Cargando…

Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype

BACKGROUND: Macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma (MTHCC) has a poor prognosis and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The purpose is to build and validate MRI-based models to predict the MTHCC subtype. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients with confirmed HCC were enrolled. Three models (model...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bilal Masokano, Ismail, Pei, Yigang, Chen, Juan, Liu, Wenguang, Xie, Simin, Liu, Huaping, Feng, Deyun, He, Qiongqiong, Li, Wenzheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1
_version_ 1784854962328567808
author Bilal Masokano, Ismail
Pei, Yigang
Chen, Juan
Liu, Wenguang
Xie, Simin
Liu, Huaping
Feng, Deyun
He, Qiongqiong
Li, Wenzheng
author_facet Bilal Masokano, Ismail
Pei, Yigang
Chen, Juan
Liu, Wenguang
Xie, Simin
Liu, Huaping
Feng, Deyun
He, Qiongqiong
Li, Wenzheng
author_sort Bilal Masokano, Ismail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma (MTHCC) has a poor prognosis and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The purpose is to build and validate MRI-based models to predict the MTHCC subtype. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients with confirmed HCC were enrolled. Three models (model 1: clinicoradiologic model; model 2: fusion radiomics signature; model 3: combined model 1 and model 2) were built based on their clinical data and MR images to predict MTHCC in training and validation cohorts. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the models was estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed, and its calibration was evaluated. RESULTS: Model 1 is easier to build than models 2 and 3, with a good AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.696–0.838) and 0.801 (95% CI 0.681–0.891) in predicting MTHCC in training and validation cohorts, respectively. It performed slightly superior to model 2 in both training (AUC 0.747; 95% CI 0.689–0.806; p = 0.548) and validation (AUC 0.718; 95% CI 0.618–0.810; p = 0.089) cohorts and was similar to model 3 in the validation (AUC 0.866; 95% CI 0.801–0.928; p = 0.321) but inferior in the training (AUC 0.889; 95% CI 0.851–0.926; p = 0.001) cohorts. The DCA of model 1 had a higher net benefit than the treat-all and treat-none strategy at a threshold probability of 10%. The calibration curves of model 1 closely aligned with the true MTHCC rates in the training (p = 0.355) and validation sets (p = 0.364). CONCLUSION: The clinicoradiologic model has a good performance in diagnosing MTHCC, and it is simpler and easier to implement, making it a valuable tool for pretherapeutic decision-making in patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9772375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97723752022-12-23 Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype Bilal Masokano, Ismail Pei, Yigang Chen, Juan Liu, Wenguang Xie, Simin Liu, Huaping Feng, Deyun He, Qiongqiong Li, Wenzheng Insights Imaging Original Article BACKGROUND: Macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma (MTHCC) has a poor prognosis and is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. The purpose is to build and validate MRI-based models to predict the MTHCC subtype. METHODS: Two hundred eight patients with confirmed HCC were enrolled. Three models (model 1: clinicoradiologic model; model 2: fusion radiomics signature; model 3: combined model 1 and model 2) were built based on their clinical data and MR images to predict MTHCC in training and validation cohorts. The performance of the models was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the models was estimated by decision curve analysis (DCA). A nomogram was constructed, and its calibration was evaluated. RESULTS: Model 1 is easier to build than models 2 and 3, with a good AUC of 0.773 (95% CI 0.696–0.838) and 0.801 (95% CI 0.681–0.891) in predicting MTHCC in training and validation cohorts, respectively. It performed slightly superior to model 2 in both training (AUC 0.747; 95% CI 0.689–0.806; p = 0.548) and validation (AUC 0.718; 95% CI 0.618–0.810; p = 0.089) cohorts and was similar to model 3 in the validation (AUC 0.866; 95% CI 0.801–0.928; p = 0.321) but inferior in the training (AUC 0.889; 95% CI 0.851–0.926; p = 0.001) cohorts. The DCA of model 1 had a higher net benefit than the treat-all and treat-none strategy at a threshold probability of 10%. The calibration curves of model 1 closely aligned with the true MTHCC rates in the training (p = 0.355) and validation sets (p = 0.364). CONCLUSION: The clinicoradiologic model has a good performance in diagnosing MTHCC, and it is simpler and easier to implement, making it a valuable tool for pretherapeutic decision-making in patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1. Springer Vienna 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9772375/ /pubmed/36544029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Bilal Masokano, Ismail
Pei, Yigang
Chen, Juan
Liu, Wenguang
Xie, Simin
Liu, Huaping
Feng, Deyun
He, Qiongqiong
Li, Wenzheng
Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title_full Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title_fullStr Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title_short Development and validation of MRI-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
title_sort development and validation of mri-based model for the preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular hepatocellular carcinoma subtype
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36544029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01333-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bilalmasokanoismail developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT peiyigang developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT chenjuan developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT liuwenguang developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT xiesimin developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT liuhuaping developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT fengdeyun developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT heqiongqiong developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype
AT liwenzheng developmentandvalidationofmribasedmodelforthepreoperativepredictionofmacrotrabecularhepatocellularcarcinomasubtype