Cargando…

Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome

Our objective was to evaluate the effects of bacteria (Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus lichenformis, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium), enzymes (amylase, hemicellulose, and xylanase), and yeast as additives on the ruminal microbiome. We hypothesized that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arce-Cordero, J A, Bennett, S L, Liu, T, Ravelo, A, Lobo, R R, Jeong, K C, Faciola, A P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac157
_version_ 1784855063441702912
author Arce-Cordero, J A
Bennett, S L
Liu, T
Ravelo, A
Lobo, R R
Jeong, K C
Faciola, A P
author_facet Arce-Cordero, J A
Bennett, S L
Liu, T
Ravelo, A
Lobo, R R
Jeong, K C
Faciola, A P
author_sort Arce-Cordero, J A
collection PubMed
description Our objective was to evaluate the effects of bacteria (Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus lichenformis, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium), enzymes (amylase, hemicellulose, and xylanase), and yeast as additives on the ruminal microbiome. We hypothesized that inclusion of bacteria, enzymes, and yeast would impact butyric bacterial populations. Eight fermenters were arranged in a duplicated 4 × 4 Latin square with the following treatments: 1) control without additives (CTRL); 2) bacterial culture and enzyme blend (EB); 3) bacterial culture and enzyme blend with a live yeast and yeast culture blend (EBY); and 4) double dose of bacterial culture and enzyme blend and the yeast products blend (2X). We conducted four fermentation periods of 10 d each, with the last 3 d for collection of samples. Overall, 64 solid and liquid samples were analyzed by amplification of the V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA. Data were analyzed with R and SAS. The following orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) ADD—the control compared to all treatments with additives (CTRL vs. EB, EBY, and 2X); 2) YEAST—treatment without yeast compared to those with yeast (EB vs. EBY and 2X); and 3) DOSE—the single dose of enzymes, bacteria, and yeast compared to the doubled dose (EBY vs. 2X). Family Prevotellaceae was more abundant when additives were added (ADD). Additives (ADD) also increased relative abundance of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 and YAB2003 in solid fraction, and of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 and two members of Lachnospiracea family in liquid fraction. Yeast (YEAST) decreased relative abundance of Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001 and increased abundance of Ruminococcus and Prevotellaceae UCG-003 in solid fraction. Doubling the dose of enzymes and microbial additives (DOSE) decreased the abundance of Succiniclasticum in solid fraction and Selenomonadaceae in the liquid. Molar proportion of butyrate was highly correlated with abundance of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 in solid (r = 0.68) and liquid fraction (r = 0.79), and with Unclassified Lachnospiraceae in liquid (r = 0.70). Our results demonstrate that YEAST decreases abundance of succinate synthesizing bacteria, while DOSE decreases abundance of bacteria that metabolize succinate into propionate. Combined bacteria, enzymes, and yeast increase the relative abundance of specific genera primarily within the Prevotellaceae family, which may explain the increase in butyrate molar proportion observed with ADD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9772820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97728202022-12-22 Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome Arce-Cordero, J A Bennett, S L Liu, T Ravelo, A Lobo, R R Jeong, K C Faciola, A P Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition Our objective was to evaluate the effects of bacteria (Lactobacillus animalis, Propionibacterium freudenreichii, Bacillus lichenformis, Bacillus subtilis, and Enterococcus faecium), enzymes (amylase, hemicellulose, and xylanase), and yeast as additives on the ruminal microbiome. We hypothesized that inclusion of bacteria, enzymes, and yeast would impact butyric bacterial populations. Eight fermenters were arranged in a duplicated 4 × 4 Latin square with the following treatments: 1) control without additives (CTRL); 2) bacterial culture and enzyme blend (EB); 3) bacterial culture and enzyme blend with a live yeast and yeast culture blend (EBY); and 4) double dose of bacterial culture and enzyme blend and the yeast products blend (2X). We conducted four fermentation periods of 10 d each, with the last 3 d for collection of samples. Overall, 64 solid and liquid samples were analyzed by amplification of the V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA. Data were analyzed with R and SAS. The following orthogonal contrasts were used: 1) ADD—the control compared to all treatments with additives (CTRL vs. EB, EBY, and 2X); 2) YEAST—treatment without yeast compared to those with yeast (EB vs. EBY and 2X); and 3) DOSE—the single dose of enzymes, bacteria, and yeast compared to the doubled dose (EBY vs. 2X). Family Prevotellaceae was more abundant when additives were added (ADD). Additives (ADD) also increased relative abundance of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 and YAB2003 in solid fraction, and of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 and two members of Lachnospiracea family in liquid fraction. Yeast (YEAST) decreased relative abundance of Succinivibrionaceae UCG-001 and increased abundance of Ruminococcus and Prevotellaceae UCG-003 in solid fraction. Doubling the dose of enzymes and microbial additives (DOSE) decreased the abundance of Succiniclasticum in solid fraction and Selenomonadaceae in the liquid. Molar proportion of butyrate was highly correlated with abundance of Prevotellaceae Ga6A1 in solid (r = 0.68) and liquid fraction (r = 0.79), and with Unclassified Lachnospiraceae in liquid (r = 0.70). Our results demonstrate that YEAST decreases abundance of succinate synthesizing bacteria, while DOSE decreases abundance of bacteria that metabolize succinate into propionate. Combined bacteria, enzymes, and yeast increase the relative abundance of specific genera primarily within the Prevotellaceae family, which may explain the increase in butyrate molar proportion observed with ADD. Oxford University Press 2022-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9772820/ /pubmed/36568899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac157 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Arce-Cordero, J A
Bennett, S L
Liu, T
Ravelo, A
Lobo, R R
Jeong, K C
Faciola, A P
Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title_full Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title_fullStr Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title_full_unstemmed Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title_short Combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
title_sort combinations of bacterial cultures, exogenous enzymes, and yeast-based feed additives and their impact on ruminal microbiome
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac157
work_keys_str_mv AT arcecorderoja combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT bennettsl combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT liut combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT raveloa combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT loborr combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT jeongkc combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome
AT faciolaap combinationsofbacterialculturesexogenousenzymesandyeastbasedfeedadditivesandtheirimpactonruminalmicrobiome