Cargando…
Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y |
_version_ | 1784854899124600832 |
---|---|
author | Vogel, Raphaela Albright, Anna Lea Vial, Jessica George, Geet Stevens, Bjorn Bony, Sandrine |
author_facet | Vogel, Raphaela Albright, Anna Lea Vial, Jessica George, Geet Stevens, Bjorn Bony, Sandrine |
author_sort | Vogel, Raphaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base(5,6), with high-climate-sensitivity models suggesting a strong decrease in cloud-base cloudiness owing to increased lower-tropospheric mixing(5–7). Here we show that new observations from the EUREC(4)A (Elucidating the role of cloud-circulation coupling in climate) field campaign(8,9) refute this mixing-desiccation hypothesis. We find the dynamical increase of cloudiness through mixing to overwhelm the thermodynamic control through humidity. Because mesoscale motions and the entrainment rate contribute equally to variability in mixing but have opposing effects on humidity, mixing does not desiccate clouds. The magnitude, variability and coupling of mixing and cloudiness differ markedly among climate models and with the EUREC(4)A observations. Models with large trade cumulus feedbacks tend to exaggerate the dependence of cloudiness on relative humidity as opposed to mixing and also exaggerate variability in cloudiness. Our observational analyses render models with large positive feedbacks implausible and both support and explain at the process scale a weak trade cumulus feedback. Our findings thus refute an important line of evidence for a high climate sensitivity(10,11). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9771822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97718222022-12-23 Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback Vogel, Raphaela Albright, Anna Lea Vial, Jessica George, Geet Stevens, Bjorn Bony, Sandrine Nature Article Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base(5,6), with high-climate-sensitivity models suggesting a strong decrease in cloud-base cloudiness owing to increased lower-tropospheric mixing(5–7). Here we show that new observations from the EUREC(4)A (Elucidating the role of cloud-circulation coupling in climate) field campaign(8,9) refute this mixing-desiccation hypothesis. We find the dynamical increase of cloudiness through mixing to overwhelm the thermodynamic control through humidity. Because mesoscale motions and the entrainment rate contribute equally to variability in mixing but have opposing effects on humidity, mixing does not desiccate clouds. The magnitude, variability and coupling of mixing and cloudiness differ markedly among climate models and with the EUREC(4)A observations. Models with large trade cumulus feedbacks tend to exaggerate the dependence of cloudiness on relative humidity as opposed to mixing and also exaggerate variability in cloudiness. Our observational analyses render models with large positive feedbacks implausible and both support and explain at the process scale a weak trade cumulus feedback. Our findings thus refute an important line of evidence for a high climate sensitivity(10,11). Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9771822/ /pubmed/36450982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Vogel, Raphaela Albright, Anna Lea Vial, Jessica George, Geet Stevens, Bjorn Bony, Sandrine Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title | Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title_full | Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title_fullStr | Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title_full_unstemmed | Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title_short | Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
title_sort | strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vogelraphaela strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback AT albrightannalea strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback AT vialjessica strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback AT georgegeet strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback AT stevensbjorn strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback AT bonysandrine strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback |