Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies
Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetrac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36377935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22 |
_version_ | 1784854413957922816 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Meixiao Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Yang, Jiaru Gao, Li Wu, Xinya Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Cao, Wenjing Ji, Zhenhua Su, Xuan Wen, Shiyuan Kong, Jing Zhou, Guozhong Li, Bingxue Dong, Yan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai |
author_facet | Liu, Meixiao Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Yang, Jiaru Gao, Li Wu, Xinya Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Cao, Wenjing Ji, Zhenhua Su, Xuan Wen, Shiyuan Kong, Jing Zhou, Guozhong Li, Bingxue Dong, Yan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai |
author_sort | Liu, Meixiao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline for syphilis treatment, compared with penicillin, to determine which antibiotic could be a better substitute for penicillin. This study included 17 articles, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 observational studies and involving 4,485 syphilis patients. Estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to compare the serological response rates. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the serological response rates were compared by direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Based on direct meta-analysis, the serological response rates at the 3- and 24-month follow-ups were compared. Our NMA showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up (RR of 1.12, 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.23). Ceftriaxone was equally effective as penicillin for syphilis in terms of serological response rates, and it was a better substitute for penicillin than ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, or doxycycline. However, more large-scale, high-quality, double-blind trials are still needed to determine whether ceftriaxone can safely replace penicillin for the treatment of syphilis when necessary. IMPORTANCE Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for syphilis treatment. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present emerging threatening problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. Our results showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up. Sufficient data are not available for demonstrating significant differences in the efficacy of the other four antibiotics (erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline) for treating syphilis. In the clinical treatment of syphilis in patients who are allergic to penicillin or for whom penicillin is not available, ceftriaxone appears to be a better alternative treatment. This meta-analysis provides a reference for clinical treatment of syphilis. Currently, a lack of sufficient evidence to guide antibiotic treatment of syphilis exists, and a need for more high-quality RCTs is still present. This network meta-analysis can lay a foundation for further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9769634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97696342022-12-22 Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies Liu, Meixiao Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Yang, Jiaru Gao, Li Wu, Xinya Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Cao, Wenjing Ji, Zhenhua Su, Xuan Wen, Shiyuan Kong, Jing Zhou, Guozhong Li, Bingxue Dong, Yan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai Microbiol Spectr Research Article Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for treating syphilis. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present challenging problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline for syphilis treatment, compared with penicillin, to determine which antibiotic could be a better substitute for penicillin. This study included 17 articles, comprising 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 14 observational studies and involving 4,485 syphilis patients. Estimated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used to compare the serological response rates. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the serological response rates were compared by direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Based on direct meta-analysis, the serological response rates at the 3- and 24-month follow-ups were compared. Our NMA showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up (RR of 1.12, 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.23). Ceftriaxone was equally effective as penicillin for syphilis in terms of serological response rates, and it was a better substitute for penicillin than ceftriaxone, erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, or doxycycline. However, more large-scale, high-quality, double-blind trials are still needed to determine whether ceftriaxone can safely replace penicillin for the treatment of syphilis when necessary. IMPORTANCE Parenteral penicillin is the first-line regimen for syphilis treatment. However, allergic reactions and poor drug tolerance still present emerging threatening problems with respect to use of this antibiotic. Our results showed a higher serological response rate for ceftriaxone than for penicillin at the 6-month follow-up. Sufficient data are not available for demonstrating significant differences in the efficacy of the other four antibiotics (erythromycin, minocycline, tetracycline, and doxycycline) for treating syphilis. In the clinical treatment of syphilis in patients who are allergic to penicillin or for whom penicillin is not available, ceftriaxone appears to be a better alternative treatment. This meta-analysis provides a reference for clinical treatment of syphilis. Currently, a lack of sufficient evidence to guide antibiotic treatment of syphilis exists, and a need for more high-quality RCTs is still present. This network meta-analysis can lay a foundation for further research. American Society for Microbiology 2022-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9769634/ /pubmed/36377935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Meixiao Fan, Yuxin Chen, Jingjing Yang, Jiaru Gao, Li Wu, Xinya Xu, Xin Zhang, Yu Yue, Peng Cao, Wenjing Ji, Zhenhua Su, Xuan Wen, Shiyuan Kong, Jing Zhou, Guozhong Li, Bingxue Dong, Yan Liu, Aihua Bao, Fukai Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Treatments for Different Stages of Syphilis: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of treatments for different stages of syphilis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36377935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02977-22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liumeixiao efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT fanyuxin efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT chenjingjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT yangjiaru efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT gaoli efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT wuxinya efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT xuxin efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT zhangyu efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT yuepeng efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT caowenjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT jizhenhua efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT suxuan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT wenshiyuan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT kongjing efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT zhouguozhong efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT libingxue efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT dongyan efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT liuaihua efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies AT baofukai efficacyandsafetyoftreatmentsfordifferentstagesofsyphilisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandobservationalstudies |