Cargando…

DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?

In 2000, Japan introduced a mandatory long-term care insurance program to facilitate aging-in-place of older care recipients; there has been a great demand for assistive technologies such as AI (artificial intelligence) and robots in care settings to reduce the burden of caregivers and long-term car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wakui, Tomoko, Itoh, Sakiko, Miwa, Hiroyasu, Ikeuchi, Tomoko, Watanabe, Kentaro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771153/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2196
_version_ 1784854757968445440
author Wakui, Tomoko
Itoh, Sakiko
Miwa, Hiroyasu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Watanabe, Kentaro
author_facet Wakui, Tomoko
Itoh, Sakiko
Miwa, Hiroyasu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Watanabe, Kentaro
author_sort Wakui, Tomoko
collection PubMed
description In 2000, Japan introduced a mandatory long-term care insurance program to facilitate aging-in-place of older care recipients; there has been a great demand for assistive technologies such as AI (artificial intelligence) and robots in care settings to reduce the burden of caregivers and long-term care costs in society. This study examined the relationship between the trust in social security and acceptance of assistive technology for ADL help and discussed the challenges in introducing technology in a well-developed social security system. An online survey was conducted in August 2020 among community-dwelling individuals aged between 40 and 89 across Japan to find out their acceptance of help provided via AI or robotics technology in five dimensions of ADL. In addition, a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the trust in social security.A total of 4,047 respondents were analyzed in this study. The respondents’ mean age was 60.6 (SD=11.3), and 53.2% of them were female. Of those, 13.2% preferred help from humans in ADL, while for 86.8%, the use of some assistive technology was acceptable. Logistic regression revealed that the female and younger respondents and those who had better health and had completed higher education were more likely to accept AI or robotics technology in all/some ADL if they needed assistance; those with higher trust in social security, however, were less likely to accept technology (OR=.894; p=.011).The challenges in introducing assistive technology under a well-developed social security system will be discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771153
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97711532023-01-24 DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP? Wakui, Tomoko Itoh, Sakiko Miwa, Hiroyasu Ikeuchi, Tomoko Watanabe, Kentaro Innov Aging Abstracts In 2000, Japan introduced a mandatory long-term care insurance program to facilitate aging-in-place of older care recipients; there has been a great demand for assistive technologies such as AI (artificial intelligence) and robots in care settings to reduce the burden of caregivers and long-term care costs in society. This study examined the relationship between the trust in social security and acceptance of assistive technology for ADL help and discussed the challenges in introducing technology in a well-developed social security system. An online survey was conducted in August 2020 among community-dwelling individuals aged between 40 and 89 across Japan to find out their acceptance of help provided via AI or robotics technology in five dimensions of ADL. In addition, a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the trust in social security.A total of 4,047 respondents were analyzed in this study. The respondents’ mean age was 60.6 (SD=11.3), and 53.2% of them were female. Of those, 13.2% preferred help from humans in ADL, while for 86.8%, the use of some assistive technology was acceptable. Logistic regression revealed that the female and younger respondents and those who had better health and had completed higher education were more likely to accept AI or robotics technology in all/some ADL if they needed assistance; those with higher trust in social security, however, were less likely to accept technology (OR=.894; p=.011).The challenges in introducing assistive technology under a well-developed social security system will be discussed. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9771153/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2196 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstracts
Wakui, Tomoko
Itoh, Sakiko
Miwa, Hiroyasu
Ikeuchi, Tomoko
Watanabe, Kentaro
DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title_full DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title_fullStr DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title_full_unstemmed DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title_short DOES TRUST IN SOCIAL SECURITY INHIBIT ACCEPTANCE OF ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR ADL HELP?
title_sort does trust in social security inhibit acceptance of assistive technology for adl help?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771153/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2196
work_keys_str_mv AT wakuitomoko doestrustinsocialsecurityinhibitacceptanceofassistivetechnologyforadlhelp
AT itohsakiko doestrustinsocialsecurityinhibitacceptanceofassistivetechnologyforadlhelp
AT miwahiroyasu doestrustinsocialsecurityinhibitacceptanceofassistivetechnologyforadlhelp
AT ikeuchitomoko doestrustinsocialsecurityinhibitacceptanceofassistivetechnologyforadlhelp
AT watanabekentaro doestrustinsocialsecurityinhibitacceptanceofassistivetechnologyforadlhelp