany, Ostrowski, Marcin, Ciausu, Vlad, Ince, Chris, McKinnon, Iain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.55
_version_ 1784854182561316864
author Dudley, Bethany
Ostrowski, Marcin
Ciausu, Vlad
Ince, Chris
McKinnon, Iain
author_facet Dudley, Bethany
Ostrowski, Marcin
Ciausu, Vlad
Ince, Chris
McKinnon, Iain
author_sort Dudley, Bethany
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND METHOD: To re-evaluate vitamin D testing and supplementation among in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) and examine any correlates with physical health conditions, including COVID-19. Records of all in-patients between January 2019 and July 2020 (n = 78) were examined for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level, ward area, supplementation status, test seasonality, medication and health status. RESULTS: The mean 25(OH)D level for supplemented (800 IU/day) patients was 75 nmol/L (s.d. = 20), compared with 40 nmol/L (s.d. = 19) in the non-supplemented group (P < 0.001). Thirty-eight percent of those who were in-patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic developed symptoms, but the small sample size could not establish vitamin D levels as a predictor of outcome. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Vitamin D (800 IU/day) supplementation is effective but the adequacy of the nationally recommended dose of 400 IU/day is unclear. Links to COVID-19 merit further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97685002022-12-29 Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK Dudley, Bethany Ostrowski, Marcin Ciausu, Vlad Ince, Chris McKinnon, Iain BJPsych Bull Original Papers AIMS AND METHOD: To re-evaluate vitamin D testing and supplementation among in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) and examine any correlates with physical health conditions, including COVID-19. Records of all in-patients between January 2019 and July 2020 (n = 78) were examined for 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level, ward area, supplementation status, test seasonality, medication and health status. RESULTS: The mean 25(OH)D level for supplemented (800 IU/day) patients was 75 nmol/L (s.d. = 20), compared with 40 nmol/L (s.d. = 19) in the non-supplemented group (P < 0.001). Thirty-eight percent of those who were in-patients during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic developed symptoms, but the small sample size could not establish vitamin D levels as a predictor of outcome. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Vitamin D (800 IU/day) supplementation is effective but the adequacy of the nationally recommended dose of 400 IU/day is unclear. Links to COVID-19 merit further research. Cambridge University Press 2022-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9768500/ /pubmed/34002690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.55 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Dudley, Bethany
Ostrowski, Marcin
Ciausu, Vlad
Ince, Chris
McKinnon, Iain
Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title_full Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title_fullStr Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title_short Revisiting vitamin D status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the North of England, UK
title_sort revisiting vitamin d status and supplementation for in-patients with intellectual and developmental disability in the north of england, uk
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34002690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.55
work_keys_str_mv AT dudleybethany revisitingvitamindstatusandsupplementationforinpatientswithintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityinthenorthofenglanduk
AT ostrowskimarcin revisitingvitamindstatusandsupplementationforinpatientswithintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityinthenorthofenglanduk
AT ciausuvlad revisitingvitamindstatusandsupplementationforinpatientswithintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityinthenorthofenglanduk
AT incechris revisitingvitamindstatusandsupplementationforinpatientswithintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityinthenorthofenglanduk
AT mckinnoniain revisitingvitamindstatusandsupplementationforinpatientswithintellectualanddevelopmentaldisabilityinthenorthofenglanduk