Cargando…
Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: There have been important advances in the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat major depressive episodes. These include variations to the type of stimulus the brain regions stimulated, and the stimulus parameters (eg, stimulus duration/pulse width). Our aim is to investigate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068313 |
_version_ | 1784855025219010560 |
---|---|
author | Nikolin, Stevan Owens, Kieran Francis-Taylor, Rohan Chaimani, Anna Martin, Donel M Bull, Michael Sackeim, Harold A McLoughlin, Declan M Sienaert, Pascal Kellner, Charles H Loo, Colleen |
author_facet | Nikolin, Stevan Owens, Kieran Francis-Taylor, Rohan Chaimani, Anna Martin, Donel M Bull, Michael Sackeim, Harold A McLoughlin, Declan M Sienaert, Pascal Kellner, Charles H Loo, Colleen |
author_sort | Nikolin, Stevan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There have been important advances in the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat major depressive episodes. These include variations to the type of stimulus the brain regions stimulated, and the stimulus parameters (eg, stimulus duration/pulse width). Our aim is to investigate ECT types using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach and report on comparative treatment efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. METHOD: We will conduct a systematic review to identify randomised controlled trials that compared two or more ECT protocols to treat depression. This will be done using the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and will be supplemented by personal contacts with researchers in the field. All authors will be contacted to provide missing information. Primary outcomes will be symptom severity on a validated continuous clinician-rated scale of depression, cognitive functioning measured using anterograde verbal recall, and acceptability calculated using all-cause drop-outs. Secondary outcomes will include response and remission rates, autobiographical memory following a course of ECT, and anterograde visuospatial recall. Bayesian random effects hierarchical models will compare ECT types. Additional meta-regressions may be conducted to determine the impact of effect modifiers and patient-specific prognostic factors if sufficient data are available. DISCUSSION: This NMA will facilitate clinician decision making and allow more sophisticated selection of ECT type according to the balance of efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. ETHICS: This systematic review and NMA does not require research ethics approval as it will use published aggregate data and will not collect nor disclose individually identifiable participant data. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022357098. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9772645 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97726452022-12-23 Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis Nikolin, Stevan Owens, Kieran Francis-Taylor, Rohan Chaimani, Anna Martin, Donel M Bull, Michael Sackeim, Harold A McLoughlin, Declan M Sienaert, Pascal Kellner, Charles H Loo, Colleen BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: There have been important advances in the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat major depressive episodes. These include variations to the type of stimulus the brain regions stimulated, and the stimulus parameters (eg, stimulus duration/pulse width). Our aim is to investigate ECT types using a network meta-analysis (NMA) approach and report on comparative treatment efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. METHOD: We will conduct a systematic review to identify randomised controlled trials that compared two or more ECT protocols to treat depression. This will be done using the following databases: Embase, MEDLINE PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL and will be supplemented by personal contacts with researchers in the field. All authors will be contacted to provide missing information. Primary outcomes will be symptom severity on a validated continuous clinician-rated scale of depression, cognitive functioning measured using anterograde verbal recall, and acceptability calculated using all-cause drop-outs. Secondary outcomes will include response and remission rates, autobiographical memory following a course of ECT, and anterograde visuospatial recall. Bayesian random effects hierarchical models will compare ECT types. Additional meta-regressions may be conducted to determine the impact of effect modifiers and patient-specific prognostic factors if sufficient data are available. DISCUSSION: This NMA will facilitate clinician decision making and allow more sophisticated selection of ECT type according to the balance of efficacy, cognitive side effects and acceptability. ETHICS: This systematic review and NMA does not require research ethics approval as it will use published aggregate data and will not collect nor disclose individually identifiable participant data. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022357098. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9772645/ /pubmed/36549738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068313 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Nikolin, Stevan Owens, Kieran Francis-Taylor, Rohan Chaimani, Anna Martin, Donel M Bull, Michael Sackeim, Harold A McLoughlin, Declan M Sienaert, Pascal Kellner, Charles H Loo, Colleen Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy, cognitive effects and acceptability of electroconvulsive therapies for the treatment of depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772645/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068313 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nikolinstevan comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT owenskieran comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT francistaylorrohan comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT chaimanianna comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT martindonelm comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT bullmichael comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sackeimharolda comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT mcloughlindeclanm comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT sienaertpascal comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT kellnercharlesh comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT loocolleen comparativeefficacycognitiveeffectsandacceptabilityofelectroconvulsivetherapiesforthetreatmentofdepressionprotocolforasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |