Cargando…
Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study
BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs), such as electronic health records and prescribing systems, are transforming health care delivery around the world. The quality of information in DHTs is key to the quality and safety of care. We developed a novel clinical information quality (CLIQ) fra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41889 |
_version_ | 1784854215609286656 |
---|---|
author | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip Wark, Petra A Mastellos, Nikolaos Neves, Ana Luisa Gallagher, Joseph Majeed, Azeem Webster, Andrew Smith, Anthony Choo-Kang, Brian Leon, Catherine Edwards, Christopher O'Shea, Conor Heitz, Elizabeth Kayode, Olamide Valentine Nash, Makeba Kowalski, Martin Jiwani, Mateen O'Callaghan, Michael Edmund Zary, Nabil Henderson, Nicola Chavannes, Niels H Čivljak, Rok Olubiyi, Olubunmi Abiola Mahapatra, Piyush Panday, Rishi Nannan Oriji, Sunday O Fox, Tatiana Erlikh Faint, Victoria Car, Josip |
author_facet | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip Wark, Petra A Mastellos, Nikolaos Neves, Ana Luisa Gallagher, Joseph Majeed, Azeem Webster, Andrew Smith, Anthony Choo-Kang, Brian Leon, Catherine Edwards, Christopher O'Shea, Conor Heitz, Elizabeth Kayode, Olamide Valentine Nash, Makeba Kowalski, Martin Jiwani, Mateen O'Callaghan, Michael Edmund Zary, Nabil Henderson, Nicola Chavannes, Niels H Čivljak, Rok Olubiyi, Olubunmi Abiola Mahapatra, Piyush Panday, Rishi Nannan Oriji, Sunday O Fox, Tatiana Erlikh Faint, Victoria Car, Josip |
author_sort | Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs), such as electronic health records and prescribing systems, are transforming health care delivery around the world. The quality of information in DHTs is key to the quality and safety of care. We developed a novel clinical information quality (CLIQ) framework to assess the quality of clinical information in DHTs. OBJECTIVE: This study explored clinicians’ perspectives on the relevance, definition, and assessment of information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. METHODS: We used a systematic and iterative eDelphi approach to engage clinicians who had information governance roles or personal interest in information governance; the clinicians were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected using semistructured online questionnaires until consensus was reached on the information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. Responses on the relevance of the dimensions were summarized to inform decisions on retention of the dimensions according to prespecified rules. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was used to revise definitions and the assessment of dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five clinicians from 10 countries participated in the study, which was concluded after the second round. Consensus was reached on all dimensions and categories in the CLIQ framework: informativeness (accuracy, completeness, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, and relevance), availability (accessibility, portability, security, and timeliness), and usability (conformance, consistency, and maintainability). A new dimension, searchability, was introduced in the availability category to account for the ease of finding needed information in the DHTs. Certain dimensions were renamed, and some definitions were rephrased to improve clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The CLIQ framework reached a high expert consensus and clarity of language relating to the information quality dimensions. The framework can be used by health care managers and institutions as a pragmatic tool for identifying and forestalling information quality problems that could compromise patient safety and quality of care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9768639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97686392022-12-22 Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip Wark, Petra A Mastellos, Nikolaos Neves, Ana Luisa Gallagher, Joseph Majeed, Azeem Webster, Andrew Smith, Anthony Choo-Kang, Brian Leon, Catherine Edwards, Christopher O'Shea, Conor Heitz, Elizabeth Kayode, Olamide Valentine Nash, Makeba Kowalski, Martin Jiwani, Mateen O'Callaghan, Michael Edmund Zary, Nabil Henderson, Nicola Chavannes, Niels H Čivljak, Rok Olubiyi, Olubunmi Abiola Mahapatra, Piyush Panday, Rishi Nannan Oriji, Sunday O Fox, Tatiana Erlikh Faint, Victoria Car, Josip J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Digital health technologies (DHTs), such as electronic health records and prescribing systems, are transforming health care delivery around the world. The quality of information in DHTs is key to the quality and safety of care. We developed a novel clinical information quality (CLIQ) framework to assess the quality of clinical information in DHTs. OBJECTIVE: This study explored clinicians’ perspectives on the relevance, definition, and assessment of information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. METHODS: We used a systematic and iterative eDelphi approach to engage clinicians who had information governance roles or personal interest in information governance; the clinicians were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. Data were collected using semistructured online questionnaires until consensus was reached on the information quality dimensions in the CLIQ framework. Responses on the relevance of the dimensions were summarized to inform decisions on retention of the dimensions according to prespecified rules. Thematic analysis of the free-text responses was used to revise definitions and the assessment of dimensions. RESULTS: Thirty-five clinicians from 10 countries participated in the study, which was concluded after the second round. Consensus was reached on all dimensions and categories in the CLIQ framework: informativeness (accuracy, completeness, interpretability, plausibility, provenance, and relevance), availability (accessibility, portability, security, and timeliness), and usability (conformance, consistency, and maintainability). A new dimension, searchability, was introduced in the availability category to account for the ease of finding needed information in the DHTs. Certain dimensions were renamed, and some definitions were rephrased to improve clarity. CONCLUSIONS: The CLIQ framework reached a high expert consensus and clarity of language relating to the information quality dimensions. The framework can be used by health care managers and institutions as a pragmatic tool for identifying and forestalling information quality problems that could compromise patient safety and quality of care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057430 JMIR Publications 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9768639/ /pubmed/36472901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41889 Text en ©Kayode Philip Fadahunsi, Petra A Wark, Nikolaos Mastellos, Ana Luisa Neves, Joseph Gallagher, Azeem Majeed, Andrew Webster, Anthony Smith, Brian Choo-Kang, Catherine Leon, Christopher Edwards, Conor O'Shea, Elizabeth Heitz, Olamide Valentine Kayode, Makeba Nash, Martin Kowalski, Mateen Jiwani, Michael Edmund O'Callaghan, Nabil Zary, Nicola Henderson, Niels H Chavannes, Rok Čivljak, Olubunmi Abiola Olubiyi, Piyush Mahapatra, Rishi Nannan Panday, Sunday O Oriji, Tatiana Erlikh Fox, Victoria Faint, Josip Car. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.12.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip Wark, Petra A Mastellos, Nikolaos Neves, Ana Luisa Gallagher, Joseph Majeed, Azeem Webster, Andrew Smith, Anthony Choo-Kang, Brian Leon, Catherine Edwards, Christopher O'Shea, Conor Heitz, Elizabeth Kayode, Olamide Valentine Nash, Makeba Kowalski, Martin Jiwani, Mateen O'Callaghan, Michael Edmund Zary, Nabil Henderson, Nicola Chavannes, Niels H Čivljak, Rok Olubiyi, Olubunmi Abiola Mahapatra, Piyush Panday, Rishi Nannan Oriji, Sunday O Fox, Tatiana Erlikh Faint, Victoria Car, Josip Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title | Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title_full | Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title_short | Assessment of Clinical Information Quality in Digital Health Technologies: International eDelphi Study |
title_sort | assessment of clinical information quality in digital health technologies: international edelphi study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36472901 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/41889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fadahunsikayodephilip assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT warkpetraa assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT mastellosnikolaos assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT nevesanaluisa assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT gallagherjoseph assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT majeedazeem assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT websterandrew assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT smithanthony assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT chookangbrian assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT leoncatherine assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT edwardschristopher assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT osheaconor assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT heitzelizabeth assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT kayodeolamidevalentine assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT nashmakeba assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT kowalskimartin assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT jiwanimateen assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT ocallaghanmichaeledmund assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT zarynabil assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT hendersonnicola assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT chavannesnielsh assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT civljakrok assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT olubiyiolubunmiabiola assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT mahapatrapiyush assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT pandayrishinannan assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT orijisundayo assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT foxtatianaerlikh assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT faintvictoria assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy AT carjosip assessmentofclinicalinformationqualityindigitalhealthtechnologiesinternationaledelphistudy |