Cargando…

Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion

OBJECTIVE: Femoral tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) can provide long-term hemodialysis access for patients with exhausted upper extremity access sites due to thoracic central venous occlusion. However, the use of femoral vein catheters (FVCs) has reportedly been associated with the risk of infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kittitirapong, Nutsiri, Jeraja, Benjaporn, Pootracool, Piyanut, Pornwaragorn, Chaowanun, Tepsamrithporn, Gorawee, Sitthilor, Surasit, Horsirimanont, Suthas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.10.019
_version_ 1784854991192719360
author Kittitirapong, Nutsiri
Jeraja, Benjaporn
Pootracool, Piyanut
Pornwaragorn, Chaowanun
Tepsamrithporn, Gorawee
Sitthilor, Surasit
Horsirimanont, Suthas
author_facet Kittitirapong, Nutsiri
Jeraja, Benjaporn
Pootracool, Piyanut
Pornwaragorn, Chaowanun
Tepsamrithporn, Gorawee
Sitthilor, Surasit
Horsirimanont, Suthas
author_sort Kittitirapong, Nutsiri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Femoral tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) can provide long-term hemodialysis access for patients with exhausted upper extremity access sites due to thoracic central venous occlusion. However, the use of femoral vein catheters (FVCs) has reportedly been associated with the risk of infection, malfunction, and discomfort. An inside-out technique will facilitate chest TCC placement by intentional retrograde extravascularization of the proximal occluded venous stump into the mediastinum. Next, the wire and small catheter are exteriorized to the skin at the base of the neck with a small skin incision. Then, the hemodialysis catheter is railed back down to the right atrium. With this technique, we placed the tip of the catheter into intrathoracic superior vena cava or brachiocephalic vein. In the present study, we compared the catheter patency of the inside-out technique vs a standard approach for FVC placement. METHODS: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted from May to December 2020. We included 22 patients requiring long-term hemodialysis with failed recanalization of thoracic central venous occlusion. The patients were randomized into the surgical inside-out (S-inside-out) group and FVC group. RESULTS: The S-inside-out and FVC groups included 10 and 12 patients, respectively. All 22 patients had undergone successful catheter placement. Catheter survival function was significantly higher for the S-inside-out group than for the FVC group (100% vs 50%, respectively; P = .017). In addition, the EQ-5D utility score was significantly better for the S-inside-out group (P = .008). Four cases of catheter infection occurred in the FVC group, but no catheter infection was found in the S-inside-out group. Procedural-related complications occurred in two patients; one case each of hemothorax and stroke in the S-inside-out group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the S-inside-out technique facilitated upper chest TCC placement for hemodialysis patients with exhausted access sites. This technique provided better catheter survival function, a better quality of life, and a lower infection rate, which outweighed the procedure risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9772498
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97724982022-12-23 Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion Kittitirapong, Nutsiri Jeraja, Benjaporn Pootracool, Piyanut Pornwaragorn, Chaowanun Tepsamrithporn, Gorawee Sitthilor, Surasit Horsirimanont, Suthas J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech Innovations in education OBJECTIVE: Femoral tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) can provide long-term hemodialysis access for patients with exhausted upper extremity access sites due to thoracic central venous occlusion. However, the use of femoral vein catheters (FVCs) has reportedly been associated with the risk of infection, malfunction, and discomfort. An inside-out technique will facilitate chest TCC placement by intentional retrograde extravascularization of the proximal occluded venous stump into the mediastinum. Next, the wire and small catheter are exteriorized to the skin at the base of the neck with a small skin incision. Then, the hemodialysis catheter is railed back down to the right atrium. With this technique, we placed the tip of the catheter into intrathoracic superior vena cava or brachiocephalic vein. In the present study, we compared the catheter patency of the inside-out technique vs a standard approach for FVC placement. METHODS: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted from May to December 2020. We included 22 patients requiring long-term hemodialysis with failed recanalization of thoracic central venous occlusion. The patients were randomized into the surgical inside-out (S-inside-out) group and FVC group. RESULTS: The S-inside-out and FVC groups included 10 and 12 patients, respectively. All 22 patients had undergone successful catheter placement. Catheter survival function was significantly higher for the S-inside-out group than for the FVC group (100% vs 50%, respectively; P = .017). In addition, the EQ-5D utility score was significantly better for the S-inside-out group (P = .008). Four cases of catheter infection occurred in the FVC group, but no catheter infection was found in the S-inside-out group. Procedural-related complications occurred in two patients; one case each of hemothorax and stroke in the S-inside-out group. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the S-inside-out technique facilitated upper chest TCC placement for hemodialysis patients with exhausted access sites. This technique provided better catheter survival function, a better quality of life, and a lower infection rate, which outweighed the procedure risk. Elsevier 2022-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9772498/ /pubmed/36568957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.10.019 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Innovations in education
Kittitirapong, Nutsiri
Jeraja, Benjaporn
Pootracool, Piyanut
Pornwaragorn, Chaowanun
Tepsamrithporn, Gorawee
Sitthilor, Surasit
Horsirimanont, Suthas
Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title_full Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title_fullStr Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title_short Comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
title_sort comparison of catheter patency between surgical inside-out technique and conventional femoral approach for tunneled cuffed catheter placement in patients with thoracic central venous occlusion
topic Innovations in education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772498/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568957
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2022.10.019
work_keys_str_mv AT kittitirapongnutsiri comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT jerajabenjaporn comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT pootracoolpiyanut comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT pornwaragornchaowanun comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT tepsamrithporngorawee comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT sitthilorsurasit comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion
AT horsirimanontsuthas comparisonofcatheterpatencybetweensurgicalinsideouttechniqueandconventionalfemoralapproachfortunneledcuffedcatheterplacementinpatientswiththoraciccentralvenousocclusion