Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies

Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetrac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Meixiao, Fan, Yuxin, Chen, Jingjing, Yang, Jiaru, Gao, Li, Wu, Xinya, Xu, Xin, Zhang, Yu, Yue, Peng, Cao, Wenjing, Ji, Zhenhua, Su, Xuan, Wen, Shiyuan, Kong, Jing, Zhou, Guozhong, Li, Bingxue, Dong, Yan, Liu, Aihua, Bao, Fukai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36377935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22
_version_ 1784854413957922816
author Liu, Meixiao
Fan, Yuxin
Chen, Jingjing
Yang, Jiaru
Gao, Li
Wu, Xinya
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Yu
Yue, Peng
Cao, Wenjing
Ji, Zhenhua
Su, Xuan
Wen, Shiyuan
Kong, Jing
Zhou, Guozhong
Li, Bingxue
Dong, Yan
Liu, Aihua
Bao, Fukai
author_facet Liu, Meixiao
Fan, Yuxin
Chen, Jingjing
Yang, Jiaru
Gao, Li
Wu, Xinya
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Yu
Yue, Peng
Cao, Wenjing
Ji, Zhenhua
Su, Xuan
Wen, Shiyuan
Kong, Jing
Zhou, Guozhong
Li, Bingxue
Dong, Yan
Liu, Aihua
Bao, Fukai
author_sort Liu, Meixiao
collection PubMed
description Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline for syphilis treatment, compared with penicillin, to determine which antibiotic could be a better substitute for penicillin. This study included 17 articles, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 observational studies and involving 4,485 syphilis patients. Estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to compare the serological response rates. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the serological response rates were compared by direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Based on direct meta-analysis, the serological response rates at the 3- and 24-month follow-ups were compared. Our NMA showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up (RR of 1.12, 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.23). Ceftriaxone was equally effective as penicillin for syphilis in terms of serological response rates, and it was a better substitute for penicillin than ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, or doxycycline. However, more large-scale, high-quality, double-blind trials are still needed to determine whether ceftriaxone can safely replace penicillin for the treatment of syphilis when necessary. IMPORTANCE Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for syphilis treatment. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present emerging threatening problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. Our results showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up. Sufficient data are not available for demonstrating significant differences in the efficacy of the other four antibiotics (erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline) for treating syphilis. In the clinical treatment of syphilis in patients who are allergic to penicillin or for whom penicillin is not available, ceftriaxone appears to be a better alternative treatment. This meta-analysis provides a reference for clinical treatment of syphilis. Currently, a lack of sufficient evidence to guide antibiotic treatment of syphilis exists, and a need for more high-quality RCTs is still present. This network meta-analysis can lay a foundation for further research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9769634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97696342022-12-22 Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies Liu, Meixiao Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Yang, Jiaru Gao, Li Wu, Xinya Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Cao, Wenjing Ji, Zhenhua Su, Xuan Wen, Shiyuan Kong, Jing Zhou, Guozhong Li, Bingxue Dong, Yan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai Microbiol Spectr Research Article Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline for syphilis treatment, compared with penicillin, to determine which antibiotic could be a better substitute for penicillin. This study included 17 articles, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 observational studies and involving 4,485 syphilis patients. Estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to compare the serological response rates. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the serological response rates were compared by direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Based on direct meta-analysis, the serological response rates at the 3- and 24-month follow-ups were compared. Our NMA showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up (RR of 1.12, 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.23). Ceftriaxone was equally effective as penicillin for syphilis in terms of serological response rates, and it was a better substitute for penicillin than ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, or doxycycline. However, more large-scale, high-quality, double-blind trials are still needed to determine whether ceftriaxone can safely replace penicillin for the treatment of syphilis when necessary. IMPORTANCE Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for syphilis treatment. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present emerging threatening problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. Our results showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up. Sufficient data are not available for demonstrating significant differences in the efficacy of the other four antibiotics (erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline) for treating syphilis. In the clinical treatment of syphilis in patients who are allergic to penicillin or for whom penicillin is not available, ceftriaxone appears to be a better alternative treatment. This meta-analysis provides a reference for clinical treatment of syphilis. Currently, a lack of sufficient evidence to guide antibiotic treatment of syphilis exists, and a need for more high-quality RCTs is still present. This network meta-analysis can lay a foundation for further research. American Society for Microbiology 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9769634/ /pubmed/36377935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Meixiao
Fan, Yuxin
Chen, Jingjing
Yang, Jiaru
Gao, Li
Wu, Xinya
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Yu
Yue, Peng
Cao, Wenjing
Ji, Zhenhua
Su, Xuan
Wen, Shiyuan
Kong, Jing
Zhou, Guozhong
Li, Bingxue
Dong, Yan
Liu, Aihua
Bao, Fukai
Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
title_sort efficacy and safety of treatments for different stages of syphilis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36377935
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22
work_keys_str_mv AT liumeixiao efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT fanyuxin efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT chenjingjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT yangjiaru efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT gaoli efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT wuxinya efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT xuxin efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT zhangyu efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT yuepeng efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT caowenjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT jizhenhua efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT suxuan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT wenshiyuan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT kongjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT zhouguozhong efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT libingxue efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT dongyan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT liuaihua efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies
AT baofukai efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies