Cargando…

How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia

OBJECTIVES: Patient attrition is high the first 6 months after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Patients with <6 months of ART are systematically excluded from most differentiated service delivery (DSD) models, which are intended to support retention. Despite DSD eligibility criteria requ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamieson, Lise, Rosen, Sydney, Phiri, Bevis, Grimsrud, Anna, Mwansa, Muya, Shakwelele, Hilda, Haimbe, Prudence, Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Mpande, Lumano-Mulenga, Priscilla, Chiboma, Innocent, Nichols, Brooke E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064070
_version_ 1784855030997712896
author Jamieson, Lise
Rosen, Sydney
Phiri, Bevis
Grimsrud, Anna
Mwansa, Muya
Shakwelele, Hilda
Haimbe, Prudence
Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Mpande
Lumano-Mulenga, Priscilla
Chiboma, Innocent
Nichols, Brooke E
author_facet Jamieson, Lise
Rosen, Sydney
Phiri, Bevis
Grimsrud, Anna
Mwansa, Muya
Shakwelele, Hilda
Haimbe, Prudence
Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Mpande
Lumano-Mulenga, Priscilla
Chiboma, Innocent
Nichols, Brooke E
author_sort Jamieson, Lise
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patient attrition is high the first 6 months after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Patients with <6 months of ART are systematically excluded from most differentiated service delivery (DSD) models, which are intended to support retention. Despite DSD eligibility criteria requiring ≥6 months on ART, some patients enrol earlier. We compared loss to follow-up (LTFU) between patients enrolling in DSD models early with those enrolled according to guidelines, assessing whether the ART experience eligibility criterion is necessary. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected electronic medical record data. SETTING: PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥15 years) who initiated ART between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. OUTCOMES: LTFU (>30 days late for scheduled visit) at 18 months for ‘early enrollers’ (DSD enrolment after <6 months on ART) and ‘established enrollers’ (DSD enrolment after ≥6 months on ART). We used a log-binomial model to compare LTFU risk, adjusting for age, sex, location, ART refill interval and DSD model. RESULTS: For 6340 early enrollers and 25 857 established enrollers, there were no differences in sex (61% female), age (median 37 years) or location (65% urban). ART refill intervals were longer for established versus early enrollers (72% vs 55% were given 4–6 months refills). LTFU at 18 months was 3% (192 of 6340) for early enrollers and 5% (24 646 of 25 857) for established enrollers. Early enrollers were 41% less likely to be LTFU than established patients (adjusted risk ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in DSD after <6 months of ART were more likely to be retained than patients established on ART prior to DSD enrolment. A limitation is that early enrollers may have been selected for DSD due to providers’ and patients’ expectations about future retention. Offering DSD models to ART patients soon after ART initiation may help address high attrition during the early treatment period. TRIAL REGISTERATION NUMBER: NCT04158882.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9772670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97726702022-12-23 How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia Jamieson, Lise Rosen, Sydney Phiri, Bevis Grimsrud, Anna Mwansa, Muya Shakwelele, Hilda Haimbe, Prudence Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Mpande Lumano-Mulenga, Priscilla Chiboma, Innocent Nichols, Brooke E BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Patient attrition is high the first 6 months after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Patients with <6 months of ART are systematically excluded from most differentiated service delivery (DSD) models, which are intended to support retention. Despite DSD eligibility criteria requiring ≥6 months on ART, some patients enrol earlier. We compared loss to follow-up (LTFU) between patients enrolling in DSD models early with those enrolled according to guidelines, assessing whether the ART experience eligibility criterion is necessary. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected electronic medical record data. SETTING: PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥15 years) who initiated ART between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2020. OUTCOMES: LTFU (>30 days late for scheduled visit) at 18 months for ‘early enrollers’ (DSD enrolment after <6 months on ART) and ‘established enrollers’ (DSD enrolment after ≥6 months on ART). We used a log-binomial model to compare LTFU risk, adjusting for age, sex, location, ART refill interval and DSD model. RESULTS: For 6340 early enrollers and 25 857 established enrollers, there were no differences in sex (61% female), age (median 37 years) or location (65% urban). ART refill intervals were longer for established versus early enrollers (72% vs 55% were given 4–6 months refills). LTFU at 18 months was 3% (192 of 6340) for early enrollers and 5% (24 646 of 25 857) for established enrollers. Early enrollers were 41% less likely to be LTFU than established patients (adjusted risk ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Patients enrolled in DSD after <6 months of ART were more likely to be retained than patients established on ART prior to DSD enrolment. A limitation is that early enrollers may have been selected for DSD due to providers’ and patients’ expectations about future retention. Offering DSD models to ART patients soon after ART initiation may help address high attrition during the early treatment period. TRIAL REGISTERATION NUMBER: NCT04158882. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9772670/ /pubmed/36549722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064070 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Jamieson, Lise
Rosen, Sydney
Phiri, Bevis
Grimsrud, Anna
Mwansa, Muya
Shakwelele, Hilda
Haimbe, Prudence
Mukumbwa-Mwenechanya, Mpande
Lumano-Mulenga, Priscilla
Chiboma, Innocent
Nichols, Brooke E
How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title_full How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title_fullStr How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title_full_unstemmed How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title_short How soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? Evidence from a retrospective cohort study in Zambia
title_sort how soon should patients be eligible for differentiated service delivery models for antiretroviral treatment? evidence from a retrospective cohort study in zambia
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36549722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064070
work_keys_str_mv AT jamiesonlise howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT rosensydney howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT phiribevis howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT grimsrudanna howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT mwansamuya howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT shakwelelehilda howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT haimbeprudence howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT mukumbwamwenechanyampande howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT lumanomulengapriscilla howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT chibomainnocent howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia
AT nicholsbrookee howsoonshouldpatientsbeeligiblefordifferentiatedservicedeliverymodelsforantiretroviraltreatmentevidencefromaretrospectivecohortstudyinzambia