Cargando…

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA

Falls in older adults can be prevented with early identification. Recent research investigates the use of wearable sensors to provide quantitative data on mobility parameters to assess risk of fall. However, the efficiency of these new methods in comparison to conventional fall risk assessment tools...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kulkarni, Snehal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.3093
_version_ 1784854731090296832
author Kulkarni, Snehal
author_facet Kulkarni, Snehal
author_sort Kulkarni, Snehal
collection PubMed
description Falls in older adults can be prevented with early identification. Recent research investigates the use of wearable sensors to provide quantitative data on mobility parameters to assess risk of fall. However, the efficiency of these new methods in comparison to conventional fall risk assessment tools is unknown. Therefore, the current study compares the sensor-based fall risk assessment with conventional fall risk measures. The study included 659 community-dwelling older adults (>60 years) who were followed for 12 months after baseline. The American Geriatric Society Fall Risk Assessment tool was used to assess risk of fall conventionally and Kinesis QTUG was used to assess the fall risk using sensors. Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to compare the sensor-based method and the conventional method of assessing fall risk. Out of the 659 community-dwelling older adults, 24% (163) of older adults reported a fall in 12 months. According to the sensor-based assessment, 23% of older adults had low risk, 50% had medium risk and 27% had high risk of fall and according to the conventional method 66.1% were in low risk, 27.1% were in medium risk and 6.8% were in high risk. The ROC analysis showed that the sensor-based methods (AUC-78%; sensitivity- 93.8% specificity – 56.3%) outperformed the conventional method (AUC – 61.2%; sensitivity – 82.8% and specificity - 67.2%) of identifying older adults at risk of fall. Therefore, use of simple wearable sensors can determine the risk of future falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97710352023-01-24 A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA Kulkarni, Snehal Innov Aging Late Breaking Abstracts Falls in older adults can be prevented with early identification. Recent research investigates the use of wearable sensors to provide quantitative data on mobility parameters to assess risk of fall. However, the efficiency of these new methods in comparison to conventional fall risk assessment tools is unknown. Therefore, the current study compares the sensor-based fall risk assessment with conventional fall risk measures. The study included 659 community-dwelling older adults (>60 years) who were followed for 12 months after baseline. The American Geriatric Society Fall Risk Assessment tool was used to assess risk of fall conventionally and Kinesis QTUG was used to assess the fall risk using sensors. Receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was used to compare the sensor-based method and the conventional method of assessing fall risk. Out of the 659 community-dwelling older adults, 24% (163) of older adults reported a fall in 12 months. According to the sensor-based assessment, 23% of older adults had low risk, 50% had medium risk and 27% had high risk of fall and according to the conventional method 66.1% were in low risk, 27.1% were in medium risk and 6.8% were in high risk. The ROC analysis showed that the sensor-based methods (AUC-78%; sensitivity- 93.8% specificity – 56.3%) outperformed the conventional method (AUC – 61.2%; sensitivity – 82.8% and specificity - 67.2%) of identifying older adults at risk of fall. Therefore, use of simple wearable sensors can determine the risk of future falls. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9771035/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.3093 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Late Breaking Abstracts
Kulkarni, Snehal
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title_full A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title_fullStr A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title_full_unstemmed A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title_short A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FALL RISK ASSESSMENT IN COMMUNITY DWELLING OLDER ADULTS IN INDIA
title_sort comparative study of fall risk assessment in community dwelling older adults in india
topic Late Breaking Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.3093
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkarnisnehal acomparativestudyoffallriskassessmentincommunitydwellingolderadultsinindia
AT kulkarnisnehal comparativestudyoffallriskassessmentincommunitydwellingolderadultsinindia