Cargando…

Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES: Accurate zonal segmentation of prostate boundaries on MRI is a critical prerequisite for automated prostate cancer detection based on PI-RADS. Many articles have been published describing deep learning methods offering great promise for fast and accurate segmentation of prostate zonal an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Carine, Montagne, Sarah, Hamzaoui, Dimitri, Ayache, Nicholas, Delingette, Hervé, Renard-Penna, Raphaële
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2
_version_ 1784854962058035200
author Wu, Carine
Montagne, Sarah
Hamzaoui, Dimitri
Ayache, Nicholas
Delingette, Hervé
Renard-Penna, Raphaële
author_facet Wu, Carine
Montagne, Sarah
Hamzaoui, Dimitri
Ayache, Nicholas
Delingette, Hervé
Renard-Penna, Raphaële
author_sort Wu, Carine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Accurate zonal segmentation of prostate boundaries on MRI is a critical prerequisite for automated prostate cancer detection based on PI-RADS. Many articles have been published describing deep learning methods offering great promise for fast and accurate segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy. The objective of this review was to provide a detailed analysis and comparison of applicability and efficiency of the published methods for automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy by systematically reviewing the current literature. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was conducted until June 30, 2021, using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and EMBase databases. Risk of bias and applicability based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria adjusted with Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 458 articles were identified, and 33 were included and reviewed. Only 2 articles had a low risk of bias for all four QUADAS-2 domains. In the remaining, insufficient details about database constitution and segmentation protocol provided sources of bias (inclusion criteria, MRI acquisition, ground truth). Eighteen different types of terminology for prostate zone segmentation were found, while 4 anatomic zones are described on MRI. Only 2 authors used a blinded reading, and 4 assessed inter-observer variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our review identified numerous methodological flaws and underlined biases precluding us from performing quantitative analysis for this review. This implies low robustness and low applicability in clinical practice of the evaluated methods. Actually, there is not yet consensus on quality criteria for database constitution and zonal segmentation methodology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9772373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97723732022-12-23 Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature Wu, Carine Montagne, Sarah Hamzaoui, Dimitri Ayache, Nicholas Delingette, Hervé Renard-Penna, Raphaële Insights Imaging Original Article OBJECTIVES: Accurate zonal segmentation of prostate boundaries on MRI is a critical prerequisite for automated prostate cancer detection based on PI-RADS. Many articles have been published describing deep learning methods offering great promise for fast and accurate segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy. The objective of this review was to provide a detailed analysis and comparison of applicability and efficiency of the published methods for automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy by systematically reviewing the current literature. METHODS: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was conducted until June 30, 2021, using PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and EMBase databases. Risk of bias and applicability based on Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria adjusted with Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 458 articles were identified, and 33 were included and reviewed. Only 2 articles had a low risk of bias for all four QUADAS-2 domains. In the remaining, insufficient details about database constitution and segmentation protocol provided sources of bias (inclusion criteria, MRI acquisition, ground truth). Eighteen different types of terminology for prostate zone segmentation were found, while 4 anatomic zones are described on MRI. Only 2 authors used a blinded reading, and 4 assessed inter-observer variability. CONCLUSIONS: Our review identified numerous methodological flaws and underlined biases precluding us from performing quantitative analysis for this review. This implies low robustness and low applicability in clinical practice of the evaluated methods. Actually, there is not yet consensus on quality criteria for database constitution and zonal segmentation methodology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2. Springer Vienna 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9772373/ /pubmed/36543901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Wu, Carine
Montagne, Sarah
Hamzaoui, Dimitri
Ayache, Nicholas
Delingette, Hervé
Renard-Penna, Raphaële
Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title_full Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title_short Automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on MRI: a systematic review of the literature
title_sort automatic segmentation of prostate zonal anatomy on mri: a systematic review of the literature
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36543901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01340-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wucarine automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT montagnesarah automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT hamzaouidimitri automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT ayachenicholas automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT delingetteherve automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT renardpennaraphaele automaticsegmentationofprostatezonalanatomyonmriasystematicreviewoftheliterature