Cargando…

Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback

Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vogel, Raphaela, Albright, Anna Lea, Vial, Jessica, George, Geet, Stevens, Bjorn, Bony, Sandrine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y
_version_ 1784854899124600832
author Vogel, Raphaela
Albright, Anna Lea
Vial, Jessica
George, Geet
Stevens, Bjorn
Bony, Sandrine
author_facet Vogel, Raphaela
Albright, Anna Lea
Vial, Jessica
George, Geet
Stevens, Bjorn
Bony, Sandrine
author_sort Vogel, Raphaela
collection PubMed
description Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base(5,6), with high-climate-sensitivity models suggesting a strong decrease in cloud-base cloudiness owing to increased lower-tropospheric mixing(5–7). Here we show that new observations from the EUREC(4)A (Elucidating the role of cloud-circulation coupling in climate) field campaign(8,9) refute this mixing-desiccation hypothesis. We find the dynamical increase of cloudiness through mixing to overwhelm the thermodynamic control through humidity. Because mesoscale motions and the entrainment rate contribute equally to variability in mixing but have opposing effects on humidity, mixing does not desiccate clouds. The magnitude, variability and coupling of mixing and cloudiness differ markedly among climate models and with the EUREC(4)A observations. Models with large trade cumulus feedbacks tend to exaggerate the dependence of cloudiness on relative humidity as opposed to mixing and also exaggerate variability in cloudiness. Our observational analyses render models with large positive feedbacks implausible and both support and explain at the process scale a weak trade cumulus feedback. Our findings thus refute an important line of evidence for a high climate sensitivity(10,11).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97718222022-12-23 Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback Vogel, Raphaela Albright, Anna Lea Vial, Jessica George, Geet Stevens, Bjorn Bony, Sandrine Nature Article Shallow cumulus clouds in the trade-wind regions cool the planet by reflecting solar radiation. The response of trade cumulus clouds to climate change is a key uncertainty in climate projections(1–4). Trade cumulus feedbacks in climate models are governed by changes in cloud fraction near cloud base(5,6), with high-climate-sensitivity models suggesting a strong decrease in cloud-base cloudiness owing to increased lower-tropospheric mixing(5–7). Here we show that new observations from the EUREC(4)A (Elucidating the role of cloud-circulation coupling in climate) field campaign(8,9) refute this mixing-desiccation hypothesis. We find the dynamical increase of cloudiness through mixing to overwhelm the thermodynamic control through humidity. Because mesoscale motions and the entrainment rate contribute equally to variability in mixing but have opposing effects on humidity, mixing does not desiccate clouds. The magnitude, variability and coupling of mixing and cloudiness differ markedly among climate models and with the EUREC(4)A observations. Models with large trade cumulus feedbacks tend to exaggerate the dependence of cloudiness on relative humidity as opposed to mixing and also exaggerate variability in cloudiness. Our observational analyses render models with large positive feedbacks implausible and both support and explain at the process scale a weak trade cumulus feedback. Our findings thus refute an important line of evidence for a high climate sensitivity(10,11). Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-11-30 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9771822/ /pubmed/36450982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Vogel, Raphaela
Albright, Anna Lea
Vial, Jessica
George, Geet
Stevens, Bjorn
Bony, Sandrine
Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title_full Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title_fullStr Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title_full_unstemmed Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title_short Strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
title_sort strong cloud–circulation coupling explains weak trade cumulus feedback
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36450982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05364-y
work_keys_str_mv AT vogelraphaela strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback
AT albrightannalea strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback
AT vialjessica strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback
AT georgegeet strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback
AT stevensbjorn strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback
AT bonysandrine strongcloudcirculationcouplingexplainsweaktradecumulusfeedback