Cargando…
MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING
Person-centered care (PCC), or delivery of care consistent with preferences, can improve outcomes for residents in long-term care (LTC). However, PCC has not been universally adopted. Few studies focus on measuring specific barriers to meeting resident preferences, hindering identification of action...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771426/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2858 |
_version_ | 1784854826075553792 |
---|---|
author | Block, Laura Greenhalgh, Ella Roberts, Tonya |
author_facet | Block, Laura Greenhalgh, Ella Roberts, Tonya |
author_sort | Block, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | Person-centered care (PCC), or delivery of care consistent with preferences, can improve outcomes for residents in long-term care (LTC). However, PCC has not been universally adopted. Few studies focus on measuring specific barriers to meeting resident preferences, hindering identification of actionable targets to improve PCC delivery. The purpose of this study was to develop and test the content validity of a survey that measures staff barriers to fulfilling resident preferences for daily care and activities. Item sets comprised of barriers and preferences were informed by a review of literature and a descriptive, qualitative study with 19 LTC staff. An expert panel (n=8) was convened to test content validity, and content validity indices (CVI) were calculated. The initial survey consisted of 12 item sets assessing whether knowledge gaps, resident characteristics (e.g. health needs), family, facility rules/policies, availability of options, or staffing/workload functioned as barriers to meeting resident preferences for daily care and activities (CVI = 0.76 barriers; CVI = 0.89 preferences). Revisions informed by expert feedback resulted in a total of 17 items sets. Second round testing with experts (n=10) revealed overall improved item sets (CVI = 0.77 barriers; CVI = 0.96 preferences). These findings indicate that the survey items have initial content validity in measuring staff barriers to meeting resident daily care and activity preferences. Further psychometric testing with LTC staff is needed prior to implementing the survey, which will represent the first tool of its kind for supporting measurement of staff-derived targets for PCC interventions and policy change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9771426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97714262023-01-24 MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING Block, Laura Greenhalgh, Ella Roberts, Tonya Innov Aging Late Breaking Abstracts Person-centered care (PCC), or delivery of care consistent with preferences, can improve outcomes for residents in long-term care (LTC). However, PCC has not been universally adopted. Few studies focus on measuring specific barriers to meeting resident preferences, hindering identification of actionable targets to improve PCC delivery. The purpose of this study was to develop and test the content validity of a survey that measures staff barriers to fulfilling resident preferences for daily care and activities. Item sets comprised of barriers and preferences were informed by a review of literature and a descriptive, qualitative study with 19 LTC staff. An expert panel (n=8) was convened to test content validity, and content validity indices (CVI) were calculated. The initial survey consisted of 12 item sets assessing whether knowledge gaps, resident characteristics (e.g. health needs), family, facility rules/policies, availability of options, or staffing/workload functioned as barriers to meeting resident preferences for daily care and activities (CVI = 0.76 barriers; CVI = 0.89 preferences). Revisions informed by expert feedback resulted in a total of 17 items sets. Second round testing with experts (n=10) revealed overall improved item sets (CVI = 0.77 barriers; CVI = 0.96 preferences). These findings indicate that the survey items have initial content validity in measuring staff barriers to meeting resident daily care and activity preferences. Further psychometric testing with LTC staff is needed prior to implementing the survey, which will represent the first tool of its kind for supporting measurement of staff-derived targets for PCC interventions and policy change. Oxford University Press 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9771426/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2858 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Late Breaking Abstracts Block, Laura Greenhalgh, Ella Roberts, Tonya MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title | MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title_full | MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title_fullStr | MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title_full_unstemmed | MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title_short | MEASURING BARRIERS TO LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENT PREFERENCES: DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDITY TESTING |
title_sort | measuring barriers to long-term care resident preferences: development and content validity testing |
topic | Late Breaking Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771426/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.2858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blocklaura measuringbarrierstolongtermcareresidentpreferencesdevelopmentandcontentvaliditytesting AT greenhalghella measuringbarrierstolongtermcareresidentpreferencesdevelopmentandcontentvaliditytesting AT robertstonya measuringbarrierstolongtermcareresidentpreferencesdevelopmentandcontentvaliditytesting |