Cargando…

Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although regulatory changes towards correcting the underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) occurred (National Institutes of Health 1994), concerns exist about whether an improvement is taking place. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daitch, Vered, Turjeman, Adi, Poran, Itamar, Tau, Noam, Ayalon-Dangur, Irit, Nashashibi, Jeries, Yahav, Dafna, Paul, Mical, Leibovici, Leonard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2
_version_ 1784854288231563264
author Daitch, Vered
Turjeman, Adi
Poran, Itamar
Tau, Noam
Ayalon-Dangur, Irit
Nashashibi, Jeries
Yahav, Dafna
Paul, Mical
Leibovici, Leonard
author_facet Daitch, Vered
Turjeman, Adi
Poran, Itamar
Tau, Noam
Ayalon-Dangur, Irit
Nashashibi, Jeries
Yahav, Dafna
Paul, Mical
Leibovici, Leonard
author_sort Daitch, Vered
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although regulatory changes towards correcting the underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) occurred (National Institutes of Health 1994), concerns exist about whether an improvement is taking place. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the inclusion rates of women in recent RCTs and to explore the potential barriers for the enrollment of women. METHODS: RCTs published in 2017 examining any type of intervention in adults were searched in PubMed and Cochrane Library. The following predefined medical fields were included: cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms, endocrine system diseases, respiratory tract diseases, bacterial and fungal infections, viral diseases, digestive system diseases, and immune system diseases. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and an equal number of studies was randomly selected per calendric month. The primary outcome was the enrollment rate of women, calculated as the number of randomized women patients divided by the total number of randomized patients. Rates were weighted by their inverse variance; statistical significance was tested using general linear models (GLM). RESULTS: Out of 398 RCTs assessed for eligibility, 300 RCTs were included. The enrollment rate of women in all the examined fields was lower than 50%, except for immune system diseases [median enrollment rate of 68% (IQR 46 to 81)]. The overall median enrollment rate of women was 41% (IQR 27 to 54). The median enrollment rate of women decreased with older age of the trials’ participants [mean age of trials’ participants ≤ 45 years: 47% (IQR 30–64), 46–55 years: 46% (IQR 33–58), 56–62 years: 38% (IQR 27–50), ≥ 63 years: 33% (IQR 20–46), p < 0.001]. Methodological quality characteristics showed no significant association with the enrollment rates of women. Out of the 300 included RCTs, eleven did not report on the number of included women. There was no significant difference between these studies and the studies included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Women are being inadequately represented, in the selected medical fields analyzed in our study, in recent RCTs. Older age is a potential barrier for the enrollment of women in clinical trials. Low inclusion rates of elderly women might create a lack of crucial knowledge in the adverse effects and the benefit/risk profile of any given treatment. Factors that might hinder the participation of women should be sought and addressed in the design of the study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9768985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97689852022-12-22 Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis Daitch, Vered Turjeman, Adi Poran, Itamar Tau, Noam Ayalon-Dangur, Irit Nashashibi, Jeries Yahav, Dafna Paul, Mical Leibovici, Leonard Trials Research BACKGROUND: Although regulatory changes towards correcting the underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) occurred (National Institutes of Health 1994), concerns exist about whether an improvement is taking place. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the inclusion rates of women in recent RCTs and to explore the potential barriers for the enrollment of women. METHODS: RCTs published in 2017 examining any type of intervention in adults were searched in PubMed and Cochrane Library. The following predefined medical fields were included: cardiovascular diseases, neoplasms, endocrine system diseases, respiratory tract diseases, bacterial and fungal infections, viral diseases, digestive system diseases, and immune system diseases. Studies were screened independently by two reviewers, and an equal number of studies was randomly selected per calendric month. The primary outcome was the enrollment rate of women, calculated as the number of randomized women patients divided by the total number of randomized patients. Rates were weighted by their inverse variance; statistical significance was tested using general linear models (GLM). RESULTS: Out of 398 RCTs assessed for eligibility, 300 RCTs were included. The enrollment rate of women in all the examined fields was lower than 50%, except for immune system diseases [median enrollment rate of 68% (IQR 46 to 81)]. The overall median enrollment rate of women was 41% (IQR 27 to 54). The median enrollment rate of women decreased with older age of the trials’ participants [mean age of trials’ participants ≤ 45 years: 47% (IQR 30–64), 46–55 years: 46% (IQR 33–58), 56–62 years: 38% (IQR 27–50), ≥ 63 years: 33% (IQR 20–46), p < 0.001]. Methodological quality characteristics showed no significant association with the enrollment rates of women. Out of the 300 included RCTs, eleven did not report on the number of included women. There was no significant difference between these studies and the studies included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Women are being inadequately represented, in the selected medical fields analyzed in our study, in recent RCTs. Older age is a potential barrier for the enrollment of women in clinical trials. Low inclusion rates of elderly women might create a lack of crucial knowledge in the adverse effects and the benefit/risk profile of any given treatment. Factors that might hinder the participation of women should be sought and addressed in the design of the study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2. BioMed Central 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9768985/ /pubmed/36539814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Daitch, Vered
Turjeman, Adi
Poran, Itamar
Tau, Noam
Ayalon-Dangur, Irit
Nashashibi, Jeries
Yahav, Dafna
Paul, Mical
Leibovici, Leonard
Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort underrepresentation of women in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9768985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36539814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07004-2
work_keys_str_mv AT daitchvered underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT turjemanadi underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT poranitamar underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taunoam underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ayalondanguririt underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nashashibijeries underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yahavdafna underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT paulmical underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leibovicileonard underrepresentationofwomeninrandomizedcontrolledtrialsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis