Cargando…
Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25864-1 |
_version_ | 1784854934461612032 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Angela Yun Marduy, Anna de Melo, Paulo S. Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Kim, Chi Kyung Choi, Hyuk Song, Jae-Jun Fregni, Felipe |
author_facet | Kim, Angela Yun Marduy, Anna de Melo, Paulo S. Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Kim, Chi Kyung Choi, Hyuk Song, Jae-Jun Fregni, Felipe |
author_sort | Kim, Angela Yun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9772204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97722042022-12-23 Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis Kim, Angela Yun Marduy, Anna de Melo, Paulo S. Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Kim, Chi Kyung Choi, Hyuk Song, Jae-Jun Fregni, Felipe Sci Rep Article Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has been investigated as a novel neuromodulation tool. Although taVNS is generally considered safe with only mild and transient adverse effects (AEs), those specifically caused by taVNS have not yet been investigated. This systematic review and meta-analysis on taVNS aimed to (1) systematically analyze study characteristics and AE assessment, (2) characterize and analyze possible AEs and their incidence, (3) search for predictable risk factors, (4) analyze the severity of AE, and (5) suggest an evidence-based taVNS adverse events questionnaire for safety monitoring. The articles searched were published through April 7, 2022, in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Lilacs databases. In general, we evaluated 177 studies that assessed 6322 subjects. From these, 55.37% of studies did not mention the presence or absence of any AEs; only 24.86% of the studies described that at least one adverse event occurred. In the 35 studies reporting the number of subjects with at least one adverse event, a meta-analytic approach to calculate the risk differences of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls was used. The meta-analytic overall adverse events incidence rate was calculated for the total number of adverse events reported on a 100,000 person-minutes-days scale. There were no differences in risk of developing an adverse event between active taVNS and controls. The incidence of AE, in general, was 12.84/100,000 person-minutes-days of stimulation, and the most frequently reported were ear pain, headache, and tingling. Almost half of the studies did not report the presence or absence of any AEs. We attribute this to the absence of AE in those studies. There was no causal relationship between taVNS and severe adverse events. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis of transcutaneous auricular stimulation safety. Overall, taVNS is a safe and feasible option for clinical intervention. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9772204/ /pubmed/36543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25864-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Angela Yun Marduy, Anna de Melo, Paulo S. Gianlorenco, Anna Carolyna Kim, Chi Kyung Choi, Hyuk Song, Jae-Jun Fregni, Felipe Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tavns): a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25864-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimangelayun safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT marduyanna safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demelopaulos safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gianlorencoannacarolyna safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kimchikyung safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT choihyuk safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT songjaejun safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fregnifelipe safetyoftranscutaneousauricularvagusnervestimulationtavnsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |