Cargando…

HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force

PROBLEM: Ambiguity in communication of key study parameters limits the utility of real‐world evidence (RWE) studies in healthcare decision‐making. Clear communication about data provenance, design, analysis, and implementation is needed. This would facilitate reproducibility, replication in independ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shirley V., Pottegård, Anton, Crown, William, Arlett, Peter, Ashcroft, Darren M., Benchimol, Eric I., Berger, Marc L., Crane, Gracy, Goettsch, Wim, Hua, Wei, Kabadi, Shaum, Kern, David M., Kurz, Xavier, Langan, Sinead, Nonaka, Takahiro, Orsini, Lucinda, Perez‐Gutthann, Susana, Pinheiro, Simone, Pratt, Nicole, Schneeweiss, Sebastian, Toussi, Massoud, Williams, Rebecca J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5507
_version_ 1784854907668398080
author Wang, Shirley V.
Pottegård, Anton
Crown, William
Arlett, Peter
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Benchimol, Eric I.
Berger, Marc L.
Crane, Gracy
Goettsch, Wim
Hua, Wei
Kabadi, Shaum
Kern, David M.
Kurz, Xavier
Langan, Sinead
Nonaka, Takahiro
Orsini, Lucinda
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Pinheiro, Simone
Pratt, Nicole
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
Toussi, Massoud
Williams, Rebecca J.
author_facet Wang, Shirley V.
Pottegård, Anton
Crown, William
Arlett, Peter
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Benchimol, Eric I.
Berger, Marc L.
Crane, Gracy
Goettsch, Wim
Hua, Wei
Kabadi, Shaum
Kern, David M.
Kurz, Xavier
Langan, Sinead
Nonaka, Takahiro
Orsini, Lucinda
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Pinheiro, Simone
Pratt, Nicole
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
Toussi, Massoud
Williams, Rebecca J.
author_sort Wang, Shirley V.
collection PubMed
description PROBLEM: Ambiguity in communication of key study parameters limits the utility of real‐world evidence (RWE) studies in healthcare decision‐making. Clear communication about data provenance, design, analysis, and implementation is needed. This would facilitate reproducibility, replication in independent data, and assessment of potential sources of bias. WHAT WE DID: The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) and ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) convened a joint task force, including representation from key international stakeholders, to create a harmonized protocol template for RWE studies that evaluate a treatment effect and are intended to inform decision‐making. The template builds on existing efforts to improve transparency and incorporates recent insights regarding the level of detail needed to enable RWE study reproducibility. The overarching principle was to reach for sufficient clarity regarding data, design, analysis, and implementation to achieve 3 main goals. One, to help investigators thoroughly consider, then document their choices and rationale for key study parameters that define the causal question (e.g., target estimand), two, to facilitate decision‐making by enabling reviewers to readily assess potential for biases related to these choices, and three, to facilitate reproducibility. STRATEGIES TO DISSEMINATE AND FACILITATE USE: Recognizing that the impact of this harmonized template relies on uptake, we have outlined a plan to introduce and pilot the template with key international stakeholders over the next 2 years. CONCLUSION: The HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility (HARPER) helps to create a shared understanding of intended scientific decisions through a common text, tabular and visual structure. The template provides a set of core recommendations for clear and reproducible RWE study protocols and is intended to be used as a backbone throughout the research process from developing a valid study protocol, to registration, through implementation and reporting on those implementation decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9771861
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97718612023-04-13 HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force Wang, Shirley V. Pottegård, Anton Crown, William Arlett, Peter Ashcroft, Darren M. Benchimol, Eric I. Berger, Marc L. Crane, Gracy Goettsch, Wim Hua, Wei Kabadi, Shaum Kern, David M. Kurz, Xavier Langan, Sinead Nonaka, Takahiro Orsini, Lucinda Perez‐Gutthann, Susana Pinheiro, Simone Pratt, Nicole Schneeweiss, Sebastian Toussi, Massoud Williams, Rebecca J. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Original Articles PROBLEM: Ambiguity in communication of key study parameters limits the utility of real‐world evidence (RWE) studies in healthcare decision‐making. Clear communication about data provenance, design, analysis, and implementation is needed. This would facilitate reproducibility, replication in independent data, and assessment of potential sources of bias. WHAT WE DID: The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) and ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) convened a joint task force, including representation from key international stakeholders, to create a harmonized protocol template for RWE studies that evaluate a treatment effect and are intended to inform decision‐making. The template builds on existing efforts to improve transparency and incorporates recent insights regarding the level of detail needed to enable RWE study reproducibility. The overarching principle was to reach for sufficient clarity regarding data, design, analysis, and implementation to achieve 3 main goals. One, to help investigators thoroughly consider, then document their choices and rationale for key study parameters that define the causal question (e.g., target estimand), two, to facilitate decision‐making by enabling reviewers to readily assess potential for biases related to these choices, and three, to facilitate reproducibility. STRATEGIES TO DISSEMINATE AND FACILITATE USE: Recognizing that the impact of this harmonized template relies on uptake, we have outlined a plan to introduce and pilot the template with key international stakeholders over the next 2 years. CONCLUSION: The HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility (HARPER) helps to create a shared understanding of intended scientific decisions through a common text, tabular and visual structure. The template provides a set of core recommendations for clear and reproducible RWE study protocols and is intended to be used as a backbone throughout the research process from developing a valid study protocol, to registration, through implementation and reporting on those implementation decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-10-10 2023-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9771861/ /pubmed/36215113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5507 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Shirley V.
Pottegård, Anton
Crown, William
Arlett, Peter
Ashcroft, Darren M.
Benchimol, Eric I.
Berger, Marc L.
Crane, Gracy
Goettsch, Wim
Hua, Wei
Kabadi, Shaum
Kern, David M.
Kurz, Xavier
Langan, Sinead
Nonaka, Takahiro
Orsini, Lucinda
Perez‐Gutthann, Susana
Pinheiro, Simone
Pratt, Nicole
Schneeweiss, Sebastian
Toussi, Massoud
Williams, Rebecca J.
HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title_full HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title_fullStr HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title_full_unstemmed HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title_short HARmonized Protocol Template to Enhance Reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: A good practices report of a joint ISPE/ISPOR task force
title_sort harmonized protocol template to enhance reproducibility of hypothesis evaluating real‐world evidence studies on treatment effects: a good practices report of a joint ispe/ispor task force
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9771861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36215113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.5507
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshirleyv harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT pottegardanton harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT crownwilliam harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT arlettpeter harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT ashcroftdarrenm harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT benchimolerici harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT bergermarcl harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT cranegracy harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT goettschwim harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT huawei harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT kabadishaum harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT kerndavidm harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT kurzxavier harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT langansinead harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT nonakatakahiro harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT orsinilucinda harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT perezgutthannsusana harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT pinheirosimone harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT prattnicole harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT schneeweisssebastian harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT toussimassoud harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce
AT williamsrebeccaj harmonizedprotocoltemplatetoenhancereproducibilityofhypothesisevaluatingrealworldevidencestudiesontreatmenteffectsagoodpracticesreportofajointispeisportaskforce