Cargando…

Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and eltrombopag are two distinct TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) with different mechanisms. During the pandemic, when immunosuppressive medications are controversial, switching to another TPO-RA may be worth exploring in patients who do not benef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Xuan, Fu, Haixia, Zhao, Xiangyu, Lu, Jin, Jiang, Qian, Chang, Yingjun, Huang, Xiaojun, Zhang, Xiaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002346
_version_ 1784854778750173184
author Cai, Xuan
Fu, Haixia
Zhao, Xiangyu
Lu, Jin
Jiang, Qian
Chang, Yingjun
Huang, Xiaojun
Zhang, Xiaohui
author_facet Cai, Xuan
Fu, Haixia
Zhao, Xiangyu
Lu, Jin
Jiang, Qian
Chang, Yingjun
Huang, Xiaojun
Zhang, Xiaohui
author_sort Cai, Xuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and eltrombopag are two distinct TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) with different mechanisms. During the pandemic, when immunosuppressive medications are controversial, switching to another TPO-RA may be worth exploring in patients who do not benefit from their first TPO-RA. We investigated the outcomes of switching from rh-TPO to eltrombopag or vice versa in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, observational investigation included 96 adult ITP patients who needed to switch between rh-TPO and eltrombopag between January 2020 and January 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital in China. The study evaluated response rates and platelet counts at different time points after the switch, bleeding events, time to response, duration of response, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after switching, response was observed in 21/49 patients (43%) who switched for inefficacy and 34/47 patients (72%) who switched for non-efficacy-related issues. In the inefficacy group, 9/27 patients (33%) responded to eltrombopag, and 12/22 patients (55%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 21/26 (81%) and 13/21 (62%) patients in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 weeks after switching, respectively. Response at 6 months was achieved in 24/49 patients (49%) switching for inefficacy and 37/47 patients (79%) switching for non-efficacy issues. In the inefficacy group, 13/27 patients (48%) responded to eltrombopag, and 11/22 patients (50%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 22/26 patients (85%) and 15/21 patients (71%) in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 months after switching, respectively. Both eltrombopag and rh-TPO were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of switching between rh-TPO and eltrombopag for ITP patients who had no response to or experienced adverse events with their first TPO-RA. When the switch was motivated by other reasons, including patient preference and platelet count fluctuations, the probability of response was high. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214951.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97712382022-12-22 Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study Cai, Xuan Fu, Haixia Zhao, Xiangyu Lu, Jin Jiang, Qian Chang, Yingjun Huang, Xiaojun Zhang, Xiaohui Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Recombinant human thrombopoietin (rh-TPO) and eltrombopag are two distinct TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) with different mechanisms. During the pandemic, when immunosuppressive medications are controversial, switching to another TPO-RA may be worth exploring in patients who do not benefit from their first TPO-RA. We investigated the outcomes of switching from rh-TPO to eltrombopag or vice versa in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, observational investigation included 96 adult ITP patients who needed to switch between rh-TPO and eltrombopag between January 2020 and January 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital in China. The study evaluated response rates and platelet counts at different time points after the switch, bleeding events, time to response, duration of response, and adverse events. RESULTS: At 6 weeks after switching, response was observed in 21/49 patients (43%) who switched for inefficacy and 34/47 patients (72%) who switched for non-efficacy-related issues. In the inefficacy group, 9/27 patients (33%) responded to eltrombopag, and 12/22 patients (55%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 21/26 (81%) and 13/21 (62%) patients in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 weeks after switching, respectively. Response at 6 months was achieved in 24/49 patients (49%) switching for inefficacy and 37/47 patients (79%) switching for non-efficacy issues. In the inefficacy group, 13/27 patients (48%) responded to eltrombopag, and 11/22 patients (50%) responded to rh-TPO. In the non-efficacy-related group, 22/26 patients (85%) and 15/21 patients (71%) in the eltrombopag and rh-TPO groups maintained their response rates at 6 months after switching, respectively. Both eltrombopag and rh-TPO were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed the safety and effectiveness of switching between rh-TPO and eltrombopag for ITP patients who had no response to or experienced adverse events with their first TPO-RA. When the switch was motivated by other reasons, including patient preference and platelet count fluctuations, the probability of response was high. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04214951. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-10-05 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9771238/ /pubmed/36535011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002346 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cai, Xuan
Fu, Haixia
Zhao, Xiangyu
Lu, Jin
Jiang, Qian
Chang, Yingjun
Huang, Xiaojun
Zhang, Xiaohui
Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title_full Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title_fullStr Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title_short Switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
title_sort switching between eltrombopag and recombinant human thrombopoietin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia: an observational study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36535011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002346
work_keys_str_mv AT caixuan switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT fuhaixia switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT zhaoxiangyu switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT lujin switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT jiangqian switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT changyingjun switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT huangxiaojun switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy
AT zhangxiaohui switchingbetweeneltrombopagandrecombinanthumanthrombopoietininpatientswithimmunethrombocytopeniaanobservationalstudy