Cargando…

Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study

The basilar artery has the most perioperative complications in stenting compared to the other intracranial arteries. We aim to study whether the procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis has improved. This study was a single-arm, non-randomized trial that included historically controlled pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kai, Xu, Xiao-tong, Jin, Min, Liu, Ao-fei, Guo, Bao-shi, Qu, Ming-yue, Gao, Feng, Xiang, Li, Liu, Yun-e, Man, Feng-yuan, Jiang, Wei-jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032186
_version_ 1784854800657022976
author Wang, Kai
Xu, Xiao-tong
Jin, Min
Liu, Ao-fei
Guo, Bao-shi
Qu, Ming-yue
Gao, Feng
Xiang, Li
Liu, Yun-e
Man, Feng-yuan
Jiang, Wei-jian
author_facet Wang, Kai
Xu, Xiao-tong
Jin, Min
Liu, Ao-fei
Guo, Bao-shi
Qu, Ming-yue
Gao, Feng
Xiang, Li
Liu, Yun-e
Man, Feng-yuan
Jiang, Wei-jian
author_sort Wang, Kai
collection PubMed
description The basilar artery has the most perioperative complications in stenting compared to the other intracranial arteries. We aim to study whether the procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis has improved. This study was a single-arm, non-randomized trial that included historically controlled patients for comparison. Between January 2012 and March 2019, 147 consecutive patients with symptomatic basilar stenoses receiving elective stenting treatment were included in current basilar artery stenting (BAS) group. The prospectively collected and registered 120 patients by the same interventional team from September 2001 to November 2011 were set as historical BAS group for control. A total of 267 individuals were included in this study, with a mean age of 59.5 ± 8.1 years. The proportion of patients with lesion length >15 mm was 26.5% (39/147) in the current BAS group versus 4.2% (5/120) in the historical BAS group. We found significant differences between these 2 groups in Mori A (17.7% vs 42.5%) and Mori C patients (42.9% vs 13.3%). The proportion of patients receiving preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMRI) evaluation was 83.0% (122/147) in the current BAS group versus 20.8% (25/120) in the historical group (P < .05). Balloon-expendable stent (BES) (n = 1), Wingspan (n = 34), and Enterprise (n = 112) stents were placed in the current BAS group. In contrast, only balloon-expendable stent (BES) (n = 48) and Wingspan (n = 72) were deployed in the historical BAS group. The incidence of the safety endpoint (SE) was 4.1% (involving 6 patients) in the current BAS group versus 11.7% (involving 14 patients) in the historical BAS group (P < .05). In multivariate analysis, no risk factor was associated with the occurrence of the safety endpoint (SE). When BAS cases operated by the surgical team accumulated to 120 to 150, the incidence of complications decreased significantly. This is the largest sample size study to discuss the safety of BAS. The significantly decreased incidence of complications indicates that the improving technical measures and the accumulation of operation experience are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771323
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97713232022-12-23 Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study Wang, Kai Xu, Xiao-tong Jin, Min Liu, Ao-fei Guo, Bao-shi Qu, Ming-yue Gao, Feng Xiang, Li Liu, Yun-e Man, Feng-yuan Jiang, Wei-jian Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 The basilar artery has the most perioperative complications in stenting compared to the other intracranial arteries. We aim to study whether the procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis has improved. This study was a single-arm, non-randomized trial that included historically controlled patients for comparison. Between January 2012 and March 2019, 147 consecutive patients with symptomatic basilar stenoses receiving elective stenting treatment were included in current basilar artery stenting (BAS) group. The prospectively collected and registered 120 patients by the same interventional team from September 2001 to November 2011 were set as historical BAS group for control. A total of 267 individuals were included in this study, with a mean age of 59.5 ± 8.1 years. The proportion of patients with lesion length >15 mm was 26.5% (39/147) in the current BAS group versus 4.2% (5/120) in the historical BAS group. We found significant differences between these 2 groups in Mori A (17.7% vs 42.5%) and Mori C patients (42.9% vs 13.3%). The proportion of patients receiving preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance (HRMRI) evaluation was 83.0% (122/147) in the current BAS group versus 20.8% (25/120) in the historical group (P < .05). Balloon-expendable stent (BES) (n = 1), Wingspan (n = 34), and Enterprise (n = 112) stents were placed in the current BAS group. In contrast, only balloon-expendable stent (BES) (n = 48) and Wingspan (n = 72) were deployed in the historical BAS group. The incidence of the safety endpoint (SE) was 4.1% (involving 6 patients) in the current BAS group versus 11.7% (involving 14 patients) in the historical BAS group (P < .05). In multivariate analysis, no risk factor was associated with the occurrence of the safety endpoint (SE). When BAS cases operated by the surgical team accumulated to 120 to 150, the incidence of complications decreased significantly. This is the largest sample size study to discuss the safety of BAS. The significantly decreased incidence of complications indicates that the improving technical measures and the accumulation of operation experience are necessary. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9771323/ /pubmed/36550875 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032186 Text en Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 5300
Wang, Kai
Xu, Xiao-tong
Jin, Min
Liu, Ao-fei
Guo, Bao-shi
Qu, Ming-yue
Gao, Feng
Xiang, Li
Liu, Yun-e
Man, Feng-yuan
Jiang, Wei-jian
Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title_full Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title_fullStr Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title_short Significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: A historically controlled study
title_sort significant improvement of procedural safety in stenting for basilar stenosis: a historically controlled study
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771323/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36550875
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000032186
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkai significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT xuxiaotong significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT jinmin significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT liuaofei significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT guobaoshi significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT qumingyue significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT gaofeng significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT xiangli significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT liuyune significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT manfengyuan significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy
AT jiangweijian significantimprovementofproceduralsafetyinstentingforbasilarstenosisahistoricallycontrolledstudy