Cargando…

Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis

Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chawla, Daniel G., Cappuccio, Antonio, Tamminga, Andrea, Sealfon, Stuart C., Zaslavsky, Elena, Kleinstein, Steven H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007
_version_ 1784854269479878656
author Chawla, Daniel G.
Cappuccio, Antonio
Tamminga, Andrea
Sealfon, Stuart C.
Zaslavsky, Elena
Kleinstein, Steven H.
author_facet Chawla, Daniel G.
Cappuccio, Antonio
Tamminga, Andrea
Sealfon, Stuart C.
Zaslavsky, Elena
Kleinstein, Steven H.
author_sort Chawla, Daniel G.
collection PubMed
description Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease signatures, we developed a framework that includes a compendium of 17,105 transcriptional profiles capturing infectious and non-infectious conditions and a standardized methodology to assess robustness and cross-reactivity. Applied to 30 published signatures of infection, the analysis showed that signatures were generally robust in detecting viral and bacterial infections in independent data. Asymptomatic and chronic infections were also detectable, albeit with decreased performance. However, many signatures were cross-reactive with unintended infections and aging. In general, we found robustness and cross-reactivity to be conflicting objectives, and we identified signature properties associated with this trade-off. The data compendium and evaluation framework developed here provide a foundation for the development of signatures for clinical application. A record of this paper’s transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97688932022-12-21 Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis Chawla, Daniel G. Cappuccio, Antonio Tamminga, Andrea Sealfon, Stuart C. Zaslavsky, Elena Kleinstein, Steven H. Cell Syst Article Identification of host transcriptional response signatures has emerged as a new paradigm for infection diagnosis. For clinical applications, signatures must robustly detect the pathogen of interest without cross-reacting with unintended conditions. To evaluate the performance of infectious disease signatures, we developed a framework that includes a compendium of 17,105 transcriptional profiles capturing infectious and non-infectious conditions and a standardized methodology to assess robustness and cross-reactivity. Applied to 30 published signatures of infection, the analysis showed that signatures were generally robust in detecting viral and bacterial infections in independent data. Asymptomatic and chronic infections were also detectable, albeit with decreased performance. However, many signatures were cross-reactive with unintended infections and aging. In general, we found robustness and cross-reactivity to be conflicting objectives, and we identified signature properties associated with this trade-off. The data compendium and evaluation framework developed here provide a foundation for the development of signatures for clinical application. A record of this paper’s transparent peer review process is included in the supplemental information. Elsevier Inc. 2022-12-21 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9768893/ /pubmed/36549274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Chawla, Daniel G.
Cappuccio, Antonio
Tamminga, Andrea
Sealfon, Stuart C.
Zaslavsky, Elena
Kleinstein, Steven H.
Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title_full Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title_fullStr Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title_short Benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
title_sort benchmarking transcriptional host response signatures for infection diagnosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2022.11.007
work_keys_str_mv AT chawladanielg benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis
AT cappuccioantonio benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis
AT tammingaandrea benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis
AT sealfonstuartc benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis
AT zaslavskyelena benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis
AT kleinsteinstevenh benchmarkingtranscriptionalhostresponsesignaturesforinfectiondiagnosis