Cargando…

Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples

The Omicron variant differs from earlier strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the way it enters host cells and grows in vitro. We therefore reevaluated its diagnosis using saliva, nasopharyngeal swab (NPs), and anterior nasal swab (ANs) specimens from 202 individuals (64.9% symptomatic) tested at the Toulouse U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Migueres, Marion, Mansuy, Jean-Michel, Vasseur, Sandrine, Claverie, Nicolas, Lougarre, Catherine, Soulier, Françoise, Trémeaux, Pauline, Izopet, Jacques
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02521-22
_version_ 1784854450940149760
author Migueres, Marion
Mansuy, Jean-Michel
Vasseur, Sandrine
Claverie, Nicolas
Lougarre, Catherine
Soulier, Françoise
Trémeaux, Pauline
Izopet, Jacques
author_facet Migueres, Marion
Mansuy, Jean-Michel
Vasseur, Sandrine
Claverie, Nicolas
Lougarre, Catherine
Soulier, Françoise
Trémeaux, Pauline
Izopet, Jacques
author_sort Migueres, Marion
collection PubMed
description The Omicron variant differs from earlier strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the way it enters host cells and grows in vitro. We therefore reevaluated its diagnosis using saliva, nasopharyngeal swab (NPs), and anterior nasal swab (ANs) specimens from 202 individuals (64.9% symptomatic) tested at the Toulouse University Hospital SARS-CoV-2 drive-through testing center. All tests were done with the Thermo Fisher TaqPath COVID-19 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) kit. Overall, 92 subjects (45.5%) had one or more positive specimens. Global sensitivities of saliva, NPs, and ANs were 94.6%, 90.2%, and 82.6%, respectively. Saliva provided significantly greater sensitivity among symptomatic patients tested within 5 days of symptom onset (100%) than did ANs (83.1%) or NPs (89.8%). We obtained follow-up samples for 7/20 individuals with discordant results. Among them, 5 symptomatic patients were diagnosed positive on saliva sample only, soon after symptom onset; NPs and ANs became positive only later. Thus, saliva samples are effective tools for the detection of the Omicron variant. In addition to its many advantages, such as improved patient acceptance and reduced cost, saliva sampling could help limit viral spread through earlier viral detection. IMPORTANCE Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 is an essential component of the global strategy for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous studies have evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity of different respiratory and oral specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The pandemic has been since dominated by the emergence of new variants, the latest being the Omicron variant characterized by numerous mutations and changes in host tropism in vitro that might affect the diagnostic performance of tests depending on the sampling location. In this prospective study, we evaluated the clinical performance of NPs, ANs, and saliva for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis during the Omicron wave. Our results highlight the effectiveness of saliva-based RT-PCR for the early detection of the Omicron variant. These findings may help to refine guidelines and support the use of a highly sensitive diagnostic method that allows earlier diagnosis, when transmission is the most critical.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9769796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97697962022-12-22 Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples Migueres, Marion Mansuy, Jean-Michel Vasseur, Sandrine Claverie, Nicolas Lougarre, Catherine Soulier, Françoise Trémeaux, Pauline Izopet, Jacques Microbiol Spectr Research Article The Omicron variant differs from earlier strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the way it enters host cells and grows in vitro. We therefore reevaluated its diagnosis using saliva, nasopharyngeal swab (NPs), and anterior nasal swab (ANs) specimens from 202 individuals (64.9% symptomatic) tested at the Toulouse University Hospital SARS-CoV-2 drive-through testing center. All tests were done with the Thermo Fisher TaqPath COVID-19 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) kit. Overall, 92 subjects (45.5%) had one or more positive specimens. Global sensitivities of saliva, NPs, and ANs were 94.6%, 90.2%, and 82.6%, respectively. Saliva provided significantly greater sensitivity among symptomatic patients tested within 5 days of symptom onset (100%) than did ANs (83.1%) or NPs (89.8%). We obtained follow-up samples for 7/20 individuals with discordant results. Among them, 5 symptomatic patients were diagnosed positive on saliva sample only, soon after symptom onset; NPs and ANs became positive only later. Thus, saliva samples are effective tools for the detection of the Omicron variant. In addition to its many advantages, such as improved patient acceptance and reduced cost, saliva sampling could help limit viral spread through earlier viral detection. IMPORTANCE Diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 is an essential component of the global strategy for the prevention and control of COVID-19. Since the beginning of the pandemic, numerous studies have evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity of different respiratory and oral specimens for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The pandemic has been since dominated by the emergence of new variants, the latest being the Omicron variant characterized by numerous mutations and changes in host tropism in vitro that might affect the diagnostic performance of tests depending on the sampling location. In this prospective study, we evaluated the clinical performance of NPs, ANs, and saliva for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis during the Omicron wave. Our results highlight the effectiveness of saliva-based RT-PCR for the early detection of the Omicron variant. These findings may help to refine guidelines and support the use of a highly sensitive diagnostic method that allows earlier diagnosis, when transmission is the most critical. American Society for Microbiology 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9769796/ /pubmed/36318040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02521-22 Text en Copyright © 2022 Migueres et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Migueres, Marion
Mansuy, Jean-Michel
Vasseur, Sandrine
Claverie, Nicolas
Lougarre, Catherine
Soulier, Françoise
Trémeaux, Pauline
Izopet, Jacques
Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title_full Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title_fullStr Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title_full_unstemmed Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title_short Omicron Wave SARS-CoV-2 Diagnosis: Evaluation of Saliva, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swab Samples
title_sort omicron wave sars-cov-2 diagnosis: evaluation of saliva, anterior nasal, and nasopharyngeal swab samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02521-22
work_keys_str_mv AT migueresmarion omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT mansuyjeanmichel omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT vasseursandrine omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT claverienicolas omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT lougarrecatherine omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT soulierfrancoise omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT tremeauxpauline omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples
AT izopetjacques omicronwavesarscov2diagnosisevaluationofsalivaanteriornasalandnasopharyngealswabsamples