Cargando…

Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019

To evaluate the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Li, Yang, Yang, Zheng, Changhe, Sun, Gang, Han, Renru, Guo, Yan, Yin, Dandan, Wu, Shi, Zhu, Demei, Hu, Fupin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01715-22
_version_ 1784854421093482496
author Ding, Li
Yang, Yang
Zheng, Changhe
Sun, Gang
Han, Renru
Guo, Yan
Yin, Dandan
Wu, Shi
Zhu, Demei
Hu, Fupin
author_facet Ding, Li
Yang, Yang
Zheng, Changhe
Sun, Gang
Han, Renru
Guo, Yan
Yin, Dandan
Wu, Shi
Zhu, Demei
Hu, Fupin
author_sort Ding, Li
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Eravacycline was highly active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates, proved by the MIC(50/90): 0.06/0.125, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.125/0.5, 0.125/0.25, and 0.03/0.06 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively. S. aureus isolates tested were fully susceptible to tedizolid. Still, nonsusceptible isolates were found for E. faecalis (72/567 [12.7%]) and E. faecium (12/501 [2.4%]). Norvancomycin at 2 mg/L could inhibit 100% of Staphylococcus spp., while 1 mg/L of ceftaroline could inhibit 78.9% of MRSA and 99.9% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Additionally, nemonoxacin was also active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates tested (shown by the following MIC(90)s and ranges, in milligrams per liter: 2 and ≤0.015 to 8 for MRSA, 0.25 and ≤0.015 to 4 for MSSA, 0.5 and ≤0.015 to 8 for S. epidermidis, and 4 and ≤0.015 to >32 for E. faecalis). In conclusion, both eravacycline and tedizolid were highly active against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. recently collected across China. Nemonoxacin showed potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. and E. faecalis but limited activity against E. faecium. Norvancomycin and ceftaroline displayed highly potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance has become a severe threat to global public health. According to statistics, nearly 700,000 people die from bacterial infections worldwide (J. O’Neill, Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations, 2014; C. Y. Chin, K. A. Tipton, M. Farokhyfar, E. M. Burd, et al., Nat Microbiol 3:563–569, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0151-5). The number of bacterial infections is expected to climb to 10 million by 2050, showing that bacterial resistance has become a significant problem that cannot be ignored. It is crucial to develop new antimicrobial agents to combat antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus species isolates which were collected as part of CHINET in 2019. We believe that this study can provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9769667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97696672022-12-22 Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019 Ding, Li Yang, Yang Zheng, Changhe Sun, Gang Han, Renru Guo, Yan Yin, Dandan Wu, Shi Zhu, Demei Hu, Fupin Microbiol Spectr Research Article To evaluate the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates were collected as part of the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2019 to provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the CLSI broth microdilution reference method. Eravacycline was highly active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates, proved by the MIC(50/90): 0.06/0.125, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.06/0.25, 0.125/0.5, 0.125/0.25, and 0.03/0.06 mg/L for Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), S. epidermidis, S. hominis, S. haemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, and E. faecium, respectively. S. aureus isolates tested were fully susceptible to tedizolid. Still, nonsusceptible isolates were found for E. faecalis (72/567 [12.7%]) and E. faecium (12/501 [2.4%]). Norvancomycin at 2 mg/L could inhibit 100% of Staphylococcus spp., while 1 mg/L of ceftaroline could inhibit 78.9% of MRSA and 99.9% of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates. Additionally, nemonoxacin was also active against Staphylococcus and Enterococcus species isolates tested (shown by the following MIC(90)s and ranges, in milligrams per liter: 2 and ≤0.015 to 8 for MRSA, 0.25 and ≤0.015 to 4 for MSSA, 0.5 and ≤0.015 to 8 for S. epidermidis, and 4 and ≤0.015 to >32 for E. faecalis). In conclusion, both eravacycline and tedizolid were highly active against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. recently collected across China. Nemonoxacin showed potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. and E. faecalis but limited activity against E. faecium. Norvancomycin and ceftaroline displayed highly potent activity against Staphylococcus spp. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance has become a severe threat to global public health. According to statistics, nearly 700,000 people die from bacterial infections worldwide (J. O’Neill, Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a Crisis for the Health and Wealth of Nations, 2014; C. Y. Chin, K. A. Tipton, M. Farokhyfar, E. M. Burd, et al., Nat Microbiol 3:563–569, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0151-5). The number of bacterial infections is expected to climb to 10 million by 2050, showing that bacterial resistance has become a significant problem that cannot be ignored. It is crucial to develop new antimicrobial agents to combat antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, nemonoxacin, norvancomycin, and ceftaroline against Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus species isolates which were collected as part of CHINET in 2019. We believe that this study can provide susceptibility data for Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. for their future development and application in clinical practice. American Society for Microbiology 2022-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9769667/ /pubmed/36326536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01715-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ding et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Ding, Li
Yang, Yang
Zheng, Changhe
Sun, Gang
Han, Renru
Guo, Yan
Yin, Dandan
Wu, Shi
Zhu, Demei
Hu, Fupin
Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title_full Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title_fullStr Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title_full_unstemmed Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title_short Activities of Eravacycline, Tedizolid, Norvancomycin, Nemonoxacin, Ceftaroline, and Comparators against 1,871 Staphylococcus and 1,068 Enterococcus Species Isolates from China: Updated Report of the CHINET Study 2019
title_sort activities of eravacycline, tedizolid, norvancomycin, nemonoxacin, ceftaroline, and comparators against 1,871 staphylococcus and 1,068 enterococcus species isolates from china: updated report of the chinet study 2019
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36326536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01715-22
work_keys_str_mv AT dingli activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT yangyang activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT zhengchanghe activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT sungang activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT hanrenru activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT guoyan activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT yindandan activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT wushi activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT zhudemei activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019
AT hufupin activitiesoferavacyclinetedizolidnorvancomycinnemonoxacinceftarolineandcomparatorsagainst1871staphylococcusand1068enterococcusspeciesisolatesfromchinaupdatedreportofthechinetstudy2019