Cargando…
Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007 |
_version_ | 1784854269479878656 |
---|---|
author | Chawla, Daniel G. Cappuccio, Antonio Tamminga, Andrea Sealfon, Stuart C. Zaslavsky, Elena Kleinstein, Steven H. |
author_facet | Chawla, Daniel G. Cappuccio, Antonio Tamminga, Andrea Sealfon, Stuart C. Zaslavsky, Elena Kleinstein, Steven H. |
author_sort | Chawla, Daniel G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease signatures, we developed a framework that includes a compendium of 17,105 transcriptional profiles capturing infectious and non-infectious conditions and a standardized methodology to assess robustness and cross-reactivity. Applied to 30 published signatures of infection, the analysis showed that signatures were generally robust in detecting viral and bacterial infections in independent data. Asymptomatic and chronic infections were also detectable, albeit with decreased performance. However, many signatures were cross-reactive with unintended infections and aging. In general, we found robustness and cross-reactivity to be conflicting objectives, and we identified signature properties associated with this trade-off. The data compendium and evaluation framework developed here provide a foundation for the development of signatures for clinical application. A record of this paper’s transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9768893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97688932022-12-21 Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis Chawla, Daniel G. Cappuccio, Antonio Tamminga, Andrea Sealfon, Stuart C. Zaslavsky, Elena Kleinstein, Steven H. Cell Syst Article Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease signatures, we developed a framework that includes a compendium of 17,105 transcriptional profiles capturing infectious and non-infectious conditions and a standardized methodology to assess robustness and cross-reactivity. Applied to 30 published signatures of infection, the analysis showed that signatures were generally robust in detecting viral and bacterial infections in independent data. Asymptomatic and chronic infections were also detectable, albeit with decreased performance. However, many signatures were cross-reactive with unintended infections and aging. In general, we found robustness and cross-reactivity to be conflicting objectives, and we identified signature properties associated with this trade-off. The data compendium and evaluation framework developed here provide a foundation for the development of signatures for clinical application. A record of this paper’s transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information. Elsevier Inc. 2022-12-21 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9768893/ /pubmed/36549274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Chawla, Daniel G. Cappuccio, Antonio Tamminga, Andrea Sealfon, Stuart C. Zaslavsky, Elena Kleinstein, Steven H. Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title | Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title_full | Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title_short | Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
title_sort | benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chawladanielg benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis AT cappuccioantonio benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis AT tammingaandrea benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis AT sealfonstuartc benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis AT zaslavskyelena benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis AT kleinsteinstevenh benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis |