Cargando…

Prospective comparison of (68)Ga-FAPI-04 and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for tumor staging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE: To explore the difference in the effectiveness of gallium-68 fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ((68)Ga-FAPI-04) PET/CT and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT for the initial staging of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: The Affiliated Hospital of Sou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Haoyuan, Liang, Juan, Qiu, Lin, Xu, Tingting, Cai, Liang, Wan, Qiang, Wang, Li, Liu, Ya, Chen, Yue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9772829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36568172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1047010
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To explore the difference in the effectiveness of gallium-68 fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ((68)Ga-FAPI-04) PET/CT and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/CT for the initial staging of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University hosted this single-center prospective investigation (Clinical Trials registration No.ChiCTR2100044131) between March 2020 and September 2021. Within a week, all subjects underwent MR scans, (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT in order. The effectiveness of medical staging employing (68)Ga-FAPI-04 and (18)F-FDG PET/CT was compared. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with primary NPC were evaluated (mean age53 ± 11 years). (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT indicated an elevated recognition rate for diagnosing primary tumors (28/28 [100%] vs. 27/28 [96%]) and lymph node metastases (263/285 [92%] vs. 228/285 [80%]), but a lower detection rate for distant metastases (5/7 [71%] vs. 7/7 [100%]) compared with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. A significant association between the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of (18)F-FDG PET and (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET was found in the primary cancers (r = 0.691, p < 0.001). In comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT, (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT upstaged the T stage in five patients while downstaging the N stage in seven patients. (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT corrected the overall staging of five patients on(18)F-FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSION: (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is preferable to (18)F-FDG PET/CT for NPC staging in terms of the detection efficiency for primary tumors and lymph node metastasis. This is especially true when evaluating the primary cancer and any spread to contiguous tissues. It is possible to improve the staging assessment of NPC by using (68)Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in conjunction with (18)F-FDG PET/CT.